What's new

The physical Death Of Jesus

eliza20

Eternal Poster
Established
Joined
Oct 17, 2017
Posts
973
Reaction
259
Points
288
This is what the actual death of Jesus would have looked like if we are to be realistic. His death is not depicted in the movies as to what most likely would have actually happened in the days of Roman Crucifixion. This article is realistically more of what took place that infamous day.

(The physical Death Of Jesus )

“In 1986, The American Medical Association published an article titled "The Physical Death of Jesus Christ". It details the entire process of Jesus' trial to His death on the cross. In Luke 22, before Jesus is arrested, it is written that He was in great distress & sweating blood. Although rare, it is recognized as Hematidrosis, caused by high amounts of stress.

At the time, the crucifixion was considered the worst death for the worst of criminals. But this is not all Jesus faced. He endured whipping so severe that it tore the flesh from His body. He was beaten so horrific that His face was torn & His beard ripped. A crown of thorns, 2-3 inches long cut deeply into His scalp. The leather whip used to flog Him had tiny iron balls & sharp bones. The balls caused internal injuries while the sharp bones ripped open His flesh. His skeletal muscles, veins, & bowels we're exposed, causing major blood loss. Most men do not survive this kind of torture. After Jesus was severely flogged, He was forced to carry His own cross while people mocked & spat on Him.

Crucifixion was a process meant to instill excruciating pain, creating a slow & agonizing death. Nails as long as 8 inches were driven into Jesus' wrists & feet. The Roman soldiers knew the tendon in the wrists would tear & break, forcing Jesus to use His back muscles to support Himself to breathe. Imagine the struggle, the pain, the courage..Jesus endured this reality for 3 hours!

The Gospel of John writes that after Jesus' death, a Roman soldier pierced His side with a spear & blood & water came out. Scientists explain that from hypovolemic shock, the rapid heartrate causes fluid to gather in the sack around the lungs & heart. The gathering of fluid in the membrane around the heart is called Pericardial effusion & the lungs, Pleural effusion.

To the world, Christianity is as foolish as it can get. They believe it's for the weak. But when you are confronted by the reality of the cross, it's clearly not a pretty sight. It is brutal & horrific. This is the weight Jesus carried. The weight of the sins of the world, all so that we can live. God's wrath is fully satisfied in Jesus. This is what it took. Jesus is “God among us” in the flesh. Jesus is our Savior. Jesus loves you so much, He went through this spiritual and physical punishment for your sins and mine. May His boundless love and grace touch the depths of your heart. Clifford E Taylor



FB_IMG_1711433663228.jpg
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Ang pagkakaalam ko ay Christian is for the poor. Hindi ko masasabi na for the weak. Siguro ata na tinawag na 'weak' dahil karamihan ay mahihirap. Pulitika po kase nangyari. Diba, ang mga Pagano noon lalo from the government - may mga philosopher at scholar sila niyan. Uhm. Sabihin natin na matatalino kung baga and as far as na reremember ko ay meron reason why impossible sa kanila ang Christianism.

But siyempre, lumalawak ang Christianism, hindi na siya for the poor dahil kahit ang mga rich people ay naniniwala na kay Jesus na rin.

Ang Christian kase is kapag something bad happen, they would think na there is a supernatural force na hindi kontrol and so, it is like paubaya na lang kung sino ang may gawa. Like for example, meron nangyari masama, naghirap sila at pagkatapos ay walang makain or nag suffer sila dahil isa sa kanila ay namatay ang kanilang mahal sa buhay and because, they can't do anything and so, they will pray na lang to their God up above.

Kaya, natawag na Christian is for the poor and kahit ngayon, meron pa rin, like meron bible verse na keyso mapupunta raw sa hell ang mayaman na tao at mapupunta daw sa langit ang tao na mahirap- something ganun ang naaalala ko. Pansin niyo yun? Actually, apply pa rin siya in real life situation although meron na rin tao na rational na mag-isip at naiinterpret na nila sa bible na sabi na ayos naman daw magpayaman sa Christian God.

And then, ang tungkol sa Roman, pulitika din siya. Yung pananakop kase ng Roman diba? Pagkatapos Roman ang meron kontrol. So nang dumating si Jesus, ang mga naniniwala sa kanya at sumunod sa kanya, umaasa silang lahat na si Jesus ang magliligtas sa kanila sa kamay ng mga Romans. Si Jesus nagsabi na magmahalan raw, magpatawad....... -same siya ni Jose Rizal. Yung nanakop sa atin ang spaniards at pagkatapos, yung mga Rizalista naman ay iniisip nila na si Jose Rizal ang naging savior po nila sapagkat si Rizal ang resulta kung bakit nakawala tayo sa kamay ng espanyol.

Anyway, myth pa rin sa akin si Jesus Christ kahit naipaliwanag ko po siya. Ang other beliefs pati ang kanya, same silang lahat na meron heavenly beings. Iba-iba nga lang ang mga itsura nila. As in. Hindi ko alam kung based on imagination or meron totoo tao na Jesus pero in-associate siya sa other Pagan God katulad ni Horus or meron totoo tao na Jesus pero nagdagdag lang ng fictional story and so on and so forth. Hindi natin alam. Basta ang atin, mag-faith na lang ang gusto mag-faith at huwag maniwala kung hindi naman ramdam. Yun lang yun.​
 
Last edited:
Mis leaded ka Ashera Godless​

Ah. Ganun ba? Huwag ka maniwala. Ganun lang ka-simple yun. Maniwala ka kay TS. Huwag sa akin. Nagbahagi lang ako dahil nagbibigay siya ng inpormasyon so ako din, nagbigay din. Siya, theist. Ako nasa non-religion sect. Hindi ko pwede sabihin na truth kung ang nakakatapat ko ay does not feel anything, dahil truth ay subjective lang siya.

Actually, ang mamimislead lang ang mga tao ay less faith lamang kaya nga sabi ko, mag-faith na lang ang gusto mag-faith at huwag maniwala kung hindi naman ramdam.​
 
Back
Top