What's new

Closed Bakit nga ba maraming bansa ang takot sa USA?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bakit nga ba maraming bansa ang takot sa USA?

Matatag na Ekonomiya:
Maaaring isa sa mga dahilan ay ang malakas nitong ekonomiya at hindi dahil sa militarisasyon nito. Kapag merong bansa na hindi sumunod sa gusto ng US ay may kaakibat agad na sanctions pang ekonomiya ang kakaharapin nito tulad ng Iran, North Korea atbp. Sanction na magbabawal nitong makipagkalakal sa ibang bansa. Kapag merong bansa na makipagkalakal sa isang bansang may sanction; ay sya ring kakaharapin nito. Maaaring ang bansang ito ay dadanasin ang pagtaas ng presyo ng mga bilihin na syang magpapahirap sa mga nasasakupan nito kung hindi agad ito nari-resolve.
Bakit sila napipilitang sumunod sa USA? Masyadong malaki ang ekonomiya ng USA. Sa US halos iniexport ng mga bansa ang kanilang mga produkto ng malakihan, at masyadong malaki ang mawawala sa isang bansa kapag hindi na aangkat ang US sa kanila ng ibat ibang produkto dahil lamang sa hindi pagsunod sa gusto nito.
Meron bang bansa ang hindi natakot sa USA? Meron, China mismo. Pinakamalaking market sa buong mundo dahil sa mataas nitong populasyon. Tanging China lang ang may kakayahan na makipagharapan sa USA sa ngayon. Gaya ng USA, sa China din napupunta ang maraming produkto ng ibat ibang mga bansa. At China rin ang patuloy na nakikipagkalakal sa mga bansang may sanction. Tanging USA lang naman ang mahilig mag sanction. nambubully sa ibang malilit na bansa gamit ang lakas ng ekonomiya. kung iisipin ay pweding isa itong modern DICTATOR.

IMG_20191017_064638.jpg

IMG_20191017_062446.jpg

IMG_20191017_065104.jpg

IMG_20191017_065025.jpg
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Sana sunod na isalvage o pabagsakin ng mga Amerikano si Duterte gaya ng ginawa nila kina Gadaffi at Hussein. Bago matapos term ni Trump sana mapagbasak din nila ang China.
 
Sana sunod na isalvage o pabagsakin ng mga Amerikano si Duterte gaya ng ginawa nila kina Gadaffi at Hussein. Bago matapos term ni Trump sana mapagbasak din nila ang China.
Sa tingin ko malabo mangyari yun dahil kailangan ng US ang China sa kanilang economy. Dahil ang China ang pinakamalaking customer ng US lalo na soybeans. Kaya nagkabaliw-baliw na si Trump ngayon na magkaroon ng patas na kasunduan sa China gaya ng maramihang pagbili ng China sa produkto ng USA. Sinasabi kasi ng USA na hindi patas ang pag-angkat ng China sa produkto ng US dahil marami ang produktong binili ang USA sa China pero ang China ay kunti lang ang inangkat na produkto galing USA.. Ang resulta US-China Trade war. Tariff vs Tariff na maaring dahilan ng global crisis this coming 2020 kung hindi maresolve..
 
Last edited:
syempre sila din may ari ng isis realtalk
Dahil sa biglang pag tanggal ng tropang amerikano sa Turkey ngayun, inataki ng Turkey ang mga Kurdish na pangunahing nkikipaglaban dati sa ISIS. Na sinasabing maaari ring dahilan ng pagkabuhay ng ISIS kung magpatuloy ang opinsiba ng Turkish army.. Ang Kurdish ay kinikilalang rebelde sa bansang Turkey at kaalyado ng USA sa labanan vs ISIS.
 
Sana sunod na isalvage o pabagsakin ng mga Amerikano si Duterte gaya ng ginawa nila kina Gadaffi at Hussein. Bago matapos term ni Trump sana mapagbasak din nila ang China.
Then you are going to tip further the balance of power, ie monopoly of power. The usa is already the single most bully in the planet. The least people would like to witness is to see its grip getting uncontested.
 
