Bibliya o Siyensya?

[Powered by Pancit Canton]

Wala naman saktong sinabi na purong tubig lang sinabi. Kung kontexto ang pag uusapan, sinabi na ang mundo ay formless and empty..and God's spirit hovering or operating above the watery deep..hindi sinabi na pure water ang mundo nung simula. Wala naman scientific basis na ang pure water can hold by itself in space kasi it will be dis-integrated by gravity. So.ano itsura o shape ng mundo na puro tubig ang material? By theory, if we analyze the biblical passages, and applying science and reason, the young earth is hot...young earth was almost a plasma not totally solid nor liquid but gradually cooled down..evidence why the earth was so hot were volcanic eruptions...til now deep inside earth is so hot..still inside is not totally solid..that is how science works...the Logos had spoken of creation and humans try to understand this thru science

The squished hydrogen is a precursor to a state of matter first proposed in the 1930s, called atomic solid metallichydrogen. When cooled to low enough temperatures, hydrogen (which on Earth is usually found as a gas) canbecome a solid; at high enough pressures, when the element solidifies, it turns into a metal- from liquid (hydrogen kapag hiniwalay mo sa oxygen)form to solid form


Genesis 1:You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.At sinabi ng Dios, Mapisan ang tubig na nasa silong ng langit sa isang dako, at lumitaw ang katuyuan, at nagkagayon.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.At tinawag ng Dios ang katuyuan na Lupa, at ang kapisanan ng tubig ay tinawag niyang mga Dagat: at nakita ng Dios na mabuti.


Agree ako sayo tol, na hindi tubig lahat ang mundo noon, may core ang mundo tapos maraming tubig at wala pang lupa sa surface o wala pang anyo
Yong core siyang naghohold sa napakaraming tubig na nasa surface

 

[dkjj03]

Hindi po tayo galing sa unggoy mga ser.

Meron talaga tayong creator. Malalaman o makikilala lang natin sya after life.
Kaya kung ako mamamatay, ieembrace ko ung death. Dahil dun ko lang malalaman lahat ng sagot sa tanong ko about life.

 

[JRDN]

1. HeavenS= physical structures...the universe or multiverse. Ang pagkakaalam ko sinabi sa verse na Heavens....iba ung HeaveN which may refer to the spiritual realm.

2. Kung tama ung research mo na mas nauna ang existence ng Sun sa Earth, wala naman clear na kntradikayon sa verse na pinupunto mo...maaari na ang earth ay nababalutan ng volcanic clouds or ashes kaya madilim noon ang paligid..that is why there was darkness..this darkness is physical..imagine gaano kadami ng violent volcanic eruptions noon since the earth is yet too young..imagine just a single volcanic eruption today can render a large area dark...billions or millions of years in the past, the young earth was so violent...

3. Let there be light= the Creator might have dissolved the volcanic clouds or ashes when young earth was being formed. Of course, the Sun was already there, it was just the earth was covered with thick clouds that the Sun's light can not enter..we do not know if there was total darkness nor a darkness which was enough to prevent the emergence of life and/or photosynthesis reactions..we only speculate how dark the darkness here..

4. The Light here refers to the light of the Sun penetrating the young earth. The light was good because, soon the light was essential to the emergence of biological life..of course, this is a long story, kaya science tayo to understand the natural processes or the works of the Creator in the primeval earth. The light and darkness in this sense may refer to the literal day and night as the earth revolves and rotates with reference to its source of light, the Sun..

Scientifically, Darkness is a limit of the physical sense - sight.

Spiritually, darkness is the absence of knowledge or removed from God's grace.

Darkness, hence, has a relative existence and.not absolute. You cant qualify nothing as existent.

Note: I just attempt to answer questions 1-4 contextually, it doesnt mean my answer is what I believe

_taka08ra_
Paps I think this is a better explanation na mababasa mo. kaya nga sinasabi ko sayo diba? DARKNESS is the ABSENCE of Light. And sinabi ko din sayo na simula pa lang andun na yun Earth diba? FORMLESS and EMPTY nga lang.

 

[BJC]

sa Bibliya ako ts kase halos lahat ng mga scientific discoveries ay binibase nila sa Bible kagaya ni Albert Einstein isa siya sa mga naniniwala sa Bible.

 

[JRDN]

bandwagon
Powered by Lugaw

Ano ideya nyo tungkol sa Dinosaurs? I can't say its totally fake. Dahil sa mga fossils at dahil nabanggit din ito sa Book of Job.

 

[signhitler]

Scientific Books VS Bible?
Parehas lang gawa ng tao, but i go for science dahil sa facts na nanduon.

Ginawa lang yung Bible at Religion para mauto kayo, para may makapanlamang. Gumising na kayo sa katotohanan, naniniwala ako sa diyos pero hindi sa religion na gawa lamang ng tao.

 

[JRDN]

Scientific Books VS Bible?
Parehas lang gawa ng tao, but i go for science dahil sa facts na nanduon.

Ginawa lang yung Bible at Religion para mauto kayo, para may makapanlamang. Gumising na kayo sa katotohanan, naniniwala ako sa diyos pero hindi sa religion na gawa lamang ng tao.

mag back read ka muna. nasagot na yan

 

[Powered by Pancit Canton]

bandwagon
Powered by Lugaw

Ano ideya nyo tungkol sa Dinosaurs? I can't say its totally fake. Dahil sa mga fossils at dahil nabanggit din ito sa Book of Job.

