What's new

Trivia Jesus ChristEvidence That He Walked the Earth

Gentleman007

Forum Expert
Elite
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Posts
3,557
Reaction
7,218
Points
2,570
DO YOU believe in the existence of the man named Albert Einstein? You may readily answer yes, but why? Most people have not personally met him. Yet, reliable reports of his accomplishments prove that he did exist. The influence of his existence is felt through scientific applications of his discoveries. For instance, many benefit from electricity generated by nuclear energy, the release of which is closely linked with the application of Einstein’s famous equation, E=mc2 (energy equals mass times the speed of light squared).

The same reasoning applies to Jesus Christ, admittedly the most influential man in history. What was written about him and the visible evidence of the influence he wielded prove beyond doubt that he did exist. As interesting as the recent archaeological finding of the James inscription, described in the preceding article, may be, Jesus’ historicity does not depend on this or any other artifact. The fact is, we can find evidence of Jesus’ existence in what secular historians wrote about him and his followers.

Testimony of Historians

For instance, consider the testimony of Flavius Josephus, a first-century Jewish historian who was a Pharisee. He referred to Jesus Christ in the book Jewish Antiquities. Although some doubt the authenticity of the first reference where Josephus mentioned Jesus as the Messiah, Professor Louis H. Feldman of Yeshiva University says that few have doubted the genuineness of the second reference. There Josephus said: “[Ananus the high priest] convened the judges of the Sanhedrin and brought before them a man named James, the brother of Jesus who was called the Christ.” (Jewish Antiquities, XX, 200) Yes, a Pharisee, a member of the sect many of whose adherents were avowed enemies of Jesus, acknowledged the existence of “James, the brother of Jesus.”

The influence of Jesus’ existence was felt through the activities of his followers. When the apostle Paul was imprisoned in Rome about 59 C.E., the principal men of the Jews told him: “As regards this sect it is known to us that everywhere it is spoken against.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) They called Jesus’ disciples “this sect.” If they were everywhere spoken against, secular historians would likely report about them, would they not?

Tacitus, born about 55 C.E. and considered one of the world’s greatest historians, mentioned the Christians in his Annals. In the account about Nero’s blaming the great fire of Rome in 64 C.E. on them, he wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus.” The details of this account match the information regarding the Jesus of the Bible.

Another writer who commented on Jesus’ followers was Pliny the Younger, the governor of Bithynia. In about the year 111 C.E., Pliny wrote to Emperor Trajan, asking how to handle Christians. People who were falsely accused of being Christians, wrote Pliny, would repeat an invocation to the gods and worship the statue of Trajan, just to prove that they were not Christians. Pliny continued: “There is no forcing, it is said, those who are really Christians, into any of these compliances.” That testifies to the reality of the existence of the Christ, whose followers were prepared to give their lives for their belief in him.

After summarizing the references to Jesus Christ and his followers by the historians of the first two centuries, The Encyclopædia Britannica (2002 edition) concludes: “These independent accounts prove that in ancient times even the opponents of Christianity never doubted the historicity of Jesus, which was disputed for the first time and on inadequate grounds at the end of the 18th, during the 19th, and at the beginning of the 20th centuries.”

Testimony of Jesus’ Followers

“The New Testament supplies nearly all the evidence for a historical reconstruction of Jesus’ life and fate and for the earliest Christian interpretations of his significance,” says The Encyclopedia Americana. Skeptics may not accept the Bible as evidence of Jesus’ existence. Yet, two lines of reasoning based on Scriptural accounts particularly help to establish that Jesus actually walked the earth.

As we noted, Einstein’s great theories prove his existence. Similarly, Jesus’ teachings prove the reality of his existence. Take for example the Sermon on the Mount, a well-known discourse that Jesus gave. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) The apostle Matthew wrote of the impact of that sermon: “The crowds were astounded at his way of teaching; for he was teaching them as a person having authority.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Regarding the effect the sermon has had on people over the centuries, Professor Hans Dieter Betz noted: “The influences exerted by the Sermon on the Mount generally far transcend the borderlines of Judaism and Christianity, or even Western culture.” He added that this sermon has “a peculiarly universalistic appeal.”

