The point of evidence is if it corroborates with other evidences and observation. Kung sa crime scene, hindi ebidensya ang kutsilyo kung walang saksak sa bangkay.Hindi po b evidence ang bible? Thats my point from the very start sir
Well the bible fits in your descriptionThe point of evidence is if it corroborates with other evidences and observation.
So, Bible is evidence of what ba?Well the bible fits in your description
Triggered, how??Hmmm medyo triggered k n siri just explaining things, san mababasa? ok kilala mo b si nimrod sir? Oh d qoh n sasabihin ang verse sir malamang alam nio po iyon kc sabi mo nagbabasa k ng bible.. try mo google sir
And second try to understand the logic siryung brain po is for example childish kmo d try to decode rhe concept ng usapan ntin in a manly manner
And lastly sir wag tayong lumayo s subjectdinamay mo b sila spider man etc eh alam mo n man cnong mga creator nila unless
Bigyan kita sir ng pointers po h book po ng genesis ang time line nila adam and eve do you believe n dun lng iikot ang story eh 2 lng sila, give senses on it sirTriggered, how??
And why are u inserting nimrod now?? Kala ko ba u claim na sa panahon pa lang nina adam and eve madame ng man made gods?? Nimrod’s time came after the flood.. malayo na sa panahon nina adam and eve yan.
I did address it na it a “manly manner”… nacompare ko pa nga na sa brain atleast we can detect it with instruments..unlike ur god…
Kaya nga sinama ko ang mga unicorns and stuff… naniniwala ka ba sa mga yon? Kahit di mo nakikita it does not mean those things dont exists db as u said? Same goes sa ibang gods na “di mo nakikita” din…
Di yan malayo sa subject kasi its just the same thing.. u just happen to believe in ur god.. pero all those things i mentioned can easily fit sa category na nagpapatunay sayo sa god mo…
Unless…
There is no such thing that is a literal creation. Everything only either just exists, was built from what already exist. Even birth is just a biochemical means of building. Either naturally existing, built or born. If there is no creation, then there is no creator, or the need to have one.Sabi qoh nga if wlang creator their is no creation, thats a common thing wlang magic dun kc yun ang flow ng nature,
Wow just existThere is no such thing that is a literal creation. Everything only either just exists, was built from what already exist. Even birth is just a biochemical means of building. Either naturally existing, built or born. If there is no creation, then there is no creator, or the need to have one.
This something out of nothing idea is really built on muddying the definition of words by calling everything as "creation" that appeared from the assumed "nothingness". At paano mong nasabing malinaw ang bible? Iignore mo nlng ba yung mga parts na mali ang nasusulat? O baka naman ikaw nlng magbibigay ng kahulugan para maging tama? Kung ganyan, kahit anong aklat pwede mong ilagay sa pedestal kung saan mo nilagay ang Bibliya. At the end, ang tanong, bakit yung bibliya ang napili mo?
Wow just existThere is no such thing that is a literal creation. Everything only either just exists, was built from what already exist. Even birth is just a biochemical means of building. Either naturally existing, built or born. If there is no creation, then there is no creator, or the need to have one.
This something out of nothing idea is really built on muddying the definition of words by calling everything as "creation" that appeared from the assumed "nothingness". At paano mong nasabing malinaw ang bible? Iignore mo nlng ba yung mga parts na mali ang nasusulat? O baka naman ikaw nlng magbibigay ng kahulugan para maging tama? Kung ganyan, kahit anong aklat pwede mong ilagay sa pedestal kung saan mo nilagay ang Bibliya. At the end, ang tanong, bakit yung bibliya ang napili mo?
Look, think of everything that you surely know that exist in the world. There is no such thing as a "creation made from nothing". Pag gumawa ako ng martilyo, a merely built it from materials a took from the environment. Even biological creatures are made from elements that is already present from the nutrients derived from the food. Even stars are formed from matter that already exist in its surrounding.Wow just existnpakahirap patunayan yn unless nand2 k n 3billion years ago? When you say biochemical then give me proof n by natural process life existed? Khit scientist k p it is very impossible ang gnung proposition? When i stand my ground siempre alam kong ipaliwanag bt d k mag tanong s kapwa ko believer prehas lng kmi ng stand.. if you have a debate give me your proof saka handa kng tayuan pro k lng theory
So madali ba iprove ang position mo? It is you who need to exist 3-billion yrs ago to prove that there is such nothingness.npakahirap patunayan yn unless nand2 k n 3billion years ago?
Paglampas no kasi ng primary school, brainwashed ka na maniwala sa supertitious chracters with higher thoughts. LolHis thoughts are higher than ours,
Nsa primay school pa lang yan stand mo.
Then explain its sir about the compos
Wow just existnpakahirap patunayan yn unless nand2 k n 3billion years ago? When you say biochemical then give me proof n by natural process life existed? Khit scientist k p it is very impossible ang gnung proposition? When i stand my ground siempre alam kong ipaliwanag bt d k mag tanong s kapwa ko believer prehas lng kmi ng stand.. if you have a debate give me your proof saka handa kng tayuan pro k lng theory
Then explain its sir about the compos
Wow just existnpakahirap patunayan yn unless nand2 k n 3billion years ago? When you say biochemical then give me proof n by natural process life existed? Khit scientist k p it is very impossible ang gnung proposition? When i stand my ground siempre alam kong ipaliwanag bt d k mag tanong s kapwa ko believer prehas lng kmi ng stand.. if you have a debate give me your proof saka handa kng tayuan pro k lng theory
Hayz hirap makipag debate s sarado ang utak, explain qoh sir h sabi mo "merely built" ibig sabihin sir energy is applied to make it "even" exist? You need a creator to createLook, think of everything that you surely know that exist in the world. There is no such thing as a "creation made from nothing". Pag gumawa ako ng martilyo, a merely built it from materials a took from the environment. Even biological creatures are made from elements that is already present from the nutrients derived from the food. Even stars are formed from matter that already exist in its surrounding.
