Trivia If God didn't exist, how do atheists explain that water freezes at exactly 0C and boil at 100C? Seems like a proof of intelligent design.

[plhbg1]

Then anu meaning ng evolution sayo madam... And fyi hindi ako nag insist na yan ang meaning ng evolution science ang nagsabi nyan...

ehehe that science in your grade 4 said it, kaya nga sabi ko general sciences teacher lang andun who has no concentrated training in science except religion that asserts the invented interpretation of evolution

for your request just read post #31 which you obviously skipped to listen

 

[aaron_joshua]

Hindi mo kailangan ng explanation kung may Diyos ba o hindi. **** lang nagtatanong nyan. HAHA

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

Hindi mo kailangan ng explanation kung may Diyos ba o hindi. **** lang nagtatanong nyan. HAHA

Pano mo nasabi? Dahil common sense na ang maniwala? (Tap common sense for details) hahaha

 

[aaron_joshua]

Pano mo nasabi? Dahil common sense na ang maniwala? (Tap common sense for details) hahaha

B O B O yung may asterisk hahaha

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

B O B O yung may asterisk hahaha

Alam ko.

 

[plhbg1]

Hindi mo kailangan ng explanation kung may Diyos ba o hindi. **** lang nagtatanong nyan. HAHA

oo nga, tiwala lang talaga ang kailangan hahahahatay na tiwalang iyan

 

[NiamAva]

Kahit nga ang lion at tiger malayo na ang pagitan ng dna, pero we can obviously say na galing sila same common ancestor. Ang kaibahan nila sa tao, hindi sila naooffend pag sinabihan sila na galing sila sa isa't isa, at hindi nila hahanapin ang missing link nila..

Dami mu namang alam madam di mu pa kasi deretsuhin eh... Ok ganito ako naniniwala ako sa bible na ang tao ay ginawa ni god na tao na agad... Ikaw ba anu pinaniniwalaan mo san galing ang tao or pano naging tao ang tao..

Kahit nga ang lion at tiger malayo na ang pagitan ng dna, pero we can obviously say na galing sila same common ancestor. Ang kaibahan nila sa tao, hindi sila naooffend pag sinabihan sila na galing sila sa isa't isa, at hindi nila hahanapin ang missing link nila..

Naku po mas lalung malayo po ang theory nyo po... Need po yung missing link na yan para maprove po ang theory of evolution po eh...

 

[plhbg1]

Need po yung missing link na yan para maprove po ang theory of evolution po eh...

haha hindi iyan to prove evolution kundi to prove na tao galing unggoy, that missing link is for people who defines evolution as tao galing unggoy, the fossils will never link tao to unggoy kasi di naman talaga galing ang tao sa unggoy and that link will always be missing in the analysis of fossils

those idiots should know the following:
1. There have been many anthropoidal and Human species that are not ancestral to us. They diverged from our line at some point, thrived, then died off. (weaker variants of humans from different ancestor)
2. We are not "descended" from apes. Apes and Humans descended from a common ancestor. Saying Chimpanzees and Humans are closely related does NOT mean we evolved from them, but alongside them.
3. Every fossil found in the Human record has fit precisely with the predictions set forth in Evolutionary science. This means that every time we find something new, it always strengthens the argument for Evolution.

 

[NiamAva]

haha hindi iyan to prove evolution kundi to prove na tao galing unggoy, that missing link is for people who defines evolution as tao galing unggoy, the fossils will never link tao to unggoy kasi di naman talaga galing ang tao sa unggoy and that link will always be missing in the analysis of fossils

those idiots should know the following:
1. There have been many anthropoidal and Human species that are not ancestral to us. They diverged from our line at some point, thrived, then died off. (weaker variants of humans from different ancestor)
2. We are not "descended" from apes. Apes and Humans descended from a common ancestor. Saying Chimpanzees and Humans are closely related does NOT mean we evolved from them, but alongside them.
3. Every fossil found in the Human record has fit precisely with the predictions set forth in Evolutionary science. This means that every time we find something new, it always strengthens the argument for Evolution.