Last edited:
Then you are going to tip further the balance of power, ie monopoly of bullying. The usa is already the single most bully in the planet. The least people would like to witness is to see its grip getting uncontested.
The US do not act like a bully. They act like a world police. It's the norm for global/super powers to place themselves as a world police and project their power to any corner on the planet, and I would much rather live in a world where a country like the US which prides itself as a beacon of democracy and human rights poses the biggest threat to other nations than someone that has no regard to human rights at all like China or Russia. The US is really only a threat to authoritarian states. China is an explicitly evil Orwellian commie empire that its growing global influence would be a threat to anyone if not curbed or, rather, completely destroyed.
 
The US do not act like a bully. They act like a world police. It's the norm for global/super powers to place themselves as a world police and project their power to any corner on the planet, and I would much rather live in a world where a country like the US which prides itself as a beacon of democracy and human rights poses the biggest threat to other nations than someone that has no regard to human rights at all like China or Russia. The US is really only a threat to authoritarian states. China is an explicitly evil Orwellian commie empire that its growing global influence would be a threat to anyone if not curbed or, rather, completely destroyed.
Right....the US being the beacon of democracy and human rights (except when it is not :) )and all those good shits. You seem to be succumbing to west-dominated media. All those countries that you mentioned have certain degrees of evilness. What separate them from US though is they are not pretentious to be the bearer of democracy, human rights, liberators of the oppressed.

I can't count on my 10 fingers how many countries destabilized by US.

... The US is really only a threat to authoritarian states. China is an explicitly evil Orwellian commie empire that its growing global influence would be a threat to anyone if not curbed or, rather, completely destroyed.
To put it more correctly, the US is only threat to a country who can not slap them back, ie libya, iraq, afghanistan etc. Look at HK, why do you think there ain't any US boots on the ground there? 'cause the equally-evil china can slap 'em back.
 
Last edited:
Right....the US being the beacon of democracy and human rights (except when it is not humans in US :) )and all those good shits. You seem to be succumbing to west-dominated media. All those countries that you mentioned have certain degrees of evilness. What separate them from US though is they are not pretentious to be the bearer of democracy, human rights, liberators of the oppressed.

I can't count on my 10 fingers how many countries destabilized by US.


To put it more correctly, the US is only threat to a country who can not slap them back, ie libya, iraq, afghanistan etc. Look at HK, why do you think there ain't any US boots on the ground there? 'cause the equally-evil china can slap 'em back.
I'm well aware of the US human rights violations on other nations. It's pretty much well-documented. But I'd very willingly much rather take it over China taking the place of the US as a superpower and Do you even know how China treats its minorities and how it subverts government resistance? I don't want to live in an alternate reality where China already gains that much power to project its political and military might on other nations.

The US can easily make China perish and it doesn't even need to wage a military war against it. Imposing tariffs on China is enough to cripple its economy which will diminish China's political and economic influence on the global stage. China got rich for ONLY one reason: American companies outsourced their production on China and made it the manufacturing capital of the world. The US basically made China what it is today and what it gave it can easily take back which is what Trump is doing currently.

China's economy is very vulnerable as it's heavily reliant on Western companies and its quickly aging population will eventually be a big burden on its labor force. China is effed either way.
 
I'm well aware of the US human rights violations on other nations. It's pretty much well-documented. But I'd very willingly much rather take it over China taking the place of the US as a superpower and Do you even know how China treats its minorities and how it subverts government resistance? I don't want to live in an alternate reality where China already gains that much power to project its political and military might on other nations.

The US can easily make China perish and it doesn't even need to wage a military war against it. Imposing tariffs on China is enough to cripple its economy which will diminish China's political and economic influence on the global stage. China got rich for ONLY one reason: American companies outsourced their production on China and made it the manufacturing capital of the world. The US basically made China what it is today and what it gave it can easily take back which is what Trump is doing currently.

China's economy is very vulnerable as it's heavily reliant on Western companies and its quickly aging population will eventually be a big burden on its labor force. China is effed either way.

...The US can easily make China perish and it doesn't even need to wage a military war against it...
You seem to be completely underestimating china... No superpower would even contemplate of waging war against other, hence the proxy wars these days.

