"𝗞𝗨𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗡𝗔𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗞𝗔𝗪 𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗠𝗚𝗔 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗦, 𝗕𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗧 𝗪𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗡𝗔𝗞𝗨𝗟𝗢𝗡𝗚?"
1. There was no ANTI-PLUNDER LAW during the Marcos' case. (NO RETROACTIVE EFFECT - Hindi maaring hatulan ang mga Marcoses gamit ang 1991 ANTI-PLUNDER LAW)
2. In the 1955 Anti-Ill Gotten Wealth Act (Republic Act 1379) which was the basis of the Marcos case, there was no imprisonment penalty for public officials. The only penalty for such offense is forfeiting all ill-gotten assets which happened to the Marcos' case.(
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
)
3. The Marcoses have ill-gotten wealth. That is the legal truth. The Court has already ruled in several cases on this matter and such decisions are already final. You can disagree with it and are free to have your own opinion, but we need to respect the rulings of the Court.
4. The Swiss Foundation deposits ($658M) was considered ill-gotten wealth by the Supreme Court because the Marcoses failed to justify the lawful acquisition of these assets. (Korte Suprema: G.R. No. 152154 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan)
5. Nahatulan si Imelda Marcos ng Sandiganbayan noong 2018 na GUILTY OF 7 COUNTS OF GRAFT na may parusang 6 years each, or total of 42 years. Agad-agad siyang nagpiyansa kaya hindi na naituloy ang pagkakakulong sa kaniya. Mananatili siyang malaya hangga't hindi pa naaaksyunan ng Korte Suprema ang kaniyang appeal. Ito ay kalayaang mula sa mga karapatan niya sa ilalim ng demokrasya na pinasinayaan ni Pangulong Corazon Aquino. (
)
Sa ngayon, Forfeiture Case at awaiting finality (Imelda's) na lamang ang pinaglalabanan ng mga Marcoses at ng Gobyerno.
Tandaan: Hindi porket hindi nakulong, inosente na. Alamin. Aralin. Mag-isip!
Gustong gusto niyo kasi yata pinagnanakawan
"Basta solid BBM ako"