Consider the following concise and practical words of wisdom found in the Sermon on the Mount: “Whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other also to him.” “Take good care not to practice your righteousness in front of men.” “Never be anxious about the next day, for the next day will have its own anxieties.” “Do not . . . throw your pearls before swine.” “Keep on asking, and it will be given you.” “All things . . . that you want men to do to you, you also must likewise do to them.” “Go in through the narrow gate.” “By their fruits you will recognize them.” “Every good tree produces fine fruit.”—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

No doubt you have heard some of these expressions or the gist of them. Perhaps they have become proverbs in your language. These are all taken from the Sermon on the Mount. The influence that this sermon has on many peoples and cultures eloquently testifies to the existence of “the great teacher.”

Let us imagine that someone fabricated a figure called Jesus Christ. Suppose that person was clever enough to come up with the teachings credited to Jesus in the Bible. Would he not contrive to make Jesus and his teachings as palatable as possible to people in general? Yet, the apostle Paul observed: “Both the Jews ask for signs and the Greeks look for wisdom; but we preach Christ impaled, to the Jews a cause for stumbling but to the nations foolishness.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) The message of Christ impaled was attractive neither to the Jews nor to the nations. That was, though, the Christ that first-century Christians proclaimed. Why the depiction of the Christ impaled? The only satisfactory explanation would be that the writers of the Christian Greek Scriptures recorded the truth about Jesus’ life and death.

Another line of reasoning supporting Jesus’ historicity is found in the untiring preaching of his teachings by his followers. Only some 30 years after Jesus started his ministry, Paul could say that the good news “was preached in all creation that is under heaven.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Yes, Jesus’ teachings spread throughout the ancient world despite opposition. Paul, who was himself persecuted as a Christian, wrote: “If Christ has not been raised up, our preaching is certainly in vain, and our faith is in vain.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) If preaching a Christ who had not been resurrected would be in vain, preaching a Christ who had never existed would be even more in vain. As we read in the report by Pliny the Younger, first-century Christians were willing to die for their belief in Christ Jesus. They risked their lives for Christ because he was real; he had walked the earth and had lived as the Gospel accounts record.

You Have Seen Proof

Belief in the resurrection of Jesus Christ was the prerequisite for Christian preaching. In your mind’s eye, you too can envision the resurrected Jesus by seeing the impact he is making today.

Just before Jesus was impaled, he gave a grand prophecy about his future presence. He also indicated that he would be resurrected and would sit at God’s right hand awaiting the time to deal with his enemies. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Thereafter, he would take action and oust Satan and his demons from the heavens.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

When would all of that happen? Jesus gave his disciples ‘the sign of his presence and of the conclusion of the system of things.’ The sign to identify his invisible presence included great wars, food shortages, earthquakes, the appearance of false prophets, an increase of lawlessness, and severe pestilences. Such calamitous events were to be expected, for the ouster of Satan the Devil would mean “woe for the earth.” The Devil has come down to the vicinity of the earth “having great anger, knowing he has a short period of time.” In addition, the sign includes the preaching of the good news of the Kingdom “in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations.”—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle that fit together, the things that Jesus prophesied have occurred. Since the outbreak of World War I in 1914, we have seen the composite evidence of the invisible presence of Jesus Christ. He is reigning as the King of God’s Kingdom and is wielding tremendous influence. That you have this magazine in your hand is evidence that the Kingdom preaching work is being carried out today.

To appreciate further the effect of Jesus’ existence, you need to study the Bible. Why not ask Jehovah’s Witnesses about the details of Jesus’ presence?
 
anong sinasabi mong evidence lahat ng sinabi mo theory at speculation

common sense lang kung may evidence na talaga as in SOLID EVIDENCE bakit may mga ibang religion at mga aethist pa?

isip isip din pag may oras

kalat ka ng kalat ng fake news
 
wag mo gamitin si einstein sa pag justify ng sinasabi mo theory lang sinasabi nya tungkol sa god nyo walang ebidensya, di komo scientist si einstein maniniwala kana sa lahat ng THEORIES nya

eto si stephen hawking naniniwala sa aliens ibig sabihin ba maniniwala ka din sa alien?

