Point proven? You didn't "prove" any point. Points for you? Congratulations on winning a nonexistent competition.
Sadly, instead of backing up your case and proving you actually have a "master's degree" in Political Science, you only made your claim even more questionable.
As a prelaw graduate, I know that's one of the basic logical fallacies taught on Week 1/2 in prelaw programs, including Political Science. Do you? Maybe not.
I thought we were all on the same side in the battle against mis/disinformation, but I'm not sure about that now because of the very questionable claim you've made.
PS: Your reply, yet again, is full of grammatical errors. Not very likely of someone holding a "master's degree," really. Faking credentials is a Marcos thing to do. I hope you're not following in his footsteps.
Even though we have never met, it sounds to me that you know very well the history books taught to me and the ones I learned of my own accord, outside of any University or any other educational institution.
Since you claim to know these "dilawan" history/books that I have read very well, could you tell me what they are? Can you name them? It is also bold of you to assume that I have not yet read the memoir Turmoil and Triumph, learned about George Shultz, and did my due diligence on the Reagan administration and philosophy.