Atheist ako. Atheist din ba kayo?

[lystar]

atheist atheist kapang nalalamn nakiki uso ka lang naman .

 

[jayendecastro]

atheist atheist kapang nalalamn nakiki uso ka lang naman .

Kelan po sya nauso??

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

Believing despite not knowing is a fairly normal and logical reasoning… pd ka nman maniwala sa isang bagay even if u dont know or di ka sure about it…

oo nga. Mas common na state ng isip ng tao ung believing without knowing.

Halimbawa, iniwan mo ung susi mo sa usual place. Ginawa mo ung activities mo sa buong maghapon. Nung iniisip mo kung nasaan ung susi mo, it is automatic to believe na andoon sya kung saan mo iniwan. Despite sa posibility na meron ibang tao dadampot nun para lang ilipat for some reason, which is non-zero possibility.

In general, belief without knowing is the state of mind when we are on "autopilot" doing routine, usual, or non-engaging tasks.

 

[intoi]

Hindi ako atis tao ako
View attachment 2494224

prutas

 

[jayendecastro]

oo nga. Mas common na state ng isip ng tao ung believing without knowing.

Halimbawa, iniwan mo ung susi mo sa usual place. Ginawa mo ung activities mo sa buong maghapon. Nung iniisip mo kung nasaan ung susi mo, it is automatic to believe na andoon sya kung saan mo iniwan. Despite sa posibility na meron ibang tao dadampot nun para lang ilipat for some reason, which is non-zero possibility.

In general, belief without knowing is the state of mind when we are on "autopilot" doing routine, usual, or non-engaging tasks.

Yup.. like sa car din.. kung ung car na gamit ko araw araw eh laging nagiistart at umaandar ng ayos, its rational for me to believe that each time na gagamitin ko sya iistart sya at aandar…

To add more lang… even if u know something so well or believe in it so much does not mean na u will always be right about that thing..

Like sa susi na gaya ng mrs ko na paminsan minsan kung san san inilalagay.. hahahaha

Or kung ung car di ko alam meron na palang problema, etc

 

[chucks3]

Bago po ako isinilang sa mundo. Nakita ko na sI God. Ako ay nakaluhod at nakayuko sa kanya. Ako ay napaisip bakit ako nakayuko at bigla ako tumingin sa harap at nakita ko ang sobrang liwanag. Liwanag na pumasok sa puso ko at bigla akong umiyak dahil sa pagmamahal na nararamdaman. Pagkatapos ng lahat ay biglang dumilim at hndi ko na alam ang pangyayari. Totoo po ito ts mamatay man ako.

 

[flaw]

endless mga topic nyo mapa atheist at mga believer puro mga nonesense mga believe nyo mabuhay nalang kayo hangang kaya nyo mag ipon ng pera mag megosyo.. dahil in the end pag magka sakit na tayo pera padin ang gumagalaw kahit patay kana pag peperahan ka padin .... getsss nyo

Bago po ako isinilang sa mundo. Nakita ko na sI God. Ako ay nakaluhod at nakayuko sa kanya. Ako ay napaisip bakit ako nakayuko at bigla ako tumingin sa harap at nakita ko ang sobrang liwanag. Liwanag na pumasok sa puso ko at bigla akong umiyak dahil sa pagmamahal na nararamdaman. Pagkatapos ng lahat ay biglang dumilim at hndi ko na alam ang pangyayari. Totoo po ito ts mamatay man ako.

your so funny.... tindi ng imagination mo hahaha

 

[Mon De]

I dont believe there is called GOD, that makes me Atheist cguro .

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

To add more lang… even if u know something so well or believe in it so much does not mean na u will always be right about that thing..

Oo. Jan din nmn sa mga scenario na yan ang time when we question our belief. Thats the only time we look for "proof" and "evidence" and really look deeply.

But most of the time nag-ooperate tayo with beliefs and assumptions.

We assume na walang aagaw sa jowa natin, we assume na walang bigla nlng sasaksak satin sa kanto, we assume na mabuting tao nakakasalamuha natin. We assume that the world is such a good and safe place; unless proven otherwise.

