Sino dito yung agnostic?

[plhbg1]

d kta tinatawanan ah haha .. wala lng, natatawa lng ako paps

naisip ko lng, hindi naman pangre-recruit yung sinasabi mo noh? haha

ahaha di ko siya na-recruit, nakapasok na siya dito kaya orientation niya iyan

in fact gusto ko pa nga na i-recruit ninyo muna diyan sa inyo yung mga potential agnostics para maging solid sila

 

[Cerebellum]

ahaha di ko siya na-recruit, nakapasok na siya dito kaya orientation niya iyan

orientation na pala hahahahaha tapos sa mga sunod na araw, training na nyan


may health insurance ba pag sumali sa group niyo? haha

 

[ToothknocK]

atheist here,
natawa lng ako sa nah sabi na religion ang atheism
ang mga atis ay d naniniwala sa dyos kasi wala nmang proof na nag eexist sya.
tsaka hindi pwedeng sabihing walang proof ang mga atis na walang dyos kasi ang burden of proof ay pra dun sa mga nagsasabing nag eexist sya.
atheism is science based, in fact andaming nsa field ng science ang atis like Carl Sagan,Stephen Hawking,Niel DeGrease.
agnostism means hindi ka sure na may dyos pero naniniwala ka pa din,how can u say na science based yan kung hindi ka nga sure in the 1st place?

 

[Cerebellum]

atheist here,
natawa lng ako sa nah sabi na religion ang atheism
ang mga atis ay d naniniwala sa dyos kasi wala nmang proof na nag eexist sya.
tsaka hindi pwedeng sabihing walang proof ang mga atis na walang dyos kasi ang burden of proof ay pra dun sa mga nagsasabing nag eexist sya.
atheism is science based, in fact andaming nsa field ng science ang atis like Carl Sagan,Stephen Hawking,Niel DeGrease.
agnostism means hindi ka sure na may dyos pero naniniwala ka pa din,how can u say na science based yan kung hindi ka nga sure in the 1st place?

pakisagot daw plhbg1

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

Uyyy salamat dito. Hanggang ngayon pa naman ine-explore ko pa rin yung possibilities

For a fresh look towards religion, try mo manood mga lectures ni jordan peterson. Christian padin siya in practice pero meron siyang mga logical take sa iba't ibang belief system. Mejo mas logical.

atheist here,
natawa lng ako sa nah sabi na religion ang atheism
ang mga atis ay d naniniwala sa dyos kasi wala nmang proof na nag eexist sya.
tsaka hindi pwedeng sabihing walang proof ang mga atis na walang dyos kasi ang burden of proof ay pra dun sa mga nagsasabing nag eexist sya.
atheism is science based, in fact andaming nsa field ng science ang atis like Carl Sagan,Stephen Hawking,Niel DeGrease.
agnostism means hindi ka sure na may dyos pero naniniwala ka pa din,how can u say na science based yan kung hindi ka nga sure in the 1st place?

May sense nmn din ung position hnd ka sure. Meron din nmn kasi sa science na mga bagay na never mpprove, at never ma ddisprove. So they chalk it to probability.

 

[plhbg1]

atheist here,
natawa lng ako sa nah sabi na religion ang atheism
ang mga atis ay d naniniwala sa dyos kasi wala nmang proof na nag eexist sya.
tsaka hindi pwedeng sabihing walang proof ang mga atis na walang dyos kasi ang burden of proof ay pra dun sa mga nagsasabing nag eexist sya.
atheism is science based, in fact andaming nsa field ng science ang atis like Carl Sagan,Stephen Hawking,Niel DeGrease.
agnostism means hindi ka sure na may dyos pero naniniwala ka pa din,how can u say na science based yan kung hindi ka nga sure in the 1st place?

just because you don't have proof of its existence doesn't mean its not there, you should find proof of its non-existence as well, in agnosticism we consider them as the unknowns

before the proof for electricity was discovered scientists did not conclude there is no electricity but they have it as unknown

 

[ToothknocK]

For a fresh look towards religion, try mo manood mga lectures ni jordan peterson. Christian padin siya in practice pero meron siyang mga logical take sa iba't ibang belief system. Mejo mas logical.