You a big Trump fan? I'm not a china fan, but how did the US become what they are now? By exploiting weak countries, by manipulating and sabotaging world's economy. By the way, in the last 100 years how many countries did china invade vs the US' under the false pretense of "freedom"?

I don't want to live in an alternate reality where a single superpower has a grip on the entire glob.
 
Last edited:
makapangyarihan kasi US eh. Pero ngayon ngsisimula na bumangon ang Russia at China nagiging superpower na kaya medyo alangan na ang US
 
You seem to be completely underestimating china... No superpower would even contemplate of waging war against other, hence the proxy wars these days.

You a big Trump fan? I'm not a china fan, but how did the US become what they are now? By exploiting weak countries, by manipulating and sabotaging world's economy. By the way, in the last 100 years how many countries did china invade vs the US' under the false pretense of "freedom"?

I don't want to live in an alternate reality where a single superpower has a grip on the entire glob.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the US is the only superpower left. China is not a superpower and will never be. Do you know what it was like when the Soviet Union was still a thing? Forced imposition of its political and economic systems on other nations, forced famines, purges, state-sponsored terrorism, genocides that left over 100 million people dead. How about the British Empire? 80 million dead in just one country, entire civilizations in three continents wiped out. If anything, the US is the most restrained even though the most powerful military global power in history.

The world needs only one superpower to maintain balance of power, and that nation best be the one that was made on the backbone of the Enlightenment. A superpower nation with a completely antithetical political and cultural values would only lead to catastrophic results. Two or more superpowers imminently leads to a world war. We're actually currently living in the most peaceful period in human history. Thanks to the collapse of European colonial powers and the Soviet Union, and the emergence and predominance of the US as the sole superpower.

The US was already a highly industrialized nation before it embarked on its imperialistic journey. Prosperity is guaranteed to any nation who is able to produce and capitalize on the Industrial Revolution even if it's guilty of exploiting other nations or not. Switzerland, Iceland, Luxembourg, Finland are prosperous nations and they never colonized anyone.

China is nothing without the US and other Western countries. These countries buy and invest more to China than China's total cost of import and foreign investment. If these countries were to pull out their businesses from China, China's economy will immediately crumble. No timeline needed. Western countries will be fine outsourcing their manufacturing to other developing nations instead.
 
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the US is the only superpower left. China is not a superpower and will never be. Do you know what it was like when the Soviet Union was still a thing? Forced imposition of its political and economic systems on other nations, forced famines, purges, state-sponsored terrorism, genocides that left over 100 million people dead. How about the British Empire? 80 million dead in just one country, entire civilizations in three continents wiped out. If anything, the US is the most restrained even though the most powerful military global power in history.

The world needs only one superpower to maintain balance of power, ...
Agree sana...pero. What does the word balance means? The counterreaction of two or more forces. To balance, to counter something. You can't have a balance if there is a monopoly.

...and that nation best be the one that was made on the backbone of the Enlightenment. A superpower nation with a completely antithetical political and cultural values would only lead to catastrophic results. Two or more superpowers imminently leads to a world war. We're actually currently living in the most peaceful period in human history. Thanks to the collapse of European colonial powers and the Soviet Union, and the emergence and predominance of the US as the sole superpower.

The US was already a highly industrialized nation before it embarked on its imperialistic journey. Prosperity is guaranteed to any nation who is able to produce and capitalize on the Industrial Revolution even if it's guilty of exploiting other nations or not. Switzerland, Iceland, Luxembourg, Finland are prosperous nations and they never colonized anyone.

China is nothing without the US and other Western countries. These countries buy and invest more to China than China's total cost of import and foreign investment. If these countries were to pull out their businesses from China, China's economy will immediately crumble. No timeline needed. Western countries will be fine outsourcing their manufacturing to other developing nations instead.
"China is nothing without the US..." Did you even ask how the US and Western countries without the manufacturing capabilities of china? Do you think they "invested" in china simply because they want to improve/develop china? No, they "invest" simply because that is the most PROFITABLE for them. Kung talagang they want to look after their citizenry, why did they even move the production to china? Why didn't they employ their locals. Because the mantra of capitalism is profit first before the welfare of your citizenry or anything else.

So don't even think that by moving their production to china they are making any favor to china or to their country. They are only making favor to themselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top