Ikaw, give me an example of anything that exist that came from nothing. Ung tunay na creation. I think yan ang mahirap i-prove.
Malamang misunderstood mo ang proposition ng bigbang assuming the theory said the universe came from nothing and came out of existence.. that is not proven. All it said that everything came from a single point, not from "nothing". The universe could already exist before that, just in a different state.
So madali ba iprove ang position mo? It is you who need to exist 3-billion yrs ago to prove that there is such nothingness.
Kaunting science class tayo.
1. Everything is made of matter.
2. According to Einstein's e=mc², matter can be converted into energy.
3. According to thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed.
So if we gather all matter in the universe and turn everything into energy, does that mean it does not exist? No. It is merely converted into something else.
Ito po ay interview ni Einstein nung cia ay 50 yrs of Age,
Hiw did you come up concluding na needed ang creator? Bakit genesis ang source? Bakit hindi harry potter? Bakit hindi biag ni lam-ang?You need a creator to createdming mong sinasabi about s theory of the bigbang evolution pro sabi nga ng mga scientist is the bigbang is cause by a creator, read genesis 1:1-3, ito nga lng tread is need an author to make a forum tapos idea mo its formed naturally?
basic science sir if their is no action their is no reaction,
Actually, mali intindi mo sa storya. Einstein is a theist. Nadeny sya na nag-eexpand ang universe dahil hindi un tugma sa paniniwala nya. He tweaked the formula to match his belief in god and a static universe. He was proven wrong.At wag kang hugot ng hugot ng theory sir, si Einstein at the ends of all his formulas at studies napatunayan nya n God exist. Irrelevant ang theory sir kung wlang proper application.
Birth is a natural proces. May nakita ka bang superstitious "creator" para sabihin mong siya ang may gawa? Bakit ako kailangan mag prove, ikaw itong may claim na hindi immediately obvious sa senses.When you say biochemical then give me proof n by natural process life existed?
Yung word n debunked means hindi npatunayan, well s point of view mo ynHiw did you come up concluding na needed ang creator? Bakit genesis ang source? Bakit hindi harry potter? Bakit hindi biag ni lam-ang?
Action-reaction is a theory about force, not origin. inapalabo mo nanaman e.
Actually, mali intindi mo sa storya. Einstein is a theist. Nadeny sya na nag-eexpand ang universe dahil hindi un tugma sa paniniwala nya. He tweaked the formula to match his belief in god and a static universe. He was proven wrong.
EINSTEIN'S BLUNDER
Isa yang malinaw na halimbawa na theism ang position ng sarado ang utak. Kahit genius hinahatak nito sa maling ideya.
Birth is a natural proces. May nakita ka bang superstitious "creator" para sabihin mong siya ang may gawa? Bakit ako kailangan mag prove, ikaw itong may claim na hindi immediately obvious sa senses.
Yung mga argumento mo napakaluma na, panahon pa ni acquinas. Ilang beses na nadebunk pero ginagamit nyo padin. Yan ang kaibahan ni Einstein sainyo. Marunong siya umamin na nagkamali siya.
Haist.. as usual, play the self-righteous card. Hindi k nmn nkipagdiscussion. All you did was display the shallowness of your position.Yung word n debunked means hindi npatunayan, well s point of view mo ynyun lng I dont want to make this arguement so long..if ever tumanda k ma rerealized mo rin maraming atheist nung nsa deathbed nila ska nila nkita un end of discussion
Haist.. as usual, play the self-righteous card. Hindi k nmn nkipagdiscussion. All you did was display the shallowness of your positi
alam mo sir kung naghahanap k ng healty discussion, dapat nag try ka ring unawaiin at intindhin kung sino at anong stand ng kinakausap mo. the bible is my position, siempre laht ng reason ko at belief ay iikot sa s loob ng bible. kc yun ang reference ko wala ng iba, yung shallowness n sinasabi mo bka ikw yun kc kung ano anong theory binabato mo wala k nmng solid discussion dun puro basic analysis lng from how you learn it. pero mismong bigat ng subject d mo rin naman maipaliwag.. tapos pati faith ng iba kinikwestyon mo? ib ang fiction sa history sir. ang bible hindi books of fictions fyi bible is a solid proof from old to new testaments. at isa dont pretend n my definition ang lht ng binabato mong arguements. kung di mo kyang i defend dapat alm mo kung hanggng saan lng ang pwede mong ilapag sa isang usapan. kc magulo lng di rin namn fruitful ang discussionHaist.. as usual, play the self-righteous card. Hindi k nmn nkipagdiscussion. All you did was display the shallowness of your position.
proof of what boss? proof of christianity?ang bible hindi books of fictions fyi bible is a solid proof from old to new testaments.
The Bible is the holy scripture of the Christian religion, purporting to tell the history of the Earth from its earliest creation to the spread of Christianity in the first century A.D. Both the Old Testament and the New Testament have undergone changes over the centuries, including the the publication of the King James Bible in 1611 and the addition of several books that were discovered later.proof of what boss? proof of christianity?
The Bible is the holy scripture of the Christian religion, purporting to tell the history of the Earth from its earliest creation to the spread of Christianity in the first century A.D. Both the Old Testament and the New Testament have undergone changes over the centuries, including the the publication of the King James Bible in 1611 and the addition of several books that were discovered later.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?