Ikw nagsabi nyan I refer my self to be selective I mean ung sinasabi ikw din ganunIto o ikaw na nag sabi "selective ka din nmn" it means inahalintulad mo ako sayo.ewan ko nalang kung pati ikaw d mo na iintidihan sarili mo.
Mahina nga kasi ebidensya nila mga mukhang pera ka si mga dilawan inggit sa yaman ng marcos yun lng un..May mga kasong bailable. May mga hearing na puwedeng ireset nang ireset. May pera ang mga Marcos para bayaran lahat ng yan.May warrant of arrest ang ilan sa mga kaso, katulad kay Imelda. Pero may pang piyansa sila. Paano mo maipapakulong?
Kaya lng nmn ngpapakita kasi tatakbo..hahaha dilaw yan si len len bkt ng pink..hahaha may pinagtatakpan..hahahaDun ka sa may napatunayan na habang na sa pwesto wag Yung mag papakita lang kapag election.At wag ma papadala sa mga fake news laging mag fact check.
LetLeniLead
Ahhh ganun ba? tagal na pala nya nangangampnyan kac nuon pa mang d pa sya politician tumutulong na sya sa mga mahihirapMahina nga kasi ebidensya nila mga mukhang pera ka si mga dilawan inggit sa yaman ng marcos yun lng un..
Dun nlng ako sa magnanakaw daw kesa naman kay len len na puro lng salita kaya lng tatakbo kasi nautusan lng bka pagnanalo yan si len len malagay din sa pera yung asawa o kaya magpatayo ng rebulto..hahaha
Kaya lng nmn ngpapakita kasi tatakbo..hahaha dilaw yan si len len bkt ng pink..hahaha may pinagtatakpan..hahaha
Di talaga nakakaintindi.Mahina nga kasi ebidensya nila mga mukhang pera ka si mga dilawan inggit sa yaman ng marcos yun lng un..
Dun nlng ako sa magnanakaw daw kesa naman kay len len na puro lng salita kaya lng tatakbo kasi nautusan lng bka pagnanalo yan si len len malagay din sa pera yung asawa o kaya magpatayo ng rebulto..hahaha
Kaya lng nmn ngpapakita kasi tatakbo..hahaha dilaw yan si len len bkt ng pink..hahaha may pinagtatakpan..hahaha
wag mo na ipilit ung piyansa.. eexplain ko ba ulet sau bkit nakakag piyansa ung akusado? hahaDi talaga nakakaintindi.
May warrant of arrest nga. Nakapiyansa lang kaya malaya.
Anong ebidensya pa kailangan?
Gandang source niyan: Blessed shit
Gandang source niyan: Blessed shit
— "𝗞𝗨𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗡𝗔𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗞𝗔𝗪 𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗠𝗚𝗔 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗦, 𝗕𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗧 𝗪𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗡𝗔𝗞𝗨𝗟𝗢𝗡𝗚?"
1. There was no ANTI-PLUNDER LAW during the Marcos' case. (NO RETROACTIVE EFFECT - Hindi maaring hatulan ang mga Marcoses gamit ang 1991 ANTI-PLUNDER LAW)
2. In the 1955 Anti-Ill Gotten Wealth Act (Republic Act 1379) which was the basis of the Marcos case, there was no imprisonment penalty for public officials. The only penalty for such offense is forfeiting all ill-gotten assets which happened to the Marcos' case.(You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.)
3. The Marcoses have ill-gotten wealth. That is the legal truth. The Court has already ruled in several cases on this matter and such decisions are already final. You can disagree with it and are free to have your own opinion, but we need to respect the rulings of the Court.
4. The Swiss Foundation deposits ($658M) was considered ill-gotten wealth by the Supreme Court because the Marcoses failed to justify the lawful acquisition of these assets. (Korte Suprema: G.R. No. 152154 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan)
5. Nahatulan si Imelda Marcos ng Sandiganbayan noong 2018 na GUILTY OF 7 COUNTS OF GRAFT na may parusang 6 years each, or total of 42 years. Agad-agad siyang nagpiyansa kaya hindi na naituloy ang pagkakakulong sa kaniya. Mananatili siyang malaya hangga't hindi pa naaaksyunan ng Korte Suprema ang kaniyang appeal. Ito ay kalayaang mula sa mga karapatan niya sa ilalim ng demokrasya na pinasinayaan ni Pangulong Corazon Aquino. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.)