May sense nmn din ung position hnd ka sure. Meron din nmn kasi sa science na mga bagay na never mpprove, at never ma ddisprove. So they chalk it to probability.

give some example s?

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

give some example s?

Big bang theory. High probability but never proven.

 

[Cerebellum]

luto muna ako popcorn

 

[plhbg1]

Big bang theory. High probability but never proven.

seeing things which are 45 million lightyears away on a telescope is not proof for you?

 

[ToothknocK]

just because you don't have proof of its existence doesn't mean its not there, you should find proof of its non-existence as well, in agnosticism we consider them as the unknowns

before the proof for electricity was discovered scientists did not conclude there is no electricity but they have it as unknown

in science something doesn't exist if there's no proof,
kaya nga may burden of proof kasi u can't have prove of something na di nman nag eexist,
like, if sinabi kong may multo dito sa bahay ko tas sinabi mo nmang wala, sino ang hihingan ng proof ng mga tao kung sino ang tama? dba hihingi sila ng proof dun sa nag sabi na meron? kasi sya ung nag claim?

electricity isn't discovered,it is invented, converted from other energy like fuel and friction, before it was invented electricity doesn't exist.

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

seeing things which are 45 million lightyears away on a telescope is not proof for you?

Sorry hnd ko nakita, saan direction ho ba makikita ung big bang theory sir? Pra makita ko yan nakita mo.

Pero on a a serious note. Inexplain din yan ni Niel degrasse tyson. Big bang theory lng ang best theory na compatable sa physics na meron tayo ngayon, pero walang ni isang seryosong scientist ang magsasabing 100% certain ito, dahil open sila sa idea na may bagong discovery at physics na mas magpapaliwanag nito.

 

[plhbg1]

Sorry hnd ko nakita, saan direction ho ba makikita ung big bang theory sir? Pra makita ko yan nakita mo.

Pero on a a serious note. Inexplain din yan ni Niel degrasse tyson. Big bang theory lng ang best theory na compatable sa physics na meron tayo ngayon, pero walang ni isang seryosong scientist ang magsasabing 100% certain ito, dahil open sila sa idea na may bagong discovery at physics na mas magpapaliwanag nito.

ah gets ko na, you mean scientific theories and laws are true, kaya pala ok lang iyan boss

 

[ToothknocK]

Big bang theory. High probability but never proven.

u confused scientific theories to the word theory,
ang scientific theories ay hindi 'theory' lang.
scientific theories are considered as fact unless proven to be false.

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

u confused scientific theories to the word theory,
ang scientific theories ay hindi 'theory' lang.
scientific theories are considered as fact unless proven to be false.

So edi nasayo ngayon ang burden of proof to prove God theory to be false.

Btw athiest din ako. Just for perspective. I just happen to be interested with human nature, including studying religion, in a logical manner.

 

[ToothknocK]

is god theory a scientific theory?
bigbang is considered as fact kasi yan ang most backed up by evidence,
maooverturn lng yan kung may mas convincing evidence na mapepresent,
yan ang maganda sa science,
evidence based, just like how atheist view on god,
kung may mapepresent na evidence,i will change my view

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

is god theory a scientific theory?
bigbang is considered as fact kasi yan ang most backed up by evidence,
maooverturn lng yan kung may mas convincing evidence na mapepresent,
yan ang maganda sa science,
evidence based, just like how atheist view on god,
kung may mapepresent na evidence,i will change my view

What constitutes a theory scientific?
Wala akong plano baguhin ang view mo.

Dahil atheist din ako. Sabi ko lng nmn valid position ang agnosticsm dahil kahit science may mga bagay na never mpprove. Mababa din probability sakin ng existence of God. But like anyone practicing science properly, you never decide what is a fact unless you prove or disprove a theory.

 

[ToothknocK]

u need several evidence considered as scientific fact (empirical evidence) bago makagawa ng scientific theory where as sa theory about god are based on biases

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

How do you say it is just based on biases?
Did you do the observation yourself?

 

[plhbg1]

So edi nasayo ngayon ang burden of proof to prove God theory to be false.

why would something be proven false if its existence is not proven in the first place?

What constitutes a theory scientific?

there is no such thing as true in science, it only has the most accepted description of something, kaya big bang may be the most accepted as of the moment and it will stay on the throne as long as there is no conflicting theory made