What's new

I Told You So Part 3

ZummerSoltice

Forum Expert
Elite
Joined
May 26, 2022
Posts
8,596
Solutions
18
Reaction
12,251
Points
3,795
Excerpts for today's column: "Duterte rectified Aquino 3rd's colossal blunder"

Read full article: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

THE Chinese Embassy the other day confirmed that the People's Republic of China and former president Rodrigo Duterte agreed on a "temporary special arrangement" to allow small-scale fishing around the disputed Spratly Islands, but restricted access for military, coast guard and other official planes and ships to the 12-nautical-mile limit of its occupied island's territorial waters.

This agreement rectifies, at least to some extent, the past Benigno Aquino III regime's loss of Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island to the Chinese) in 2012.

The agreement is also a template for peace in the disputed islands and reefs in the Spratlys archipelago. It shows how stupid and leading-nowhere is the incumbent administration's belligerent "what-is-ours-is-ours" policy toward China. Vietnam informally has had a similar agreement for years.

The de facto agreement puts aside the issue of what country legitimately controls a particular feature in the Spratlys but allows fishermen from a claimant country to fish within the other claimant nation's exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

Full article here: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
 
Tanong ko lang sa mga pinoy. Di lang tayo ang may territory na inangkin ng china.

Kung sa tingin nyu regardless totoo o hindi ang sinasabe ng china regarding sa agreement kay tatay digs may kakayahan ba pinas to stop china?

Kahit pa panahon ni panot kinalaban natin yung china nothing changes mag bibuild parin yan sila ng mga islands lol.
 
THE Chinese Embassy the other day confirmed that the People's Republic of China and former president Rodrigo Duterte agreed on a "temporary special arrangement" to allow small-scale fishing around the disputed Spratly Islands, but restricted access for military, coast guard and other official planes and ships to the 12-nautical-mile limit of its occupied island's territorial waters.
so yung new model agreement means the gentleman agreement itself?
Tanong ko lang sa mga pinoy. Di lang tayo ang may territory na inangkin ng china.

Kung sa tingin nyu regardless totoo o hindi ang sinasabe ng china regarding sa agreement kay tatay digs may kakayahan ba pinas to stop china?

Kahit pa panahon ni panot kinalaban natin yung china nothing changes mag bibuild parin yan sila ng mga islands lol.
EEZ does not define the ownership of any maritime features (islands, rocks and low-tide elevations) within the EEZ.
 
Last edited:
EEZ does not define the ownership of any maritime features (islands, rocks and low-tide elevations) within the EEZ.
tama naman walang may ari ng eez pero ang may jurisdiction jan eh dapat pinas.

Pero marami rami din na country nag cli-claim di lang china haha anyways regardless kung totoo man o hindi ang agreement wala paring sense na pagdebatihan 👌
 
tama naman walang may ari ng eez pero ang may jurisdiction jan eh dapat pinas.

Pero marami rami din na country nag cli-claim di lang china haha anyways regardless kung totoo man o hindi ang agreement wala paring sense na pagdebatihan 👌
no one owns the region, it remains as an international territory kaya coordination and cooperation ang kailangan between the overlapping EEZs
 
Tanong ko lang sa mga pinoy. Di lang tayo ang may territory na inangkin ng china.

Kung sa tingin nyu regardless totoo o hindi ang sinasabe ng china regarding sa agreement kay tatay digs may kakayahan ba pinas to stop china?

Kahit pa panahon ni panot kinalaban natin yung china nothing changes mag bibuild parin yan sila ng mga islands lol.
Obvious na mismo yung sagot. Both countries are claimants and it's getting more complicated sa ginagawa pa lalo ng admin ngayon. Sa akin lang. Di ba masyadong selective naman like China lang yung kaaway natin jan. How about the other parties like Vietnam kung saan mas madami pa silang naipatayo na infra sa mga sinasabing isla. Taiwan, Malaysia and etc. Dahil ba hindi ngbomba eh okay na??Akala ko ba atin ang WPS
 
Obvious na mismo yung sagot. Both countries are claimants and it's getting more complicated sa ginagawa pa lalo ng admin ngayon. Sa akin lang. Di ba masyadong selective naman like China lang yung kaaway natin jan. How about the other parties like Vietnam kung saan mas madami pa silang naipatayo na infra sa mga sinasabing isla. Taiwan, Malaysia and etc. Dahil ba hindi ngbomba eh okay na??Akala ko ba atin ang WPS
we are losing already banana exports to Vietnam, they increased trade activities with China habang tayo parang bangag na nakikipag argue sa hindi naman atin at saka we're about to fight a losing war, walang kakwenta kwenta, Vietnam now is the top exporter of banana to China, tayo yan in the past kaya lang bangag kasi eh
 
we are losing already banana exports to Vietnam, they increased trade activities with China habang tayo parang bangag na nakikipag argue sa hindi naman atin at saka we're about to fight a losing war, walang kakwenta kwenta, Vietnam now is the top exporter of banana to China, tayo yan in the past kaya lang bangag kasi eh
Sad. Yung tourism din natin pakunti ng pakunti yung mga dayuhan pumupunta satin ,same din sa mga investors na mas pinili pa yung karatig bansa kaysa satin.
 
Tamang react lang ako mga nangyayari. Takte dami ko hindi alam, ang lala na pala ng mga issue ntn.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top