Sa ngayon, Forfeiture Case at awaiting finality (Imelda's) na lamang ang pinaglalabanan ng mga Marcoses at ng Gobyerno.
Tandaan: Hindi porket hindi nakulong, inosente na. Alamin. Aralin. Mag-isip! (203B)
Gandang source niyan: Blessed shit
— "𝗞𝗨𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗡𝗔𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗞𝗔𝗪 𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗠𝗚𝗔 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗦, 𝗕𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗧 𝗪𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗡𝗔𝗞𝗨𝗟𝗢𝗡𝗚?"
1. There was no ANTI-PLUNDER LAW during the Marcos' case. (NO RETROACTIVE EFFECT - Hindi maaring hatulan ang mga Marcoses gamit ang 1991 ANTI-PLUNDER LAW)
2. In the 1955 Anti-Ill Gotten Wealth Act (Republic Act 1379) which was the basis of the Marcos case, there was no imprisonment penalty for public officials. The only penalty for such offense is forfeiting all ill-gotten assets which happened to the Marcos' case.(You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.)
3. The Marcoses have ill-gotten wealth. That is the legal truth. The Court has already ruled in several cases on this matter and such decisions are already final. You can disagree with it and are free to have your own opinion, but we need to respect the rulings of the Court.
4. The Swiss Foundation deposits ($658M) was considered ill-gotten wealth by the Supreme Court because the Marcoses failed to justify the lawful acquisition of these assets. (Korte Suprema: G.R. No. 152154 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan)
5. Nahatulan si Imelda Marcos ng Sandiganbayan noong 2018 na GUILTY OF 7 COUNTS OF GRAFT na may parusang 6 years each, or total of 42 years. Agad-agad siyang nagpiyansa kaya hindi na naituloy ang pagkakakulong sa kaniya. Mananatili siyang malaya hangga't hindi pa naaaksyunan ng Korte Suprema ang kaniyang appeal. Ito ay kalayaang mula sa mga karapatan niya sa ilalim ng demokrasya na pinasinayaan ni Pangulong Corazon Aquino. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.)
Sa ngayon, Forfeiture Case at awaiting finality (Imelda's) na lamang ang pinaglalabanan ng mga Marcoses at ng Gobyerno.
Tandaan: Hindi porket hindi nakulong, inosente na. Alamin. Aralin. Mag-isip! (203B)
Convicted. May desisyon na ang korte. Ito ilan o:ill gotten wealth tapos dudugsungan ng o ninakaw na yaman haha.
kaya nga nakalaya kc d pa tapos ung kaso ganun lang ka simple yun.. misleading ung d pa naaksyunan ano tulog ung korte??? hahaha..
wag isisi kay bbm ung states tax ung bir at pcgg ang katukin nio haha
BIR OFFICIALS: MARCOS HEIRS CAN’T BE COMPELLED TO PAY P203B TAX DEFICIENCY”
(Manila Bulletin 04-03-2022)
— BIR’s field officials, who requested anonymity, explained that the estate tax is levied on real and personal properties of a dead person and not on the assets owned by his relatives.
— “I can’t recall of any individual being sent to jail for non-payment of the said tax,” one of the regional directors said.
— He said the proper thing to do under the Tax Code and revenue regulations is to seize and sell in public auction the properties of the deceased to settle the indebtedness.
