Court cases ni Marcos Jr.
1995 Tax case conviction
On July 27, 1995, the
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. Judge Benedicto Ulep convicted Marcos to seven years in jail and a fine of US$2,812 plus back taxes for
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. in his failure to file an
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. from the period of 1982 to 1985 while sitting as the vice governor of Ilocos Norte (1980–1983) and as governor of Ilocos Norte (1983–1986). Marcos subsequently appealed the decision to the
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. over his conviction.
On October 31, 1997, the Court of Appeals affirmed the earlier decision with Marcos being convicted for the failure of the filing of an income tax return under Section 45 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1977 while being acquitted under the charge of violating Section 50 of the same statute. In spite of the removal of the penalty of imprisonment, Marcos was ordered the payment of
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. to the
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. (BIR) with interest and the issuance of corresponding fines of PHP2,000 per count of non-filing of income tax returns from 1982 to 1984 and PHP30,000 for 1985, plus the accrued interest. Marcos later filed a petition for
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. to the
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. over the modified conviction imposed by the Court of Appeals but subsequently withdrew his petition on August 8, 2001, thereby declaring the ruling as final and executory.
In 2021, the Quezon City Regional Trial Court certified that there were no records on file of Marcos settling the corresponding tax dues and fines. However, according to a Manila Times report, documents issued by the Supreme Court, the BIR, and a receipt issued by the
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. state that the tax dues were ρáíd, while elections commissioner
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. noted that the documents Marcos submitted to the
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. were not receipts of taxes ρáíd to the BIR but rather receipts from the Land Bank for lease rentals.
2007 Payanig sa Pasig property case motion
On June 19, 2007,Marcos Jr. filed a motion to intervene in, OCLP v. PCGG, Civil Case Number 0093 at the Sandiganbayan, the Philippines' anti-graft court. The case had been filed by Ortigas & Company, Ltd. Partnership (OCLP) against the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) over the 18-hectare former Payanig sa Pasig property bordered Ortigas, Doña Julia Vargas and Meralco Avenues in Pasig City, which had been the site of the 'Payanig sa Pasig' theme park, but is now the location of various businesses, most notably the
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. shopping and recreation complex.
Part of the Marcoses' ill-gotten wealth, the PCGG considers the property the "crown jewel" among the properties sequestered from the Marcoses' ill-gotten wealth, estimating its minimum value to be about PHP16.5 billion in March 2015. The property had been surrendered to the PCGG in 1986, as part of the settlement deal of Marcos crony
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now., who was holding the property under various companies on Marcos Sr.'s behalf. Ortigas & Company countered that Marcos Sr. had coerced them to sell the property to him in 1968.Marcos Jr.'s motion claimed that his father had bought the property legally, but the Sandiganbayan dismissed his motion on October 18, 2008, saying it had already dismissed a similar motion filed years earlier by his mother Imelda.
2011 Hawaii contempt judgement
In 2011, the Hawaii District Court ruled Bongbong Marcos and his mother Imelda Marcos to be in contempt, fining them USD353.6 million fine for not respecting an injunction from a 1992 judgement in a Human Rights Victims case, which commanded them not to dissipate the assets of Ferdinand Marcos' estate.The ruling was upheld by the US' Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on October 24, 2012, and is believed to be "the largest contempt award ever affirmed by an appellate court." While the 1992 case was against Ferdinand Marcos, the 2011 judgment was against Imelda and Bongbong personally.The judgement also effectively barred Imelda and Bongbong from entering any US territory.
doon na kami sa magnanakaw at sinungaling, ayaw namin sa walang walang bahid ng corruption. Solid bbm kahit latagan mo kami ng facts, UNITHIEVES lang malakas. Kahit maghirap kami bbm pa rin 