Totoo ang mga dinosaurs tol kasi may mga pisikal na ebidensiya,, pinalipas na ng Dios ang mga unang dinosaurs meaning hinayaan na silang magkamatay inihahanda kasi ng Dios ang lupa para tahanan na ng tao

Genesis 1:24

 

[RyzenV]

jourdantinay
Bible verse:
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
_pagkakaintindi ko dito ayaw ng diyos na malalaman natin ang tama o mali. Ibig sabihin nun kung di nila kinain ang prutas e sa ngayon nakapatay na tayo di natin kung mali ba? eto ay kung babasi tayo sa Holy Book.
ELuhikal ba to para sa inyo?

nope.. wala pang kamatayan nun.. kasi di pa sila nasusumpa ng Diyos

 

[JRDN]

nope.. wala pang kamatayan nun.. kasi di pa sila nasusumpa ng Diyos

Correct.

 

[pawlow]

Basic Information Before Living Earth (BIBLE) parin ako.

 

[treskia]

Ako mas may basehan sa science siguro itong bagong teorya ko, ewan ko lang kung may mga article na nasulat ng mga sayantipiko, kung meron man ctto hehehe

Ang unang earthly sun for the first three days until the 4th (literally billions of years ago) could have been the diffused dwarf star turned gaseous planet we now knew as Jupiter, it illuminated the Earth for its early creatures like dinosaurs, and Jupiter lose its light before our Sun was placed and started giving its own light. The cause of dino extinction was the day when star Jupiter lose its light on the 'night' period of the third terrestrial 'day'.

 

[Yzzle]

NASA bibble talaga Ang mga kasagutan dahil noon at ilang generation na sinulat and proff..may simulla at may hangganan..Diyos Lang Ang mag patunay..Hindi science oh gawa Ng tao..God is great

 

[BoyBawang24]

Bible

 

[Gentleman007]

Ang Bible ay hindi aklat ng science pero kapag bumanggit ito ng about sa science lagi itong tumpak. Hindi na nakakapagtaka dahil ang bible ay aklat na galing sa Diyos na Maylalang ng lahat pati ng lahat ng utak ng tao.

 

[bandwagon]

Ang mundo at ang lahat ng meron dito, alin ba ang mas kapani-paniwala sayo? Ang explanation ba na basi sa Bibliya o Sayantipiko?

Depende kung ano ang ibig mo sabihin ng "lahat". Kung isama mo pati ang moralidad o ang meaning ng life, science is not the legitimate field of inquiry, since we have philosophy and religion. Ethics can be treated as science but it only deals about facts or hows of.morality. It does not answer the why's of.morality and the meaning of life.

"Science or bible and can not be both" is a false dichotomy. Science may confirm, affirm or negate biblical testimonies. The Bible is a book of morals and revelations.

 

[kirasven]

malamang bible wla pang sciece nung panahon ni god.
Utak nmn oh paganahin d nmn kayang gumawa ng science ng tao. robot ou.pero tao c god lng gumawa

 

[_no08One_]

"2. Kung tama ung research mo na mas nauna ang existence ng Sun sa Earth, wala naman clear na kntradikayon sa verse na pinupunto mo...maaari na ang earth ay nababalutan ng volcanic clouds or ashes kaya madilim noon ang paligid..that is why there was darkness..this darkness is physical..imagine gaano kadami ng violent volcanic eruptions noon since the earth is yet too young..imagine just a single volcanic eruption today can render a large area dark...billions or millions of years in the past, the young earth was so violent...

3. Let there be light= the Creator might have dissolved the volcanic clouds or ashes when young earth was being formed. Of course, the Sun was already there, it was just the earth was covered with thick clouds that the Sun's light can not enter..we do not know if there was total darkness nor a darkness which was enough to prevent the emergence of life and/or photosynthesis reactions..we only speculate how dark the darkness here..

4. The Light here refers to the light of the Sun penetrating the young earth. The light was good because, soon the light was essential to the emergence of biological life..of course, this is a long story, kaya science tayo to understand the natural processes or the works of the Creator in the primeval earth. The light and darkness in this sense may refer to the literal day and night as the earth revolves and rotates with reference to its source of light, the Sun.." bandwagon said

_ok salamat sa iyong pagpapaliwanag

 

[_no08One_]

Depende kung ano ang ibig mo sabihin ng "lahat". Kung isama mo pati ang moralidad o ang meaning ng life, science is not the legitimate field of inquiry, since we have philosophy and religion. Ethics can be treated as science but it only deals about facts or hows of.morality. It does not answer the why's of.morality and the meaning of life.

"Science or bible and can not be both" is a false dichotomy. Science may confirm, affirm or negate biblical testimonies. The Bible is a book of morals and revelations.

Ang morality ba ay sa bible lang makukuha?
Paki define ng yung "meaning of life" paps. Para malaman naman namin.

 

[_no08One_]

malamang bible wla pang sciece nung panahon ni god.
Utak nmn oh paganahin d nmn kayang gumawa ng science ng tao. robot ou.pero tao c god lng gumawa

Ok, name your GOD papi. Para naman malaman namin