I just have a suggestion: that staff members remain apolitical and unbiased when it comes to enforcing the rules. If ever they participate in debates, they should remain fair and not let personal beliefs blind them in enforcing the rules. I am not referring to all staff members, only to those who fall under one or more of the aforementioned description.
Case on point, this comment: https://phcorner.net/threads/810394/page-10#post-14309371
It is stated in the rules: Posts containing racism, foul words, bullying, rudeness, discriminating or threatening other members are not allowed. This comment clearly violates this rule.
On that same thread, there was a member who was banned because his/her beliefs were different. Whereas no sanctions where given against the member who kept calling someone 'engot'. Isn't it unfair to impose rules and yet, break the rules you have vowed to uphold? Shouldn't rules be enforced on all, regardless of their political stance?
Another example: https://phcorner.net/threads/820820/#post-14481368
A moderator participated in a political debate but closed the thread because the TS did not provide reliable sources. While this is understandable, shouldn't there be a rule that requires a user to post references? Because there is none. Furthermore, there are other threads with no reliable sources so why were they not closed as well? Like this one: https://phcorner.net/threads/806764/ or this one https://phcorner.net/threads/811096 to name a few. Or are references only required from the opposition and only the pro-administration posts are used as a basis for truth? I hope this gets clarified.
I hope you take this as both a suggestion and as a constructive criticism for PHC. I hope that you will look into this as well. Thank you.
Case on point, this comment: https://phcorner.net/threads/810394/page-10#post-14309371
It is stated in the rules: Posts containing racism, foul words, bullying, rudeness, discriminating or threatening other members are not allowed. This comment clearly violates this rule.
On that same thread, there was a member who was banned because his/her beliefs were different. Whereas no sanctions where given against the member who kept calling someone 'engot'. Isn't it unfair to impose rules and yet, break the rules you have vowed to uphold? Shouldn't rules be enforced on all, regardless of their political stance?
Another example: https://phcorner.net/threads/820820/#post-14481368
A moderator participated in a political debate but closed the thread because the TS did not provide reliable sources. While this is understandable, shouldn't there be a rule that requires a user to post references? Because there is none. Furthermore, there are other threads with no reliable sources so why were they not closed as well? Like this one: https://phcorner.net/threads/806764/ or this one https://phcorner.net/threads/811096 to name a few. Or are references only required from the opposition and only the pro-administration posts are used as a basis for truth? I hope this gets clarified.
I hope you take this as both a suggestion and as a constructive criticism for PHC. I hope that you will look into this as well. Thank you.
Attachments
-
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Last edited: