laser-printed
Enthusiast
I totally understand the theory. At iyan po ang dahilan kaya ko nakita ang malaking depekto nito. Natural selection and "survival of the fittest" only try to explain why certain living organisms are no longer here. But do not address the question how they came to being in the first place.The fact na u kept on saying “random” tapos dagdag pa yang “one living organism evolve into another” shows ur lack of understanding of the theory of evolution by natural selection…. Baka mabanggit mo pa “survival of the fittest” ha tas sabihin mo ung malalakas ang tumatalo sa mahihina kaya sila ang nagsusurvive…
Nais ko lang pong ma-educate ang mga na-deceived ng diablo.Consider this…hehehe… bakit ka nag aabala ng idebunk ang evolution??
God is the only explanation to that intelligent design, if you really understand the complexity of it. Simple minds tends to see it like "playdoh", but advanced thinking sees the underlying "computer code".Kahit igrant ko pa sayo for the sake of this argument na mali ang evolution..it does not automatically means na ur god exists and that he created everything or “intelligently designed” everything.. kailangan mo pa din patunayan yan…
Parang ganto kasi yan eh.. like nasa machine shop tayo tapos may isang bilog na object dun… tapos sabi ko bike yun… sabi mo hindi
Whatever or however you want to call the thing is not the argument. Alam po ninyo yan. The issue is the improbability of a simple bike to accidentally reconstruct itself into a more complex working machine.
Accidents cause chaos, not order.
Last edited: