Closed Bakit nga ba maraming bansa ang takot sa USA?

Bakit nga ba maraming bansa ang takot sa USA?

Matatag na Ekonomiya:
Maaaring isa sa mga dahilan ay ang malakas nitong ekonomiya at hindi dahil sa militarisasyon nito. Kapag merong bansa na hindi sumunod sa gusto ng US ay may kaakibat agad na sanctions pang ekonomiya ang kakaharapin nito tulad ng Iran, North Korea atbp. Sanction na magbabawal nitong makipagkalakal sa ibang bansa. Kapag merong bansa na makipagkalakal sa isang bansang may sanction; ay sya ring kakaharapin nito. Maaaring ang bansang ito ay dadanasin ang pagtaas ng presyo ng mga bilihin na syang magpapahirap sa mga nasasakupan nito kung hindi agad ito nari-resolve.
Bakit sila napipilitang sumunod sa USA? Masyadong malaki ang ekonomiya ng USA. Sa US halos iniexport ng mga bansa ang kanilang mga produkto ng malakihan, at masyadong malaki ang mawawala sa isang bansa kapag hindi na aangkat ang US sa kanila ng ibat ibang produkto dahil lamang sa hindi pagsunod sa gusto nito.
Meron bang bansa ang hindi natakot sa USA? Meron, China mismo. Pinakamalaking market sa buong mundo dahil sa mataas nitong populasyon. Tanging China lang ang may kakayahan na makipagharapan sa USA sa ngayon. Gaya ng USA, sa China din napupunta ang maraming produkto ng ibat ibang mga bansa. At China rin ang patuloy na nakikipagkalakal sa mga bansang may sanction. Tanging USA lang naman ang mahilig mag sanction. nambubully sa ibang malilit na bansa gamit ang lakas ng ekonomiya. kung iisipin ay pweding isa itong modern DICTATOR.

 

[fabbriche]

Agree sana...pero. What does the word balance means? The counterreaction of two or more forces. To balance, to counter something. You can't have a balance if there is a monopoly.


"China is nothing without the US..." Did you even ask how the US and Western countries without the manufacturing capabilities of china? Do you think they "invested" in china simply because they want to improve/develop china? No, they "invest" simply because that is the most PROFITABLE for them. Kung talagang they want to look after their citizenry, why did they even move the production to china? Why didn't they employ their locals. Because the mantra of capitalism is profit first before the welfare of your citizenry or anything else.

So don't even think that by moving their production to china they are making any favor to china or to their country. They are only making favor to themselves.

A single superpower can give global leadership on important international concerns. If there is to be only one superpower, it should be democratic since democracy is the most desirable system of government. There will be balance of power since rogue states can be put in check. There would be no power balance when two antithetical superpowers emerged. There would be world war.

Massive workforce and cheap labor is the reason for Western outsourcing to China. Western countries are highly developed economies which are exactly post-industrial economies. These countries' wealth are mostly generated by their service sector not by their industrial sector anymore. Developing countries, on the contrary, are industrial/agricultural-oriented. It's a case of white collar vs. blue collar. Most people from developed nations like the US are trained for and prefer high-paying white collar jobs. People from developing countries like China are skilled for more arduous blue collar jobs like in manufacturing and farming.

China is replaceable. US supply chains can easily be moved to dozens of US allies should the US decide to. So yes, the US is doing China favor for choosing China for outsourcing its manufacturing industry.

 

[homer_simpson]

A single superpower can give global leadership on important international concerns. If there is to be only one superpower, it should be democratic since democracy is the most desirable system of government. There will be balance of power since rogue states can be put in check. There would be no power balance when two antithetical superpowers emerged. There would be world war.

The US, being the solo superpower do you see any "democratic leadership" happening these days? The only concern they have, is those of whoever runs the US govt, ie bankers, corporations etc. Do you honestly think that they would give a damn to what's going on on 3rd world countries, lest their own citizens?

So you are happy that the US is throwing governments right, left and center?

...
Massive workforce and cheap labor is the reason for Western outsourcing to China. Western countries are highly developed economies which are exactly post-industrial economies. These countries' wealth are mostly generated by their service sector not by their industrial sector anymore. Developing countries, on the contrary, are industrial/agricultural-oriented. It's a case of white collar vs. blue collar. Most people from developed nations like the US are trained for and prefer high-paying white collar jobs. People from developing countries like China are skilled for more arduous blue collar jobs like in manufacturing and farming.

