What's new

Trivia PMA classmates air support for Wescom chief on leave

1715788540777.png

CLASSMATES of Vice Adm. Alberto Carlos at the Philippine Military Academy (PMA), who went on leave last week as chief of the AFP Western Command (Wescom) amid talks of a supposed “new model” arrangement with China, threw support to the Navy officer.

Source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
 

Attachments

itong si carlos parang si morales din, he authenticated na nga yung transcript pero gina-gang-up ng gobyerno yung character niya

armed forces na kalaban ng gobyerno, mukhang nangangamoy layas na si bangag
 
tagilid itong mga to, malakas ang lobby ng US ngayon sa PH govt at media, uwimas muna sana sila, ng no comment nalang muna sana
 
I wonder why would these Chinese diplomats reach out directly to the Vice Admiral and not in their counterpart?
hindi negotiation ang nangyari bossing, tapos na ang negotiation, meron na agreement, pina-confirm lang sa ground which is the WESCOM
palpak yung ginawa nang Admiral, tsaka pansin ko yung PMA class alumni parang circle of jerk lang.
palpak in sense na nilaglag siya ng mga heads niya? or you just think siya ang negotiator?
 
hindi negotiation ang nangyari bossing, tapos na ang negotiation, meron na agreement, pina-confirm lang sa ground which is the WESCOM
Still the Chinese diplomat does not have the power to confirm agreements with the Vice Admiral of WESCOM. There is no law or information about a Chinese diplomat having the authority to make binding agreements with a Philippine military official. Diplomatic negotiations typically involve higher-level officials from both countries, not military commanders.
 
Last edited:
And this the part of gentlemen agreement between Duterte and Xi? AFAIK mag resupply lang ang Navy.
hehe di mo alam details ng gentlemen's agreement? the gentlemen's agreement is to maintain the status quo in the region, this means China won't claim new islands as long as the Philippines won't do it as well
Still the Chinese diplomat does not have the power to confirm agreements with the Vice Admiral of WESCOM. There is no law or information about a Chinese diplomat having the authority to make binding agreements with a Philippine military official. Diplomatic negotiations typically involve higher-level officials from both countries, not military commanders.
hindi nga negotiation ang nangyari haha, tapos na ang negotiation, meron na nga agreement, bakit paulit ulit ka ng narrative mo about diplomat making agreements with military official?
 
Last edited:
hehe di mo alam details ng gentlemen's agreement? the gentlemen's agreement is to maintain the status quo in the region, this means China won't claim new islands as long as the Philippines won't do it as well
Additionally according to Roque, the agreement allowed for the delivery of basic supplies to the BRP Sierra Madre but prohibited the construction of military outposts or the use of construction materials for its repairs but did not explicitly mention the removal of the BRP Sierra Madre from the Ayungin Shoal.

Also the agreement's legality was not formally documented or ratified by the Philippine government which is very questionable. The 2016 arbitral ruling recognized the Philippines' exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the South China Sea, which includes the Ayungin Shoal. The agreement's restrictions on the BRP Sierra Madre's repairs and maintenance seen as a violation of this ruling.
hindi nga negotiation ang nangyari haha, tapos na ang negotiation, meron na nga agreement, bakit paulit ulit ka ng narrative mo about diplomat making agreements with military official?
gentleman's agreement is not a legally binding agreement and cannot be used to confirm agreements between diplomats or military officials. Formal, written agreements are necessary for legally enforceable agreements in diplomatic and international relations.
 
Additionally according to Roque, the agreement allowed for the delivery of basic supplies to the BRP Sierra Madre but prohibited the construction of military outposts or the use of construction materials for its repairs but did not explicitly mention the removal of the BRP Sierra Madre from the Ayungin Shoal.
correct because that's the status quo, no military activities on that region because the status quo is that China claimed that particular shoal and it should be maintained like that, humanitarian activities lang (which include fishing) at walang military
Also the agreement's legality was not formally documented or ratified by the Philippine government which is very questionable.
it means di mo alam what is a gentlemen's agreement haha gentlemen's nga lang eh ba't gusto mo ipa-record haha
The 2016 arbitral ruling recognized the Philippines' exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the South China Sea, which includes the Ayungin Shoal. The agreement's restrictions on the BRP Sierra Madre's repairs and maintenance seen as a violation of this ruling.
EEZ is not a territorial power or ownership bossing
gentleman's agreement is not a legally binding agreement and cannot be used to confirm agreements between diplomats or military officials. Formal, written agreements are necessary for legally enforceable agreements in diplomatic and international relations.
that is the very reason why it is only called a gentlemen's agreement haha di mo talaga get's what agreements are considered as gentlemen's only
 
hindi negotiation ang nangyari bossing, tapos na ang negotiation, meron na agreement, pina-confirm lang sa ground which is the WESCOM

palpak in sense na nilaglag siya ng mga heads niya? or you just think siya ang negotiator?

state your facts na nilalag sya, tapos post mo dito nagpapatunay na sya yung scapegoat.
 
state your facts na nilalag sya, tapos post mo dito nagpapatunay na sya yung scapegoat.
bakit boss di mo alam na China was accused of wiretapping? it is very obvious na wiretapping makes the transcript authentic and when that transcript becomes authentic edi laglag na ni WESCOM bossing
 
that is the very reason why it is only called a gentlemen's agreement haha di mo talaga get's what agreements are considered as gentlemen's only
Do you have a legal basis for this? You know naman kung wala kang mapanghawakan na papel or idaan ito sa legal way, pwede baguhin ng both paties ang kanilang agreement with or without the other parties involve.
 
Do you have a legal basis for this? You know naman kung wala kang mapanghawakan na papel or idaan ito sa legal way, pwede baguhin ng both paties ang kanilang agreement with or without the other parties involve.
haha until now di mo pa rin ma-gets bakit tinawag na gentlemen's agreement lang, naghahanap ka pa din ng legal basis haha kawawa ka naman
 
haha until now di mo pa rin ma-gets bakit tinawag na gentlemen's agreement lang, naghahanap ka pa din ng legal basis haha kawawa ka naman
So you supporting this agreement even if you know it is not legal? Pwede naman balewalain ng current administration yan dahil wala naman pinang hahawakan ang China na kasulatan.
 
So you supporting this agreement even if you know it is not legal? Pwede naman balewalain ng current administration yan dahil wala naman pinang hahawakan ang China na kasulatan.
a gentlemen's agreement is an un-documented agreement boss, before you can say an agreement is îllégâl, you must ensure that an agreement actually exist, so how can you ensure the existence of an agreement if it's not even documented?
 
a gentlemen's agreement is an un-documented agreement boss, before you can say an agreement is îllégâl, you must ensure that an agreement actually exist, so how can you ensure the existence of an agreement if it's not even documented?
If that so Philippines has no basis to comply to these agreement right? Since this is un-documented and only Duterte and the Chinese goverment made this deal.
 
If that so Philippines has no basis to comply to these agreement right? Since this is un-documented and only Duterte and the Chinese goverment made this deal.
yup in fact vangag junior declared that whatever agreement exist between the previous admin and china is void, so that's the reason why china resumes in their claims since the status quo is now null and void
 
yup in fact vangag junior declared that whatever agreement exist between the previous admin and china is void, so that's the reason why china resumes in their claims since the status quo is now null and void
To simplify Duterte and co already knew there would be a problem if they put the agreement on the legal way kaya ginawa na lang gentleman's agreement para ma push through lang ito.
 

Similar threads

Users search this thread by keywords

  1. Xmen 97
Back
Top