haha hindi iyan to prove evolution kundi to prove na tao galing unggoy, that missing link is for people who defines evolution as tao galing unggoy, the fossils will never link tao to unggoy kasi di naman talaga galing ang tao sa unggoy and that link will always be missing in the analysis of fossils

those idiots should know the following:
1. There have been many anthropoidal and Human species that are not ancestral to us. They diverged from our line at some point, thrived, then died off. (weaker variants of humans from different ancestor)
2. We are not "descended" from apes. Apes and Humans descended from a common ancestor. Saying Chimpanzees and Humans are closely related does NOT mean we evolved from them, but alongside them.
3. Every fossil found in the Human record has fit precisely with the predictions set forth in Evolutionary science. This means that every time we find something new, it always strengthens the argument for Evolution.

Lets say na ganyan nga tumakno ang evolution.. di parin nyan mapapatuanyan na walang creation na nangyari kasi kung ibabalik ang oras dyan eh ang magiging tanung parin dyan eh before nag evolve mga ancestors natin eh anu sila at san sila nanggaling... Malabo talaga ang evolution...

 

[plhbg1]

Lets say na ganyan nga tumakno ang evolution.. di parin nyan mapapatuanyan na walang creation na nangyari kasi kung ibabalik ang oras dyan eh ang magiging tanung parin dyan eh before nag evolve mga ancestors natin eh anu sila at san sila nanggaling... Malabo talaga ang evolution...

evolution does not describe the origin of life, it only describes the changes that living things undergo, if you want to know the origin of life it belongs to another scientific theory which is abiogenesis and mind you the carbon dating tests tells us that those fossils are dated older than 6000 years which means your bible is soooooo wrong

 

[NiamAva]

evolution does not describe the origin of life, it only describes the changes that living things undergo, if you want to know the origin of life it belongs to another scientific theory which is abiogenesis and mind you the carbon dating tests tells us that those fossils are dated older than 6000 years which means your bible is soooooo wrong

Wait lang ah check ku lang sa bible gaano na katanda ang earth...

 

[plhbg1]

Wait lang ah check ku lang sa bible gaano na katanda ang earth...

sige nga dahil wala daw sa bible yung bilyon bilyong taon eh

 

[Arlertz]

evolution does not describe the origin of life, it only describes the changes that living things undergo, if you want to know the origin of life it belongs to another scientific theory which is abiogenesis and mind you the carbon dating tests tells us that those fossils are dated older than 6000 years which means your bible is soooooo wrong

fossils of what?

 

[plhbg1]

fossils of what?

fossils of living things

 

[Arlertz]

fossils of living things

specifically what living things?

 

[plhbg1]

specifically what living things?

all of living things, they don't chose what specific fossils to find

 

[Arlertz]

all of living things, they don't chose what specific fossils to find

Bakit mo po nabanggit yung 6000 years? San mo po nakuha yan at sino may sabi?

 

[plhbg1]

Bakit mo po nabanggit yung 6000 years? San mo po nakuha yan at sino may sabi?

sa mga ages daw yun ng characters na nasa bible plus the 2000 years na based on christ's life, but the main point is never umabot ng bilyon bilyong taon ang nasa bible

 

[Arlertz]

sa mga ages daw yun ng characters na nasa bible plus the 2000 years na based on christ's life, but the main point is never umabot ng bilyon bilyong taon ang nasa bible

Aaahh. Yan po ba yung sinasabi ng mga creationist at yung mga naniniwala sa kagaya nila na 6000 years lang nabuo yung earth at pati narin yung mga pangyayari sa bible?

 

[plhbg1]

Aaahh. Yan po ba yung sinasabi ng mga creationist at yung mga naniniwala sa kagaya nila na 6000 years lang nabuo yung earth at pati narin yung mga pangyayari sa bible?

siguro sila yun, di rin ako interested sa 6000, mas interested ako sa bilyon bilyong years na wala daw sa bible