yeah strongly agree that there is no need to become atheist since no one can prove both the existence and the absence of the so called god
science only has natural selection but no designer
That is what the naturalists would say. However, the cosmological premise that the universe has a beginning and the mathematical probabilities of a universe being created suggest that there is a designer.
science only has big bang plus continuous expansion for universe's beginning but still no designer
dagdag ko na din, still from einstein: Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind
Paano po?
uniqueness is a random mutation in the genome as it interacts with environment producing variants or variations in traits, some variants survive more than the others and so we can say the surviving variant is the current evolved form of that organism parang pokemon ba hehe
Survival of the fittest po ba 'yun?
yeah the fittest will leave the most copies of itself in successive generations, the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life
Ang ibig niyo po bang sabihin ay ang unang nabubuhay na organism ay unti-unting naging iba’t ibang uri ng bagay na may buhay, kasama na ang tao, sa pamamagitan ng random mutation at ng natural selection?
di naman naging ibang uri ng living things, kundi ang unang nabubuhay ay unti unting napapalitan ng mas fit na variant as it mutates into more variants hence we will always have the endangered species
Ahhh. How about naman po sa tao? Galing kaya sa hayop na nag-evolve o ibang bagay or talagang may tao simula pa noong una at nag-evolve lang kung paano mag-isip?, Or ano po?
it applies to all organisms, tao is not exempted, the same process pa din ang sa tao, we all started as carbon molecule, we can say all living things (plants animals humans) trace back to the carbon molecules during the big bang
If you are still trying to push the validity of natural selection as a valid presupposition of no designer, then you deny the valid claim of the mathematical improbablity of creation of the universe, let alone the transformation of non-life to life, via random events. You have to rationally distinguish the difference of the natural probabilities of an event to occur to infinitesimal chance of an event to happen. And based on your insistent belief of natural selection, you definitely failed to distinguish it.
the mathematical impossibility of evolution is a further discovery, eventually that mathematical impossibility of evolution will lead to another theory that will de-throne the theory of evolution, but in your case the "mathematical impossibility of evolution" does not mean there is presence of designer automatically, the next theory may prove the designer idea but as of the moment it is still the theory of evolution that is accepted as the most accurate description
Big bang. Medyo pamilyar saakin 'yan.
.i strongly agree that the bible may have answered the question but since then science have not accepted the bible's anwer, it had gone silent instead
nag sama sama is not scientific, saan ba galing iyan, science never mentioned sama-sama or merging, it mentioned an expansion, the opposite hehe
it is not stated as the truth, it is just stated as the most accurate description for now, theories tend to predict something and their prediction is being compared to a result of trials, continuous testing iyan so possible pa din ma de-throne
hehe minsan kasi nagbabasa ako pero di sila pang reference dahil they're not so convincing for me, so i only post them as my opinion only hehe
aba gusto ko iyan mga share share, i need more information badly, feed me with more data kahit mga opinion niyo lang iyan big help iyan saken in my own analysis kahit pa nagbabangayan tayo information is flowing pa dinAnyway, gusto ko po sana i-share sayo. yun ay kung interested ka po, kung hindi naman, walang problema.
