hindi ko na tinapos yung video unang sultada palang ng tanong napaka m0ron na ng sagot ni Rosales
"what particular religious belief?" sinagot ang tanong ng tangang tanong as if naman hindi nya alam na ang religious tradition natin ay judeo-christian-islamic tradition.
Hindi na natin kaylangan ng batas na yan, everyone is entitled on human right, we should not make a law that favor the selected few. Philippines is been ranked as one of the most gay-friendly nations in the world and the most gay-friendly in Asia Kaya isa lamang kabulastugan at kalayawan ang batas na yan, kaya wag nila palabasin na aping api sila sa bansa na to para mag mag sulong ng batas na mag bibigay ng special treatment sa kanila. Ang discriminations hindi nawawala yan, diskriminasyon sa kulay, kasarian, relihiyon. That garbage bill is not neccessary we have existing law that guaranteed the rights of our citizens against discriminations. Sila lang ba ang espesyal at center of attention? Pano pala kung halimbawa mag demand din ang mga religion for example the INC ng batas na bawal sila i discriminate, bawal sila tuligsain? ano ang mangyayari sa freedom of religion natin, sa malayang religious debates and dialogue most of all sa demokrasya natin? Same with that sogie bill, pupuwede nilang gamitin yan upang mapigilan ang religious freedom sa bansa. Makatwiran ba pilitin natin ang mga pari at pastor na wag punahin ang mga bakla sa mga ginagawa nila sa opinyon nila ay imoral sang ayon sa kanilang doktrina gayong meron silang freedom of expression and freedom of religion? ang basurang batas na yan babangga sa religious freedom na umiiral sa bansa.
What would be the consequences for a seminary or convent that adheres to Church laws and denies entry to a transgender individual seeking to study and become a priest?
In the case of parishes and Catholic universities that refuse to permit or acknowledge lgbt organizations, what will be the consequences in relation to their obligation to adhere to Church doctrines?
How about catholic and christian establishments such as bookstores, travel agencies, radio stations, television networks, or religious institutions if they refuse to employ lgbt individuals due to conflicts with their religious beliefs?
I only included the catholic since we are majority catholic country.
So how about the Shrariah court and law of Muslim Mindanao? sasaklawin ng batas na yan ang mga lgbt muslims
at panigurado babangga yan Shariah nila at sa existing Code of Muslims Personal Law.
Sa totoo lang halos lahat ng religious institutions sa ating bansa nagkaka isa sa isang bagay sa issue na ito:
They expressed their support for an anti-discrimination law that rejects second-class treatment for the lgbayot community. However, The reason whty they cannot support lgbt is because they cannot encourage choosing one's gender and performing homosexual acts, because simply they believes that gender and sexuality are God's gifts i cannnot say i agree with them, but i respect their belief and freedom of religion.
Bilang isang agnostic atheist, hindi ko pinagtatanggol ang mga religion lalo na ang mga doktrina nila na against sa lgbt
but in this sogie issue i am with them, while we are in the same side against sogie, my reason is different. Mapag mahal ako sa kalayaan (including freedom of religion and freedom of expression) at naniniwala ako ang sogie bill ay sasagasaan niya ang kalayaan sa pananampalataya ng mayorya ng atin mga kababayan dahil lamang sa kapritso at kalayawan ng gamunggong iilan. It is unreasonable to anticipate adherents of the major global religious beliefs to modify their principles in order to comply with a legislation that would infringe upon their inherent freedom to practice the religion they hold dear.