— “That is what we have been doing for years since the death of the former strong man, but the problem nobody was interested in buying them,”
Further action/Notes | |
---|---|
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Criminal |
Case No. | 17287 |
Date Filed | December 18, 1991 |
Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
Disposal | Convicted |
Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
Further action/Notes | |
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Criminal |
Case No. | 17288 |
Date Filed | December 18, 1991 |
Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
Disposal | Convicted |
Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
Further action/Notes | |
---|---|
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Criminal |
Case No. | 17289 |
Date Filed | December 18, 1991 |
Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
Disposal | Convicted |
Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
Further action/Notes | |
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Criminal |
Case No. | 17290 |
Date Filed | December 18, 1991 |
Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
Disposal | Convicted |
Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
Further action/Notes | |
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Criminal |
Case No. | 22867 |
Date Filed | May 9, 1995 |
Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
Disposal | Convicted |
Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
Further action/Notes | |
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Criminal |
Case No. | 22868 |
Date Filed | May 9, 1995 |
Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
Disposal | Convicted |
Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
Further action/Notes | |
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Criminal |
Case No. | 22869 |
Date Filed | May 9, 1995 |
Offense/Petition | Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) |
Disposal | Convicted |
Date Disposed | 11/09/18 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda |
Court | Sandiganbayan |
---|---|
Case Type | Civil |
Case No. | 0141 |
Date Filed | December 17, 1991 |
Offense/Petition | Petition for Forfeiture |
Disposal | Pending |
Date Disposed | |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda and family |
Further action/Notes | (see summary judgments) |
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Civil - Summary Judgment |
Case No. | 0141 |
Date Filed | March 10, 2000 |
Offense/Petition | Petition for Forfeiture (Swiss funds) |
Disposal | Granted |
Date Disposed | 09/19/00 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda and family |
Further action/Notes | Reversed by Sandiganbayan on 01/31/02. Reversal set aside by SC in GR No. 152154 on 07/15/03. |
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Civil - Partial Summary Judgment |
Case No. | 0141 |
Date Filed | July 16, 2004 |
Offense/Petition | Petition for Forfeiture (Arelma assets) |
Disposal | Granted |
Date Disposed | 04/02/09 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda and family |
Further action/Notes | Affirmed by SC in GR No. 189434 on 04/25/12 |
Court | Sandiganbayan |
Case Type | Civil - Partial Summary Judgment |
Case No. | 0141 |
Date Filed | June 24, 2009 |
Offense/Petition | Petition for Forfeiture (Malacañang Jewelry Collection) |
Disposal | Granted |
Date Disposed | 01/13/14 |
Respondent | Marcos, Imelda and family |
Further action/Notes | Affirmed by SC in GR No. 213027 on 01/18/07 |
Further action/Notes | |
---|---|
Court | US - New York and New Jersey courts |
Case Type | Civil |
Case No. | - |
Date Filed | - |
Offense/Petition | Forfeiture of properties in New York and New Jersey |
Disposal | Granted |
Date Disposed | 1986 |
Respondent | Marcos family |
d pa tapos yan idadaan pa yan sa supreme court dun mag kakaron ng final judgement. wag misleading... tulad ng DQ nio kay BBM d pa tapos un idadaan pa un sa supreme court malay nio maiba ung hatol hahaha!Convicted. May desisyon na ang korte. Ito ilan o:
Sandiganbayan:
Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 17287 Date Filed December 18, 1991 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 17288 Date Filed December 18, 1991 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda
Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 17289 Date Filed December 18, 1991 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 17290 Date Filed December 18, 1991 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 22867 Date Filed May 9, 1995 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 22868 Date Filed May 9, 1995 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 22869 Date Filed May 9, 1995 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda
Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Civil Case No. 0141 Date Filed December 17, 1991 Offense/Petition Petition for Forfeiture Disposal Pending Date Disposed Respondent Marcos, Imelda and family Further action/Notes (see summary judgments) Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Civil - Summary Judgment Case No. 0141 Date Filed March 10, 2000 Offense/Petition Petition for Forfeiture (Swiss funds) Disposal Granted Date Disposed 09/19/00 Respondent Marcos, Imelda and family Further action/Notes Reversed by Sandiganbayan on 01/31/02. Reversal set aside by SC in GR No. 152154 on 07/15/03. Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Civil - Partial Summary Judgment Case No. 0141 Date Filed July 16, 2004 Offense/Petition Petition for Forfeiture (Arelma assets) Disposal Granted Date Disposed 04/02/09 Respondent Marcos, Imelda and family Further action/Notes Affirmed by SC in GR No. 189434 on 04/25/12 Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Civil - Partial Summary Judgment Case No. 0141 Date Filed June 24, 2009 Offense/Petition Petition for Forfeiture (Malacañang Jewelry Collection) Disposal Granted Date Disposed 01/13/14 Respondent Marcos, Imelda and family Further action/Notes Affirmed by SC in GR No. 213027 on 01/18/07
Further action/Notes Court US - New York and New Jersey courts Case Type Civil Case No. - Date Filed - Offense/Petition Forfeiture of properties in New York and New Jersey Disposal Granted Date Disposed 1986 Respondent Marcos family
May mga pending pa. Pero ayan meron ding tapos na. Kaya may nabawi, dahil may ninakaw.
