Since nasagot ko na si TS kanina heto naman ang insight ko. Hehe.
I find the questions somewhat flawed.
Walang pinanganak na automatically paglabas sa sinapupunan ng ina nila e matik may leadership skills na agad. Maaaring title meron na agad sila pero yung skills? Wala pa. Lahat ng magagaling na lider ay dumaan sa matinding training at pag-aaral.
Isa pa, para sa akin, masyadong malabo at unfair ang term na "natural born leader". Ano bang criteria? Kung magpapakatotoo tayo bale, in a sense, leadership requires opportunity. How can you lead if you've never had the opportunity to do so in the first place? Also, how would you know if you are/you aren't a "natural born leader" if you've never been given the opportunity to train?
Let's take the presidential race as an example. Kapag galing sa isang influential o political family, they have higher chances of being tagged as "official candidates" pero kapag galing sa hindi kilalang sektor o kung saan man, diba tina-tag sila as "nuisance candidates"? E who is to say ba talaga na lahat ng mga na-tag as nuisance candidates ay wala talagang potential or skills to lead? Who's to say na hindi sila "natural born leaders"?
So, you see, doon pa lang na-cancel out na yung konsepto ng "natural born leaders". People will always prefer TRAINED LEADERS. And these "trained leaders" are usually BORN WITH THAT OPPORTUNITY. Kapag sinabi kong opportunity, I meant opportunity para makapag-aral at makapag-train.
Yun lang naman insight ko. HAHAHAHA pwedeng tama ako pero pwede rin mali ako.