China is replaceable. US supply chains can easily be moved to dozens of US allies should the US decide to. So yes, the US is doing China favor for choosing China for outsourcing its manufacturing industry.

What exactly do you mean by "service sector and not by their industrial sector"?

Cheap labor is exactly what the corporations want, thus more profits. Don't you think?

China is replaceable? I'm not seeing any US corporations dumping china? Do you?

 

[QOU HIT MEI NGAO]

Talking about "International Police"
Hindi lang USA ang considered as International Police kundi lima yan sila. At tanging si USA lang ang kakaiba sa kanilang lima. Ang limang bansang ito ang mga founder ng UN. Sila ang naging founder ng UN dahil sila ang nanalo sa WW2. Ang mga bansang ito ay USA, CHINA, RUSSIA, FRANCE at UK. Ang limang bansang yan ay mga regular member ng UNSC. Lahat ng resolution or mga plano ng mga nagkakaisang bansa ay sila lang lima ang natatanging pwede mag approved sa mga ito.. Kapag may kasunduan at isa sa lima ang against nito ay automatic na mabi-veto ang mga ito.

Halimbawa:
Kapag napagkasunduan ng mga bansa na magpapadala ng mga sundalo doon sa Syria para mapigilan ang patuloy na pag ataki ng Turkey sa Kurdistan, ang final na desisyon nito ay nasa limang bansa. Kung halimbawa papayag ang CHINA, USA, UK at FRANCE tapos yung si RUSSIA ay hindi papayag ay automatic na mabi-VETO ito at walang kahit isang sundalo ang papayagan na mapapadala. Magiging approved lang ito kung ang limang bansa ay nagkasundo sa isang desisyon na pagpayag. Ganun ang kapangyarihan ng lima..

 

[QOU HIT MEI NGAO]

Para sa kaalaman. Lists of countries in terms of GDP.

Source: CIA World FactBook

 

[fabbriche]

The US, being the solo superpower do you see any "democratic leadership" happening these days? The only concern they have, is the concern of whoever runs the US govt, ie bankers, corporations etc. Do you honestly think that they would give a damn to what's going on on 3rd world countries, lest their own citizens?

So you are happy that the US is throwing governments right, left and center?



What exactly do you mean by "service sector and not by their industrial sector"?

Cheap labor is exactly what the corporations want, thus more profits. Don't you think?

China is replaceable? I'm not seeing any US corporations dumping china? Do you?

Except the US is not anymore overthrowing governments left and right. The only governments the US deposed in the 21st century are the authoritarian regimes of Iraq and Libya. In the past, many countries benefitted greatly from US intervention. The US saved South Korea from imminent communist takeover led by the powerful forces of North Korea, China and the Soviet Union. The US saved Japan from its own demons during WW2, as well as other Asian countries that Japan invaded and colonized. The miraculous transformation of South Korea and Japan into modern, democratic, peaceful, prosperous nations and economic powerhouses is a direct result of US military intervention, occupation and rehabilitation. Netherlands, Germany and pretty much every other western European country were freed from Nazi occupation and were even rebuilt by the US in order to prevent another world war from happening. Albania, the only Muslim country in the world that loves the US, were also saved by the US from disintegrating and being swallowed by its neighbors. The US also saved Kosovo from genocide initiated by Serbia. And of course, Israel. It would have long ceased to exist as a nation without US support. It was European imperialism that ****ed up the whole world. The spread of communism and fascism ****ed up the world even more and could have brought it to its end had the US not intervened. The US is God-sent to the world to free it from oppressive regimes and make it a better place. Only time it fails is when the modern political and economic changes it initiates are rejected by the locals as is the case in Islamic countries. The US is a superpower and as such will always behave as the world police whether you like it or not, and I prefer the US to be the world police rather than the likes of China and Russia.

Developed countries such as the US and Western European countries have economies centered around the service sector. The service sector produces professional services such managerial, entrepreneurship, healthcare, banking, IT services as opposed to manual labors such as those in factories, agriculture, fisheries and the like which dominate the economies of developing countries like China.

Developed countries = service economies = professional workers

Developing/undeveloped countries = industry/agricultural economies = labor workers

Have you not been keeping up with the latest world news? US companies have already prompted moving their production out of China as per Trump's directive and consequence of the ongoing US-China trade war. These large companies can easily replace who manufactures their goods. China's downfall is imminent.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[fabbriche]

Para sa kaalaman. Lists of countries in terms of GDP.
View attachment 710335

Source: CIA World FactBook

1.4 BILLION ang population ng China. 330 million lang ang sa US, mahigit na 4x na mas maliit. Mas mayaman ang US kesa China. Nasa top 10 xa by per capita income. Ang China wala pa sa top 70. At heavily reliant ang economy ng China sa mga US at Western companies. Kayang pabagsakin ng US ang China sa trade war lang. Mas kelangan ng China ang US kesa kelangan ng US ang China.