gamitan mo kc ng common sense bakit nakakapag piyansa kc ongoing pa ung case hindi dahil madaming pera. pag yan ay may final judgement na d na yan makakapag piyansa period.Convicted. May desisyon na ang korte. Ito ilan o:
Sandiganbayan:
Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 17287 Date Filed December 18, 1991 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 17288 Date Filed December 18, 1991 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda
Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 17289 Date Filed December 18, 1991 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 17290 Date Filed December 18, 1991 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 22867 Date Filed May 9, 1995 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 22868 Date Filed May 9, 1995 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda Further action/Notes Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Criminal Case No. 22869 Date Filed May 9, 1995 Offense/Petition Vio. of RA 3019, 3(h) Disposal Convicted Date Disposed 11/09/18 Respondent Marcos, Imelda
Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Civil Case No. 0141 Date Filed December 17, 1991 Offense/Petition Petition for Forfeiture Disposal Pending Date Disposed Respondent Marcos, Imelda and family Further action/Notes (see summary judgments) Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Civil - Summary Judgment Case No. 0141 Date Filed March 10, 2000 Offense/Petition Petition for Forfeiture (Swiss funds) Disposal Granted Date Disposed 09/19/00 Respondent Marcos, Imelda and family Further action/Notes Reversed by Sandiganbayan on 01/31/02. Reversal set aside by SC in GR No. 152154 on 07/15/03. Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Civil - Partial Summary Judgment Case No. 0141 Date Filed July 16, 2004 Offense/Petition Petition for Forfeiture (Arelma assets) Disposal Granted Date Disposed 04/02/09 Respondent Marcos, Imelda and family Further action/Notes Affirmed by SC in GR No. 189434 on 04/25/12 Court Sandiganbayan Case Type Civil - Partial Summary Judgment Case No. 0141 Date Filed June 24, 2009 Offense/Petition Petition for Forfeiture (Malacañang Jewelry Collection) Disposal Granted Date Disposed 01/13/14 Respondent Marcos, Imelda and family Further action/Notes Affirmed by SC in GR No. 213027 on 01/18/07
Further action/Notes Court US - New York and New Jersey courts Case Type Civil Case No. - Date Filed - Offense/Petition Forfeiture of properties in New York and New Jersey Disposal Granted Date Disposed 1986 Respondent Marcos family
May mga pending pa. Pero ayan meron ding tapos na. Kaya may nabawi, dahil may ninakaw.
i- search mo kaya yung case number.d pa tapos yan idadaan pa yan sa supreme court dun mag kakaron ng final judgement. wag misleading... tulad ng DQ nio kay BBM d pa tapos un idadaan pa un sa supreme court malay nio maiba ung hatol hahaha!
ha sandigan bayan yan d yan supreme court... wala pang final judgement... ipakita mo link ng supreme court. back read ka dun sa 203 billion haha.i- search mo kaya yung case number.
convicted na nga. final na. guilty.
wala pa yung estate tax diyan partida. ayun final and executory na.
ikaw ang misleading. mas marunong ka pa sa korte.
ha sandigan bayan yan d yan supreme court... wala pang final judgement... ipakita mo link ng supreme court. back read ka dun sa 203 billion h
kelan pa nagkaron ng final judgement ang sandigang bayan?? haha! so tanggaling na natin ang supreme court?? haha nway basahin mo ung pinost ko dun sa propaganda mong 203B..ifact check mo kung ayaw mo maniwalai- search mo kaya yung case number.
convicted na nga. final na. guilty.
wala pa yung estate tax diyan partida. ayun final and executory na.
ikaw ang misleading. mas marunong ka pa sa korte.
Baka limit toi- search mo kaya yung case number.
convicted na nga. final na. guilty.
wala pa yung estate tax diyan partida. ayun final and executory na.
ikaw ang misleading. mas marunong ka pa sa korte.
Paki fackcheck narin kung totooBaka limit to
Sa gobyerno ba pera ginamit dito?
follow your heart , char!di ko pa alam sino iboboto ko.