What's new

Trivia Gamitan ng sintido komon

ehehe which part of history is literature did you not understand?
Actually wala ako naintindihan jan. Sayo ko lng nakita yang phrase na yan. Kahit anong pagkalap ko ng information about "history is literature" sa kahit anong context wala akong makita. Pakipaliwanag.
 
Actually wala ako naintindihan jan. Sayo ko lng nakita yang phrase na yan. Kahit anong pagkalap ko ng information about "history is literature" sa kahit anong context wala akong makita. Pakipaliwanag.
that would mean you don't agree that history is literature hehe
 
No. That would mean that the phrase "history is literature" does not have a well understood meaning. It has no sense, unless it is rephrased or defined, no one can agree or disagree with this statement.

Did you mean history is a fiction?

Did you mean history is a written text?

If I dont use the dictionary, there is no way to define the statement.
 
Last edited:
No. That would mean that the phrase "history is literature" does not have a well understood meaning. It has no sense, unless it is rephrased or defined, no one can agree or disagree with this statement.

Did you mean history is a fiction?

Did you mean history is a written text?

If I dont use the dictionary, there is no way to define the statement.
nope, literal talaga na literature ang tinutukoy ko diyan
 
Bakit nope? Hnd ba literal ung meaning ng literature na sinasabi ko?
"Literature is written" hnd nmn ata figurative speech yan. Ano ba literal na meaning sayo?
ay oo nga pala you are just describing what literature is hehe bo̾bo ko talaga, sige tama iyan yun nga ibig ko sabihin diyan
 
hmm ok lang iyan boss, i am the only one who does not consider the dictionary meaning of history, i don't follow history since for me sila ay literature na lamang written by someone who does write
ay oo nga pala you are just describing what literature is hehe bo̾bo ko talaga, sige tama iyan yun nga ibig ko sabihin diyan

So you dont follow history dahil nakasulat ito. Anong form ng history ang finofollow mo? Ung spoken history?
 
So you dont follow history dahil nakasulat ito. Anong form ng history ang finofollow mo? Ung spoken history?
i no longer follow history but i still quote some events para i-share para sa inyong mga naniniwala kasi magiging valid pa din naman sila para sa inyo kahit hindi sa akin

Written din kasi ang science paps. Chismis nlng ang hnd written ngayon. Baka may issue din sya sa scientific literatures dahil written ito by someone who can write.
science has prediction about the past but they are verifiable in the present (the calculations can still be performed), history only records what happened in the past and i find it not scientific hehe
 
Last edited:
i no longer follow history but i still quote some events para i-share para sa inyong mga naniniwala kasi magiging valid pa din naman sila para sa inyo kahit hindi sa akin


science has prediction about the past but they are verifiable in the present (the calculations can still be performed), history only records what happened in the past and i find it not scientific hehe
pano yung history ng science?
 
hmm ok lang iyan boss, i am the only one who does not consider the dictionary meaning of history, i don't follow history since for me sila ay literature na lamang written by someone who does write
Huh??? Ohhkay?? Im asking you kung ano meaning and ur answer is literature written by blah blah... "Written history" or mga historical texts are indeed literature.. pero the word itself na history and mythology ano meaning sayo.. regardless if they are written or not...

Tingin mo ata sa history ung literal na nasa history books... 🥴
 
Huh??? Ohhkay?? Im asking you kung ano meaning and ur answer is literature written by blah blah... "Written history" or mga historical texts are indeed literature.. pero the word itself na history and mythology ano meaning sayo.. regardless if they are written or not...
history is supposedly a record of past events, mythology is about myths
Tingin mo ata sa history ung literal na nasa history books... 🥴
knowledge about history come to us in the form of books
 
Written din kasi ang science paps. Chismis nlng ang hnd written ngayon. Baka may issue din sya sa scientific literatures dahil written ito by someone who can write.
Hahaha.. nasusundan mo pa ba yang sinasabi nean.. i warned u na minsan hirap intindihin ng mga sinasabi nean eh... Akala ko nung una cryptic lang eh...hahahaha

history is supposedly a record of past events, mythology is about myths

knowledge about history come to us in the form of books
"Supposedly" -- ano iniimply mo jan na about history as supposedly a record of past events??

Books are one form.. sguro nman alam mo how ung mode of transmission ng information ng tao eh nagbago...from symbolic writings sa mga kweba, oral, written, and now na meron na din audio and video... So since it went beyond na sa sinasbi mo na books ang source ng knowlegde about history..ano na pananawa mo now about history??
 
Last edited:
Hahaha.. nasusundan mo pa ba yang sinasabi nean.. i warned u na minsan hirap intindihin ng mga sinasabi nean eh... Akala ko nung una cryptic lang eh...hahahaha
Kala ko nga din nung una malalim. Pero legit tlga sya, un lng tlga sinabi niya. At proud pa. Pano kaya ito sa tunay na buhay nuh. Nakakacurious lng.
 
"Supposedly" -- ano iniimply mo jan na about history as supposedly a record of past events??
Books are one form.. sguro nman alam mo how ung mode of transmission ng information ng tao eh nagbago...from symbolic writings sa mga kweba, oral, written, and now na meron na din audio and video... So since it went beyond na sa sinasbi mo na books ang source ng knowlegde about history..ano na pananawa mo now about history??
hehe supposedly na lang siya ngayun kasi i find it as subject talaga siya sa mindset ng writer or the will of the writer or speaker this time as you mentioned about spoken history
 
hehe supposedly na lang siya ngayun kasi i find it as subject talaga siya sa mindset ng writer or the will of the writer or speaker this time as you mentioned about spoken history
Ahh ok.
So ang sinasabi mo pala history is subject to biases of the writer. Therefore, its unreliable. Ano kinalaman nyan as a response to:
Can u differentiate mythology from history?? Wanna know lang kung alam mo ung difference nung 2...
When it is not the question or the context of the question?

Katulad din sa kabilang thread. Ang context ng topic is political belief at socio economics. I made a statement that mention the phrase "not to mention ung mga religious leaders"
Akala mo na agad nakikipagtalo ka sa isang theist.
"Iniiwasan agad ang religion"

Nabanggit dito na may degree ka daw.. May kilala ako makakatulong mag refund kung gusto mo.
 

About this Thread

  • 54
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 8
    Participants
Last reply from:
plhbg1

Online statistics

Members online
311
Guests online
3,799
Total visitors
4,110
Back
Top