 

[QOU HIT MEI NGAO]

1.4 BILLION ang population ng China. 330 million lang ang sa US, mahigit na 4x na mas maliit. Mas mayaman ang US kesa China. Nasa top 10 xa by per capita income. Ang China wala pa sa top 70. At heavily reliant ang economy ng China sa mga US at Western companies. Kayang pabagsakin ng US ang China sa trade war lang. Mas kelangan ng China ang US kesa kelangan ng US ang China.

Pag sinabi kasi nating per capita income kailangan nating idivide ang total income buong taon ng isang bansa sa total population nito kaya mababa ang resulta ng China.

GDP(PPP)/Total population = Per capita income

23,120,000,000,000/1,400,000,000= 16,514

Yan ang dahilan kung bakit ika 106 ang China.

 

[fabbriche]

Pag sinabi kasi nating per capita income kailangan nating idivide ang total income buong taon ng isang bansa sa total population nito kaya mababa ang resulta ng China.

GDP(PPP)/Total population = Per capita income

Malaki ang ekonomiya ng China dahil malaki ang populasyon nya, pinakamalaki sa buong mundo, higit 4x na mas malaki kesa US, pero wala pa sa 1/4 ang difference ng GDP nilang dalawa. Mas mayaman at mas makapangyarihan ang US kesa China ng milya milya. Kayang kayang durugin ng US ang China mapa economic o military war. US ang may pinaka powerful military sa history ng mundo.

 

[QOU HIT MEI NGAO]

Malaki ang ekonomiya ng China dahil malaki ang populasyon nya, pinakamalaki sa buong mundo, higit 4x na mas malaki kesa US, pero wala pa sa 1/4 ang difference ng GDP nilang dalawa. Mas mayaman at mas makapangyarihan ang US kesa China ng milya milya. Kayang kayang durugin ng US ang China mapa economic o military war. US ang may pinaka powerful military sa history ng mundo.

Kailangan mo rin cguro mabasa ito:

The US military is no longer the primary force in Asia, and missiles from China's rapidly improving military could overwhelm its bases in hours, according to a new report.

The study by the United States Study Center, at the University of Sydney, in Australia, warned that America's defense strategy in the Indo-Pacific region "is in the throes of an unprecedented crisis" and could struggle to defend its allies against China.

That means Australia, Japan and other US partners need to build up and refocus their forces in the region, and consider increased cooperation with the US, to ensure their security, the study claimed.

Almost all US military installations in the Western Pacific, as well as those of its key partners and allies, "could be rendered useless by precision strikes in the opening hours of a conflict," according to the report.

Source:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[fabbriche]

Kailangan mo rin cguro mabasa ito:

The US military is no longer the primary force in Asia, and missiles from China's rapidly improving military could overwhelm its bases in hours, according to a new report.

The study by the United States Study Center, at the University of Sydney, in Australia, warned that America's defense strategy in the Indo-Pacific region "is in the throes of an unprecedented crisis" and could struggle to defend its allies against China.

That means Australia, Japan and other US partners need to build up and refocus their forces in the region, and consider increased cooperation with the US, to ensure their security, the study claimed.

Almost all US military installations in the Western Pacific, as well as those of its key partners and allies, "could be rendered useless by precision strikes in the opening hours of a conflict," according to the report.

Source:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Mas powerful ang military ng US kesa China, hindi lang nakabase ang buong pwersa nya sa Asia. Maraming military bases ang US sa iba't ibang bansa sa buong mundo. Ung pwersa ng US military na nasa Asia mas maliit kesa buong pwersa ng Chinese military.

 

[QOU HIT MEI NGAO]

Mas powerful ang military ng US kesa China, hindi lang nakabase ang buong pwersa nya sa Asia. Maraming military bases ang US sa iba't ibang bansa sa buong mundo. Ung pwersa ng US military na nasa Asia mas maliit kesa buong pwersa ng Chinese military.

Kailangan mo rin siguro mabasa ito na may pag-amin ang US:

The US is facing an emerging threat in the form of hypersonic weapons, leading to calls for the US to develop its own defensive and offensive hypersonic capabilities.

