- Joined
- Aug 30, 2020
- Posts
- 15,536
- Solutions
- 47
- Reaction
- 8,909
- Points
- 4,286
Were christians to prove god(S), it still wouldn’t necessarily make their morality ‘objective’...
Here we have the so-called éùthyphro dilemma.
Is it good and just because God wills it or God wills it because it is good and just?
Criticism on "God wills it because it is good and just"
1. If there are moral standards independent of God's will, then there is something over which God is not sovereign.
2. These moral standards would limit God's power: not even God could oppose them by commanding what is evil and thereby making it good.
3. Moreover, these moral standards would limit God's freedom of will: God could not command anything opposed to them, and perhaps would have no choice but to command in accordance with them.
4. If there are moral standards independent of God, then morality would retain its authority even if God did not exist.
Criticism on "It is good and just because God wills it"
1. If there is no moral standard other than God's will, then God's commands are arbitrary (i.e., based on pure whimsy or caprice).
2. This arbitrariness would also jeopardize God's status as a wise and rational being, one who always acts on good reasons.
3. This arbitrariness would also mean that anything could become good, and anything could become bad, merely upon God's command.
4. If all morality is a matter of God's will, then if God does not exist, there is no morality.
Source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
God's morality is still debatable until now hehe
Here we have the so-called éùthyphro dilemma.
Is it good and just because God wills it or God wills it because it is good and just?
Criticism on "God wills it because it is good and just"
1. If there are moral standards independent of God's will, then there is something over which God is not sovereign.
2. These moral standards would limit God's power: not even God could oppose them by commanding what is evil and thereby making it good.
3. Moreover, these moral standards would limit God's freedom of will: God could not command anything opposed to them, and perhaps would have no choice but to command in accordance with them.
4. If there are moral standards independent of God, then morality would retain its authority even if God did not exist.
Criticism on "It is good and just because God wills it"
1. If there is no moral standard other than God's will, then God's commands are arbitrary (i.e., based on pure whimsy or caprice).
2. This arbitrariness would also jeopardize God's status as a wise and rational being, one who always acts on good reasons.
3. This arbitrariness would also mean that anything could become good, and anything could become bad, merely upon God's command.
4. If all morality is a matter of God's will, then if God does not exist, there is no morality.
Source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
God's morality is still debatable until now hehe
Last edited: