What's new

Trivia Gamitan ng sintido komon

Kala ko nga din nung una malalim. Pero legit tlga sya, un lng tlga sinabi niya. At proud pa. Pano kaya ito sa tunay na buhay nuh. Nakakacurious lng.
Thats what ive been wondering nga din eh.. nascam ata tayo paps… hahahahaha

hehe supposedly na lang siya ngayun kasi i find it as subject talaga siya sa mindset ng writer or the will of the writer or speaker this time as you mentioned about spoken history
Alin nga dun ang “supposedly”??

Kasi sabi mo:
history is supposedly a record of past events,
Aling part ng statement na yan ba ang doubtful ka kaya sabi mo na supposedly??

Supposedly record
Suppersedly past

Or baka u meant supposedly “accurate” record of the past??

Kung yan ibig mo sabihin eh medyo.. medyo lang ha.. na may tama ka… pd nman talaga magkamali or inaccurate ang isang account ng past event… pero iniimbestigahan yan.. pinagaaralan… even books nga narerevised kung napatunayan na mali ang historical accounts na laman…

Eh sayo kasi generalized na agad…

History = supposedly “idk”
Censorship = bad/hate
Interdependence = bad/hate

Ano pba ung mga pinoproblema mo sa buhay paps??
 
Last edited:
Kung yan ibig mo sabihin eh medyo.. medyo lang ha.. na may tama ka… pd nman talaga magkamali or inaccurate ang isang account ng past event… pero iniimbestigahan yan.. pinagaaralan… even books nga narerevised kung napatunayan na mali ang historical accounts na laman…

Eh sayo kasi generalized na agad…
wow good for you na nakita mong ini-investigate pala iyon, para sakin na di nakakita ng ganoon i'll stick to history as subject to the bias of whoever writes it
Ano pba ung mga pinoproblema mo sa buhay paps??
di ko sila problema, they are my principles of life hehe natatanging problema ko lang is yung mga adik na nagkalat sa lansangan
Ahh ok.
So ang sinasabi mo pala history is subject to biases of the writer. Therefore, its unreliable. Ano kinalaman nyan as a response to:

When it is not the question or the context of the question?

Katulad din sa kabilang thread. Ang context ng topic is political belief at socio economics. I made a statement that mention the phrase "not to mention ung mga religious leaders"
Akala mo na agad nakikipagtalo ka sa isang theist.
"Iniiwasan agad ang religion"
thanks for your comment about irrelevance, i'll consider it in my analysis hehe
Nabanggit dito na may degree ka daw.. May kilala ako makakatulong mag refund kung gusto mo.
hehe thanks but no thanks
 
Last edited:
haha popcorn po kayo jan haha btw

about po sa pag i investigation ng mga books well di ko alam kung lahat naiimbistigahan, pero audit po ang trabaho ko and every docs or any information na isasubmit mo e may magfifield audit or in other words may magpapatunay muna bago mai published sa public btw haha nawawala antok ko kakabasa haha
 
haha popcorn po kayo jan haha btw

about po sa pag i investigation ng mga books well di ko alam kung lahat naiimbistigahan, pero audit po ang trabaho ko and every docs or any information na isasubmit mo e may magfifield audit or in other words may magpapatunay muna bago mai published sa public btw haha nawawala antok ko kakabasa haha
sa auditing din ako now eh haha .. triple check bawat audit eh, baka may mali hahaha

baka bglang mabawasan yung sahod haha
 
wow good for you na nakita mong ini-investigate pala iyon, para sakin na di nakakita ng ganoon i'll stick to history as subject to the bias of whoever writes it

di ko sila problema, they are my principles of life hehe natatanging problema ko lang is yung mga adik na nagkalat sa lansangan

thanks for your comment about irrelevance, i'll consider it in my analysis hehe

hehe thanks but no thanks
Seryoso ka?? Hindi ka aware sa mga studies and investigation about historical events??

So pano mo nasabi na may bias ung mga writers?? Diba nagcheck ka din.. naginvestigate...or maybe basehan mo para sabihing bias eh may nabasa or nakita ka na un ang pananaw or contradicting dun sa written history na alam mo... Thats u investigating as well...kita mo ba un??

Or sinasabi mo lang yang bias na yan ng walang kahit anong rason??

Principles in real life or alter ego mo lang??
Adik sa lansangan.. so pag ung nag aadik eh introvert na akward socially at sa bahay lang nag aadik di ba sya kasmaa??
 
Seryoso ka?? Hindi ka aware sa mga studies and investigation about historical events??

So pano mo nasabi na may bias ung mga writers?? Diba nagcheck ka din.. naginvestigate...or maybe basehan mo para sabihing bias eh may nabasa or nakita ka na un ang pananaw or contradicting dun sa written history na alam mo... Thats u investigating as well...kita mo ba un??

Or sinasabi mo lang yang bias na yan ng walang kahit anong rason??
hehe hinihintay ko talagang baguhin na ang wikipedia entries ng marcos, wala pa talaga akong nakitang investigation boss, nakita ko lang is mga mukhang investigator haha kagaya ko nag investigate pero di authorize mag edit ng history, bias in a sense na meron na-inject na unverifieable entries
Principles in real life or alter ego mo lang??
thanks for the comment about alter ego boss, check ko iyan mamaya sa analysis ko, meantime i'll stick muna sa principles ko
Adik sa lansangan.. so pag ung nag aadik eh introvert na akward socially at sa bahay lang nag aadik di ba sya kasmaa??
ang adik sa lansangan lang talaga problema ko boss, pabor ako sa adik na wala sa lansangan para mapabilis ang pagkamatay nila
 
hehe hinihintay ko talagang baguhin na ang wikipedia entries ng marcos, wala pa talaga akong nakitang investigation boss, nakita ko lang is mga mukhang investigator haha kagaya ko nag investigate pero di authorize mag edit ng history, bias in a sense na meron na-inject na unverifieable entries

thanks for the comment about alter ego boss, check ko iyan mamaya sa analysis ko, meantime i'll stick muna sa principles ko

ang adik sa lansangan lang talaga problema ko boss, pabor ako sa adik na wala sa lansangan para mapabilis ang pagkamatay nila
Bat napunta na kay marcos??

I dont think magiging authorize nga ikaw to investigate and revised history…baka masyado na mataas yang level ng scientific methods, synonyms at analysis mo…

So tingin mo ung mga nakapagauthorize supposedly na magedit ng history is bias because?? Ung mga revisions ba pd iadd na kahit sino or may validation and investigation pa ding nagaganap?

Asan jan ung wlang investigation na sinasabi mo??
 
Bat napunta na kay marcos??
ok lang iyan if di mo na gets boss
I dont think magiging authorize nga ikaw to investigate and revised history…baka masyado na mataas yang level ng scientific methods, synonyms at analysis mo…
oo nga hanggang personal consumption ko lang mga audits ko hehe
So tingin mo ung mga nakapagauthorize supposedly na magedit ng history is bias because?? Ung mga revisions ba pd iadd na kahit sino or may validation and investigation pa ding nagaganap?
di pa ako nakakita ng na-edit sa history so si orig writer muna bias saken
 
*common Christian theists making claims and the supporting argument is Bible be like :
FB_IMG_1668008957102.jpg
 

Attachments

Hahaha.. Sensya na pero di ko mapigilang di mapacomment.. Try to explore more outside the box. Masyadong mababaw yung interpretation mo boss sa mga bagay-bagay lalo na ang basis ng bias mo ay science. Did you also know that Science and religion are closely interconnected in the scientific study of religion, which can be traced back to seventeenth-century natural histories of religion. Natural historians attempted to provide naturalistic explanations for human behavior and culture, including religion and morality.

Pero natutuwa ako kahit introvert ka kamo eh you can express yourself through this forum. Kudos to you and 2nd time ko na nakita itong mga linyanan mo boss plhbg1.
 
Hahaha.. Sensya na pero di ko mapigilang di mapacomment.. Try to explore more outside the box. Masyadong mababaw yung interpretation mo boss sa mga bagay-bagay lalo na ang basis ng bias mo ay science. Did you also know that Science and religion are closely interconnected in the scientific study of religion, which can be traced back to seventeenth-century natural histories of religion. Natural historians attempted to provide naturalistic explanations for human behavior and culture, including religion and morality.
attempt lang naman pala, ok lang iyan kasi i don't think history is scientific din naman so di ako interested diyan, now you think science is a closed box well good luck with that, thanks by the way 😇
Pero natutuwa ako kahit introvert ka kamo eh you can express yourself through this forum. Kudos to you and 2nd time ko na nakita itong mga linyanan mo boss plhbg1.
that would mean i can't have a sense of humor hehe
 

About this Thread

  • 54
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 8
    Participants
Last reply from:
plhbg1

Online statistics

Members online
586
Guests online
3,323
Total visitors
3,909
Back
Top