bahala kayo awit ang gusto ko lang ay mapanood nio para malaman ang insight nio about don wala na ko magagawa kung sarado ke religious sya atheist man o ano sya na yun parang kasi ay bias kapag religious na tao o athiest di na pakikingan haha
Feel mo lang pala! Kung feel mo lang , huwag mo pilitin sa akin na mag-agree ako sa mga "accusation" mo dahil feel mo lang pala iyon. Hindi ka nakikipag-away pero ikaw ang nagproprovoke na magkaroon ng away at para matigilan ito , kailangan maingat ka sa mga sasabihin mo.
Kaya nagkakaroon ng "heated" dito na pwede magkaroon ng inclination ng "away" dahil ipinipilit mo ang gusto mo mangyari kaya huwag mo ipipilit kungdi "sasabog" tayo dalawa. Magkakaroon na ito ng away.
Pinipilit mo. Huwag kang makulit. Kung totoo ang sinasabi mo , baguhin mo ang accusation mo sa akin dahil mali ang parata mo sa akin. Same lang tayo nagpipilitan. Pinipilit mo.
Pinipilit mo. Huwag kang makulit. Kung totoo ang sinasabi mo , baguhin mo ang accusation mo sa akin dahil mali ang parata mo sa akin. Same lang tayo nagpipilitan. Pinipilit mo.
bahala kayo awit ang gusto ko lang ay mapanood nio para malaman ang insight nio about don wala na ko magagawa kung sarado ke religious sya atheist man o ano sya na yun parang kasi ay bias kapag religious na tao o athiest di na pakikingan haha
nope, ang dami kong religious na tao na pinapakinggan, yung mga professors dito sa UP are religious pero ang sarap pakinggan pag nag discuss sila sa lessons, that means i can actually listen to religious people as long as they don't speak about religion
to the max pa talaga promotion mo sa kanya na he'll speak about science pero yung intro niya "going to hell" haha
i cannot engage to any form of belief boss, i only do describing, so if multo is observable then i would describe it instead of believing on it
nope, ang dami kong religious na tao na pinapakinggan, yung mga professors dito sa UP are religious pero ang sarap pakinggan pag nag discuss sila sa lessons, that means i can actually listen to religious people as long as they don't speak about religion
to the max pa talaga promotion mo sa kanya na he'll speak about science pero yung intro niya "going to hell" haha
i cannot engage to any form of belief boss, i only do describing, so if multo is observable then i would describe it instead of believing on it
nope, ang dami kong religious na tao na pinapakinggan, yung mga professors dito sa UP are religious pero ang sarap pakinggan pag nag discuss sila sa lessons, that means i can actually listen to religious people as long as they don't speak about religion
to the max pa talaga promotion mo sa kanya na he'll speak about science pero yung intro niya "going to hell" haha
di namn sya nag speak ng religion oh nag prpromote ng kung ano yung paliwnag nya kasi malinaw at nag speak sya ng going to hell dahil yun ang topic matatamaan talaga ang topic na predestination ang religion kasi yun ung punto don gets mo so kung ayaw mo panoorin di wag di ko sya prinopromote yung paliwanag nya lang ang gusto ko mapakingan nnio haha
di namn sya nag speak ng religion oh nag prpromote ng kung ano yung paliwnag nya kasi malinaw at nag speak sya ng going to hell dahil yun ang topic matatamaan talaga ang topic na predestination ang religion kasi yun ung punto don gets mo so kung ayaw mo panoorin di wag di ko sya prinopromote yung paliwanag nya lang ang gusto ko mapakingan nnio haha
pinanood ko na talaga boss kasi i trusted you but it turned out he made multiverse a scientific theory even if it is not, it is only a hypothesis that arises from different fields starting from physics up to the field of speculative fiction, very wrong
we are not capable of believing something that we are already observing haha nasa harap muna believing ka pa din? we only believe those things that cannot be observed, sample is god, we cannot observe god so all we can do is just believe in god, kaya nga tawag is belief
on the other hand we also have so-called observable things like stars, they are readily observable using telescope so we no longer believe but describe them that "they are stars"
that's what science do, only describing the things observed, there is no belief in science
we are not capable of believing something that we are already observing haha nasa harap muna believing ka pa din? we only believe those things that cannot be observed, sample is god, we cannot observe god so all we can do is just believe in god, kaya nga tawag is belief
on the other hand we also have so-called observable things like stars, they are readily observable using telescope so we no longer believe but describe them that "they are stars"
that's what science do, only describing the things observed, there is no belief in science
Sabi mo kasi you can't engage on something to believe. Kaya nga tinanong kita tungkol sa multo kung naniniwala ka. Sabi mo you can describe it instead of believing. (Dito na sense na alam mo din nag eexist ang multo (ghost)). Mukhang inaayon mo lang nga hahaha. Sabi mo pa if science is more on describing than believing, how about the belief about Charles Darwin's theory of evolution? Theory=unproven, but they believe it could be.
Sabi mo kasi you can't engage on something to believe. Kaya nga tinanong kita tungkol sa multo kung naniniwala ka. Sabi mo you can describe it instead of believing. (Dito na sense na alam mo din nag eexist ang multo (ghost)). Mukhang inaayon mo lang nga hahaha. Sabi mo pa if science is more on describing than believing, how about the belief about Charles Darwin's theory of evolution? Theory=unproven, but they believe it could be.
meron condition iyan boss in order for us to be able to describe something, it should be observable, if only a ghost is observable then i can describe it, science is not more on describing than believing, it is describing and not believing, there is no belief in science, tungkol naman sa theory of evolution, science just described those fossils as "remains of the ancient" by performing carbon dating to them and be able to describe how many years ago that these fossils started to exist, iba kasi ang scientific theory sa theory theory lang hehe meron iyan evidence bossing
meron condition iyan boss in order for us to be able to describe something, it should be observable, if only a ghost is observable then i can describe it, science is not more on describing than believing, it is describing and not believing, there is no belief in science, tungkol naman sa theory of evolution, science just described those fossils as "remains of the ancient" by performing carbon dating to them and be able to describe how many years ago that these fossils started to exist, iba kasi ang scientific theory sa theory theory lang hehe meron iyan evidence bossing