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
 
wala ako sinabi na naniniwala ako sa lahat ng theories nya.. ginamit ko lang halimbawa yung mga naiambag nya para patunayan na nabuhay talaga sya, ganun din si Jesus, makikita parin sa bible yung mga ginawa at mga itinuro nya na nagpapatunay na nabuhay talaga sya dito sa mundo...
 
kung may ebidensya na talga na nabuhay nga talaga yang christ nyo palagay mo meron pa mag dududa? ginagwa nyo naman obob mga tao eh
 
[XX='Yanzki606, c: 1073500, m: 1345216'][/XX] "I used to think communication was the key until I realized comprehension is. You can communicate all you want with someone, but if they don't understand you, it's silent chaos." - Unknown :) (Or if they don't WANT to understand you, it's silent chaos o_O)
 
@Yanzki606.."I used to think communication was the key until I realized @B..omprehension[/B] is. You can @B..ommunicate[/B] all you want with someone, but if they don@t ..B]understand[/B] you, it@s silent ..haos." - Unknown :)
naintindihan mo bayan quote na yan sir? para sayo yan
 
naintindihan mo bayan quote na yan sir? para sayo yan

Binasa at naintindihan mo po ba yung post ni Gentleman sir? Kasi po nag focus ka lang dun kay Einstein.. Then sinabi mo to...

common sense lang kung may evidence na talaga as in SOLID EVIDENCE bakit may mga ibang religion at mga aethist pa?

isip isip din pag may oras

1. Dahil hindi ka naman po naniniwala sa bible, di mo tuloy maunawaan na sinabi mismo ni Jesus na darating ang panahon, maraming religion ang lilitaw na gagamitin ang pangalan mismo ni Jesus, PERO mga hindi totoo yun, tas saka sinabi ni Jesus yung paraan kung pano makikilala yung tunay na tagasunod niya. Kita mo siguro yan, san ka man tumingin na lugar may mga religion signage puro "Jesus" or related sa pangalan na yan nagsisimula diba? O kahit hindi sa pangalan ng religion nila, pero yung "paniniwala" po nila ay puro kay Jesus naka center.

2. Specific na inihula din ni Jesus na sabay tutubo sa last days yung trigo at masamang damo. Kung hindi mo naiintindihan yan, siguro dahil di mo pinag-aaralan or ayaw mo pag-aralan, problema mo na yon sir. Pero kami kasi naiintindihan namin yan kaya hindi kami nagtataka kung bakit may ibang religion sa ngayon.

Yang dalawang iyan ang ilan sa dahilan kung bakit may ibang religion sa ngayon kahit na totoong nabuhay si Jesus.

Then, sinabi mo to...

kung may ebidensya na talga na nabuhay nga talaga yang christ nyo palagay mo meron pa mag dududa? ginagwa nyo naman obob mga tao eh

Kahit nga mga relatives ni Jesus noon hindi naniwala sa kaniya noong una, kahit yung ibang jews noon at mga leader ng religion hindi rin naniwala e, pano pa yung ibang tao sa ngayon. Pero okay lang yun ;)

Kaya ko sinabi yang quote na yan. Kahit sino pa kausapin mo, kung hindi mo naman uunawain yung sinasabi sayo or ayaw mong unawain yung sinasabi sayo, useless lang yun sir. Hehe
 
Binasa at naintindihan mo po ba yung post ni Gentleman sir? Kasi po nag focus ka lang dun kay Einstein.. Then sinabi mo to...



1. Dahil hindi ka naman po naniniwala sa bible, di mo tuloy maunawaan na sinabi mismo ni Jesus na darating ang panahon, maraming religion ang lilitaw na gagamitin ang pangalan mismo ni Jesus, PERO mga hindi totoo yun, tas saka sinabi ni Jesus yung paraan kung pano makikilala yung tunay na tagasunod niya. Kita mo siguro yan, san ka man tumingin na lugar may mga religion signage puro "Jesus" or related sa pangalan na yan nagsisimula diba? O kahit hindi sa pangalan ng religion nila, pero yung "paniniwala" po nila ay puro kay Jesus naka center.

2. Specific na inihula din ni Jesus na sabay tutubo sa last days yung trigo at masamang damo. Kung hindi mo naiintindihan yan, siguro dahil di mo pinag-aaralan or ayaw mo pag-aralan, problema mo na yon sir. Pero kami kasi naiintindihan namin yan kaya hindi kami nagtataka kung bakit may ibang religion sa ngayon.