 

[Napaj nI edaM]

You can only believe in something you don't know, If you already know about it then it is not believing but a Fact!

 

[plhbg1]

And that statement eh scientific din in a way kasi di nman yan faith-based belief lang sa panahon…may basehan for us to believe kung ano ang magiging weather kinabukasan…

the PAG-ASA weather forecast is not just about what they believe, kasi:

Extremely strong evidence is something that only comes by after the joint work of dozens of specialists with several years of training each, to be confirmed and reproduced by hundreds of others around the globe for some years after discovery. It’s not something a single person can observe by themselves, no matter how it's convincing to that single person.

kaya ala talagang belief sa science because di lang ganoon kadali mag conclude sa science, di lang pa-simple na sabihing i believe it will rain, but belief is used on anything not scientific, it's like saying you have a feeling that it will rain and you trust that feeling resulting in hoping it will rain

kaya yung situation na binigay ko, doon lang talaga tayo magka agree where believing always goes with not knowing and knowing always goes with not believing

 

[_kiko0013]

hadessssss

 

[Madin08]

What constitute "life"?
Pag ang artificial intelligence ba naperfect, will you consider it as "life"?

There will come a time na magiging issue ang human rights ng ai.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

iba kasi yung ai for me kahit na ma perfect pa yun it still a machine and it will fuction the way you want it to via programs. I cannot think of comparing organic and living things to machine.

so papaano natin masasabing magkaiba if same sila palagi (know=believe and don't know=don't believe) unless meron talaga sa actual na they know there is no god but they don't believe in it or they don't know if there is god but they believe there's one

if palaging i don't know plus i don't believe wala talaga akong makitang kaibahan diyan

science already has information about the origin of life, we have the abiogenesis theory which describes life as the result of spontaneous chemical reactions involving carbon, water and photons (light)

science has no information about souls so it's still unknown to us agnostics

you are not required to give answers to unknowns so let the unknowns stay as unknowns at no need na mag imbento ng kung anu-anung mga sagot tulad ng coincidence at creation

i've read that life came daw sa chemical reaction rna dna protein mga building blocks of life but still that is not enough the human body is too perfect na dahil lang sa chemichal reaction ang lahat? the animals the plants all from chemical reaction which are not making sense. sana ang ilong nasa likod ang bibig nasa noo but all are design perfectly like there is someone designed things that way. Di ba if you would think pwedi naman ang ilong nasa baba ang bata nasa noo mabubuhay parin naman ang tao non. baka sabihin sa evolution so there still posibilities na mabago pa ang design sa tao

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

iba kasi yung ai for me kahit na ma perfect pa yun it still a machine and it will fuction the way you want it to via programs. I cannot think of comparing organic and living things to machine.

What is so special about an organic conciousness compared to AI? We are also just "programmed" by our parents, teachers and the environment (including religion).

 

[plhbg1]

i've read that life came daw sa chemical reaction rna dna protein mga building blocks of life but still that is not enough the human body is too perfect na dahil lang sa chemichal reaction ang lahat? the animals the plants all from chemical reaction which are not making sense. sana ang ilong nasa likod ang bibig nasa noo but all are design perfectly like there is someone designed things that way. Di ba if you would think pwedi naman ang ilong nasa baba ang bata nasa noo mabubuhay parin naman ang tao non. baka sabihin sa evolution so there still posibilities na mabago pa ang design sa tao

naalala ko tuloy yung tanong: why does my pe̾nis fits perfectly into my hand? sounds like evidence of intelligent designer hehe

anyways, you are just assuming that life started with human form kaya na-amazed ka kasi tinuruan tayo ng simbahan na rekta human tayo, but if you look into science the first forms of life isn't good looking or perfect, that is why evolution is very important as stronger variants of life were produced and that includes us, life has evolve to a more intelligent variants, kaya drop that idea of rekta human si life

Atheist pero nasa Birth certificate roman catholic,

ala ata religion sa birth certificate boss, religion ng parents siguro na pumirma doon ang ibig mong sabihin

 

[Madin08]