"China's hypersonic weapons development outpaces ours," Admiral Harry Harris, head of US Pacific Command, told Congress on Wednesday.

"We're falling behind," Harris said, echoing US Air Force General Paul Selva's recent comments that the US has "lost our technical advantage in hypersonics" to Beijing and Moscow, whose programs have accelerated forward at mach speed.

Source:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Mark120889]

May avengers kasi ts. Tingnan mo ung japan di nila masyado pinapansin kc baka ilabas si goku pati na rin si saitama.. Hehe.. Peace

 

[fabbriche]

Kailangan mo rin siguro mabasa ito na may pag-amin ang US:

View attachment 710386
The US is facing an emerging threat in the form of hypersonic weapons, leading to calls for the US to develop its own defensive and offensive hypersonic capabilities.

"China's hypersonic weapons development outpaces ours," Admiral Harry Harris, head of US Pacific Command, told Congress on Wednesday.

"We're falling behind," Harris said, echoing US Air Force General Paul Selva's recent comments that the US has "lost our technical advantage in hypersonics" to Beijing and Moscow, whose programs have accelerated forward at mach speed.

Source:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Currently in development pa lang yang hypersonic missiles ng China. Nagdedevelop na rin ang US ng kanila. Mas magaling ang US kesa China. Mas experienced at sumabak na sila sa mas maraming wars.

 

[QOU HIT MEI NGAO]

May avengers kasi ts. Tingnan mo ung japan di nila masyado pinapansin kc baka ilabas si goku pati na rin si saitama.. Hehe.. Peace

Pati rin si Godzilla baka ilabas.

 

[QOU HIT MEI NGAO]

Currently in development pa lang yang hypersonic missiles ng China. Nagdedevelop na rin ang US ng kanila. Mas magaling ang US kesa China. Mas experienced at sumabak na sila sa mas maraming wars.

Siguro kailangan mo rin malaman na hindi na yan under development dahil nasa kalsada na yan last Oct. 1, 2019..

Reports citing U.S. government sources have said China has carried out several tests of HGVs, including the DF-17, since 2014. The DF-17 is the first system of its type known to be operational in the world..

Source:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[fabbriche]

Siguro kailangan mo rin malaman na hindi na yan under development dahil nasa kalsada na yan last Oct. 1, 2019..
View attachment 710396
Reports citing U.S. government sources have said China has carried out several tests of HGVs, including the DF-17, since 2014. The DF-17 is the first system of its type known to be operational in the world..

Source:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Hindi pa natetest ang missiles na yan. Ibinibida lang yan ng China para mang intimidate. Kung totoong fully operational yang mga missiles na yan gagawing confidential yan ng China at susorpresahin na lang ang US sa war.

 

[homer_simpson]

May avengers kasi ts. Tingnan mo ung japan di nila masyado pinapansin kc baka ilabas si goku pati na rin si saitama.. Hehe.. Peace

Psst. Nakalimutan mo yung Gundams.

 

[homer_simpson]

Hindi pa natetest ang missiles na yan. Ibinibida lang yan ng China para mang intimidate. Kung totoong fully operational yang mga missiles na yan gagawing confidential yan ng China at susorpresahin na lang ang US sa war.

How you sow fear? You show your scary stuff. In this Nuclear Age, wala ng sorpre-sorpresa. Kung may nuke ka at new tech, ipagyabang mo to further deter your adversaries.

 

[homer_simpson]

Except the US is not anymore overthrowing governments left and right. The only governments the US deposed in the 21st century are the authoritarian regimes of Iraq and Libya. In the past, many countries benefitted greatly from US ...

You seemed to missed lots of countries who received US "freedom".

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

"In the past, many countries benefitted greatly from US". Seriously????? Like they created a huge mess in 'nam, been a major part of killings in 'raq, 'ghanistan? Used and left depleted uranium in Iraq, just like what they did in 'nam.

You sound like burying your head in the sand.

 

[QOU HIT MEI NGAO]

Hindi pa natetest ang missiles na yan. Ibinibida lang yan ng China para mang intimidate. Kung totoong fully operational yang mga missiles na yan gagawing confidential yan ng China at susorpresahin na lang ang US sa war.

Natural lang sa isang bansa na ipakita yung pwersa nya para hindi na sya mamaliitin or ibubully man ng ibang mga bansa gaya ng patuloy na pagdisplay ng USA sa kanyang pwersa para ipakita sa buong mundo kung gaano siya kalakas.

Matapos ma-display ang pwersa ng China ay biglang nanamihik ang USA.