Yang dalawang iyan ang ilan sa dahilan kung bakit may ibang religion sa ngayon kahit na totoong nabuhay si Jesus.

Then, sinabi mo to...



Kahit nga mga relatives ni Jesus noon hindi naniwala sa kaniya noong una, kahit yung ibang jews noon at mga leader ng religion hindi rin naniwala e, pano pa yung ibang tao sa ngayon. Pero okay lang yun ;)

Kaya ko sinabi yang quote na yan. Kahit sino pa kausapin mo, kung hindi mo naman uunawain yung sinasabi sayo or ayaw mong unawain yung sinasabi sayo, useless lang yun sir. Hehe
naririnig mo ba at naiintidihan mga sinasabi mo? isa lang naman hinihingi ko EBIDENSYA

di yung mga OPINYON ng mga nagmamagaling na wala naman basehan ang mga sinasabi

kita nyo naman sa title ng thread EVIDENCE THAT CHRIST WALKED THE EARTH? nasan ebidensya? puro fake news

kaya kitang kita sa mga statements nyo na talagang NILILINLANG nyo ang mga tao kase wala naman talaga kayo EBIDENSYA TAMA?
 
di ako mag rereact kung ang sinasabi nyo sana CHRIST WALKED THE EARTH kaso may mga pinagsasabi pa kayong EVIDENCE na wala naman MINIMISLEAD nyo mga tao
 
naririnig mo ba at naiintidihan mga sinasabi mo? isa lang naman hinihingi ko EBIDENSYA

di yung mga OPINYON ng mga nagmamagaling na wala naman basehan ang mga sinasabi

kita nyo naman sa title ng thread EVIDENCE THAT CHRIST WALKED THE EARTH? nasan ebidensya? puro fake news

kaya kitang kita sa mga statements nyo na talagang NILILINLANG nyo ang mga tao kase wala naman talaga kayo EBIDENSYA TAMA?

Anong klaseng "evidence" ba ang gusto mo makita sir kasi? Photograph niya? :unsure:

I think sinabi naman sa thread po na may mga historians na nag banggit ng tungkol kay Jesus Christ?

Saka ang mga sinabi ko na yan ni-quote mo ay sagot yan para sa mga sinasabi mong "kung totoong nabuhay siya bakit ang daming religion chuchu?". Sinagot ko lang yon kasi hindi naman nakakapagtaka yan kung alam mo ang sinasabi ng bible jan. Kaya kami, di namin ginagawang excuse yan. Hehe

Tungkol sa evidence, based sa reference ni Gentleman ay may mga "historians" na kinikilala din naman ng mga tao ngayon na nag "exist", not one, not two, but three kung di ako nagkakamali, at nabuhay yang mga yan sa magkakaibang lugar I think? Pero binanggit parin nila si Jesus or "part ng mga nagawa" ni Jesus. :)
 
Anong klaseng "evidence" ba ang gusto mo makita sir kasi? Photograph niya? :unsure:

I think sinabi naman sa thread po na may mga historians na nag banggit ng tungkol kay Jesus Christ?

Saka ang mga sinabi ko na yan ni-quote mo ay sagot yan para sa mga sinasabi mong "kung totoong nabuhay siya bakit ang daming religion chuchu?". Sinagot ko lang yon kasi hindi naman nakakapagtaka yan kung alam mo ang sinasabi ng bible jan. Kaya kami, di namin ginagawang excuse yan. Hehe

Tungkol sa evidence, based sa reference ni Gentleman ay may mga "historians" na kinikilala din naman ng mga tao ngayon na nag "exist", not one, not two, but three kung di ako nagkakamali, at nabuhay yang mga yan sa magkakaibang lugar I think? Pero binanggit parin nila si Jesus or "part ng mga nagawa" ni Jesus. :)
chuchu ka ng chuchu sinasabi ko any remains that would prove anyone in the bible bago mo sabihin matagal na kase nangyari yung na decompose na isipin mo kung ano mas matagal dinosaur na milyon milyong taon na nakakita ng evidence diba?

so at least a little common sense bago mag comment

mag post ka ng link ng mga sinasabi mo isa ka din eh puro speculations mga sinasabi mo na galing sa ibang tao at walang evidence

again and again kung meron man kayo proof wala ng hindi naniniwala sa diyos

sus maryosep ganun kasimple
 

Similar threads

Back
Top