Isang dahilan kung bkit hindi dapat maniwala sa pagpapahirap sa apoy ng impiyerno

[Cerebellum]

You're totally wrong, not all glitch can fix itself because most them needs to ρá†ch just to fix...

basta ang alam kong glitch, yung bida si Ichigo ...

Bleach pala yon, hindi glitch .. sorry

 

[plhbg1]

they interpret it literally or figuratively,

really, give me one figurative in science

does it mean na hindi na nila need mag-interpret, since they already collected the data naman na?

outputs tinutukoy ko, hindi yung process pa lang of proving something, finish product tayo kasi bible is a finish product

lalo na, nalaman ko din dito na ikaw lang nag-aanalyze ng Bible sa pagbabasa mo ,,

eto kasama na kita sa pag interpret ba't ganun pa din nakikita ko hehe

You're totally wrong, not all glitch can fix itself because most them needs to ρá†ch just to fix...

ayun agree ba kayo pipz na same lang ang glitch at bug?

 

[Cerebellum]

outputs tinutukoy ko, hindi yung process pa lang of proving something, finish product tayo kasi bible is a finish product

ano ba yung outputs paps? medyo nalilito ko eh hehehe lumalalim na yung pagkakasawsaw ko sa usap ninyo .. pati yung gabi, lumalalim na din eh hahaha

anong difference ng outputs dun sa finish product?

 

[plhbg1]

ano ba yung outputs paps? medyo nalilito ko eh hehehe lumalalim na yung pagkakasawsaw ko sa usap ninyo .. pati yung gabi, lumalalim na din eh hahaha

anu ba finish products ng scientific method? laws at theories ata iyon boss

 

[Cerebellum]

anu ba finish products ng scientific method? laws at theories ata iyon boss

di mo rin sure? di ko din sure eh hehehe ano po ba?

 

[plhbg1]

di mo rin sure? di ko din sure eh hehehe ano po ba?

ahaha ok remove ko yung "ata"

 

[Cerebellum]

ahaha ok remove ko yung "ata"

okay, so yung laws and theories ba ay hindi puwedeng i-interpret as figurative, most of them ba ay literal na inuunawa?

 

[plhbg1]

okay, so yung laws and theories ba ay hindi puwedeng i-interpret as figurative, most of them ba ay literal na inuunawa?

kaya nga educate mo ako about figurative science, give examples kasi mahirap ako maka intindi

 

[Cerebellum]

kaya nga educate mo ako about figurative science, give examples kasi mahirap ako maka intindi

un na nga po yung example ko kanina paps, ung sa psychology, at linguistics ..

mahirap ako maka intindi

same din naman paps, ganun din ako hehehe

 

[plhbg1]

un na nga po yung example ko kanina paps, ung sa psychology, at linguistics ..
same din naman paps, ganun din ako hehehe

so meron ba sa language na kunwari tagalog tapos english pala? hehe

 

[Cerebellum]

so meron ba sa language na kunwari tagalog tapos english pala? hehe

no .. but if someone says to you, nadurog ang puso niya nang iwan siya ng minamahal niya .. do you take it as literal na nadurog ang puso niya?

or if someone says, sana dalawa ang puso ko .. does it mean, na gusto niyang maging dalawa literally yung puso niya?

magiging kasalanan ba ng linguistics kung sa field na yan eh nahahati ang isipan ng reader kasi there are times na you need to interpret words and phrases figuratively?

 

[plhbg1]

no .. but if someone says to you, nadurog ang puso niya nang iwan siya ng minamahal niya .. do you take it as literal na nadurog ang puso niya?

idioms nga, proven naman ang idioms to contain figurative meaning, ginagamitan ba ng idioms ang linguistics? or idioms was discovered by linguistics

 

[Cerebellum]

idioms was discovered by linguistics

idioms was part/under of linguistics .. dahil ang linguistics is the study of human speech including the units, nature, structure, and modification of language. (thanks Merriam)

magiging kasalanan ba ng linguistics kung sa field na yan eh nahahati ang isipan ng reader kasi there are times na you need to interpret words and phrases figuratively?

puwede mo rin sagutin to paps .. hehehe

 

[plhbg1]

idioms was part of linguistics .. dahil ang linguistics is the study of human speech including the units, nature, structure, and modification of language. (thanks Merriam)

nope, it is a finish product of linguistics, na-discover nila na meron certain phrases which contain figurative meaning, it was found to be an attribute of languages, di yun part ng linguistics, linguistics can exist without idioms being discovered

puwede mo rin sagutin to paps .. hehehe

hindi nga linguistics kundi idioms, idioms is not linguistics, linguistics is the science that discovered idioms and idioms is the attribute of languages discovered by linguistics, linguistics is not idioms and idioms is not linguistics

 

[Cerebellum]

linguistics is not idioms and idioms is not linguistics

wala naman po akong sinabing ganun .. but yung linguistic, eh napag-aaralan niya kahit yung ganyang mga bagay ..

 

[plhbg1]

wala naman po akong sinabing ganun .. but yung linguistic, eh napag-aaralan niya kahit yung ganyang mga bagay ..

yes, nung sinabi ni linguistics that idioms exists hindi figurative iyon kundi literal talaga na merong idioms

 

[Cerebellum]

literal talaga na merong idioms

ni-konek mo lang yung literal na word sa idioms eh para masabing literal, but, yes, it is literally a part of linguistics .. but the idioms itself contains figurative words .. tama ba ako o mali?

 

[plhbg1]

ni-konek mo lang yung literal na word sa idioms eh para masabing literal, but, yes, it is literally a part of linguistics .. but the idioms itself contains figurative words .. tama ba ako o mali?

yes but idioms is not science, it is the linguistics that is science which discovered idioms, nag example ka ng idioms as finish product, at ang findings ng linguistics ay "idioms exist as attribute of languages", asan ba figurative diyan, just like any other scientific theory walang figurative, because they are already the interpretation of observations

 

[Cerebellum]

yes but idioms is not science, it is the linguistics that is science which discovered idioms, nag example ka ng idioms as finish product, at ang findings ng linguistics ay "idioms exist as attribute of languages", asan ba figurative diyan, just like any other scientific theory walang figurative, because they are already the interpretation of observations

reply ako bukas hahah antok na ko eh

 

[plhbg1]

reply ako bukas hahah antok na ko eh

hehe scientific theories/laws are already the interpretation of something, that something is figured out already, tapos na ang pagka figurative kasi na figured out na nga e, naging theory na

ginawa mong example ang discovery ng figurative speech to confuse, it is science that discovered figurative speech, at pag sinabi there is figurative speech literal talaga na meron iyon