What is so special about an organic conciousness compared to AI? We are also just "programmed" by our parents, teachers and the environment (including religion).

hindi pala special ang organic consciousness what if your parents was replace with this ai do you agree that they are still your parents? we are program right but still we choose what to believe in any case we can either beilive them or to not to follow them kaya nga my mga nagiging sutil eh,

naalala ko tuloy yung tanong: why does my pe̾nis fits perfectly into my hand? sounds like evidence of intelligent designer hehe

anyways, you are just assuming that life started with human form kaya na-amazed ka kasi tinuruan tayo ng simbahan na rekta human tayo, but if you look into science the first forms of life isn't good looking or perfect, that is why evolution is very important as stronger variants of life were produced and that includes us, life has evolve to a more intelligent variants, kaya drop that idea of rekta human si life

ala ata religion sa birth certificate boss, religion ng parents siguro na pumirma doon ang ibig mong sabihin

hehe , di nga pero hindi lang human madami organisms yun sa evolution it starts from a scratch e di ga di sana di lang human ang nasa taas to mention na billion na ang earth. parang na preserve ang tao

 

[plhbg1]

hehe , di nga pero hindi lang human madami organisms yun sa evolution it starts from a scratch e di ga di sana di lang human ang nasa taas to mention na billion na ang earth. parang na preserve ang tao

`so yung tanong mo is bakit dominant ang human species?

 

[Madin08]

`so yung tanong mo is bakit dominant ang human species?

pwedi pwedi

 

[jayendecastro]

the PAG-ASA weather forecast is not just about what they believe, kasi:

Extremely strong evidence is something that only comes by after the joint work of dozens of specialists with several years of training each, to be confirmed and reproduced by hundreds of others around the globe for some years after discovery. It’s not something a single person can observe by themselves, no matter how it's convincing to that single person.

kaya ala talagang belief sa science because di lang ganoon kadali mag conclude sa science, di lang pa-simple na sabihing i believe it will rain, but belief is used on anything not scientific, it's like saying you have a feeling that it will rain and you trust that feeling resulting in hoping it will rain

kaya yung situation na binigay ko, doon lang talaga tayo magka agree where believing always goes with not knowing and knowing always goes with not believing

My belief that it will rain tomorrow..MINE ang sinasabi ko na pding maging scientific like i said kasi may basehan.. PAG-ASA is a basehan, among others.. walang question sa process ng pagfoforecast na PAG-ASA..

Even an agency like them nga minsan nangyayari na may forecast sila na slightly off.. like ung time or duration ng ulan.. by then tska lang malalaman kung accurate ung belief na na form ng isang individual based sa information na nakuha nya from agencies like PAG-ASA….

Pdng maging mali pdng maging tama.. regardless of whether u believe it or know it..

 

[plhbg1]

pwedi pwedi

iyon naman talaga ang evolution, strongest species always dominate, in fact human species are strong enough to go out from nature and establish an environment set by them and not by nature, since evolution operates in natural selection then we could be dominating for long time because we practice artificial selection heavily (we modify nature instead of nature dictating the next mutation)

My belief that it will rain tomorrow..MINE ang sinasabi ko na pding maging scientific like i said kasi may basehan.. PAG-ASA is a basehan, among others.. walang question sa process ng pagfoforecast na PAG-ASA..

dito kasi if meron scientific basis before declaring what you [believe] it means you only have 1 choice and that is to follow that basis, i am not classifying this situation as belief

Even an agency like them nga minsan nangyayari na may forecast sila na slightly off.. like ung time or duration ng ulan.. by then tska lang malalaman kung accurate ung belief na na form ng isang individual based sa information na nakuha nya from agencies like PAG-ASA….

dito naman it looks like you declared your belief and test it with PAG-ASA's data so meron 2 options dito either match or mismatch, about naman sa accuracy ni PAG-ASA, it is the most accurate since there is no truth in science

Pdng maging mali pdng maging tama.. regardless of whether u believe it or know it..

tomorrow's weather cannot be known or is unknown as of the moment and that's the reason why pwedeng maging mali or tama, we can make belief naman on it but still subject to being mali or tama