What's new

Closed Sɪx ᴅᴇɢʀᴇᴇs ᴏғ sᴇᴘᴀʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴ

Status
Not open for further replies.

Parkenstacker

Honorary Poster
Joined
Jun 23, 2016
Posts
240
Reaction
228
Points
150
images-2.jpg

Six degrees of separation is the theory that any person on the planet can be connected to any other person on the planet through a chain of acquaintances that has no more than five intermediaries. The concept of six degrees of separation is often represented by a graph database, a type of NoSQL database that uses graph theory to store, map and query relationships. Real-world applications of the theory include power grid mapping and analysis, disease transmission mapping and analysis, computer circuitry design and search engine ranking.

The six degrees of separation theory was first proposed in 1929 by the Hungarian writer Frigyes Karinthy in a short story called "Chains." In the 1950s, Ithiel de Sola Pool (MIT) and Manfred Kochen (IBM) set out to prove the theory mathematically. Although they were able to phrase the question mathematically (given a set N of people, what is the probability that each member of N is connected to another member via k_1, k_2, k_3...k_n links?), after twenty years they were still unable to solve the problem to their satisfaction.

In 1967, American sociologist Stanley Milgram devised a new way to test the theory, which he called "the small-world problem." Milgram randomly selected people in the midwest to send packages to a stranger located in Massachusetts. The senders knew the recipient's name, occupation and general location. Each participant was instructed to send the package to a person he knew on a first-name basis who was most likely, out of all the participant's friends, to know the target personally. That person would do the same, and so on until the package was personally delivered to its target recipient. Although participants expected the chain to include at least a hundred intermediaries, it only took (on average) between five and seven intermediaries for each package to be delivered successfully.

Milgram's findings were published in Psychology Today and inspired the phrase "six degrees of separation." Playwright John Guare popularized the phrase when he chose it as the title for his 1990 play. Although Milgram's findings were discounted after it was discovered that he based his conclusion on a very small number of packages, six degrees of separation became an accepted notion in pop culture after Brett C. Tjaden published a computer game on the University of ******ia's Web site based on the small-world problem.

Tjaden used the Internet Movie Database (IMDB) to document connections between different actors. The game, which asked web site visitors to guess the number of connections between the actor Kevin Bacon and any other actor in the dataset, was called The Oracle of Bacon at ******ia. Time magazine selected it as one of the "Ten Best Web Sites of 1996."

In 2001, Duncan Watts, a professor at Columbia University, continued his earlier research into the phenomenon and recreated Milgram's experiment on the Internet. Watts used an email message as the "package" that needed to be delivered, and surprisingly, after reviewing the data collected by 48,000 senders and 19 targets (in 157 countries), Watts found that the average number of intermediaries was indeed six.

In 2008, Microsoft attempted to validate the experiment by analyzing the minimum chain length it would take to connect 180 billion different pairs of users in the Microsoft Messenger database. According to Microsoft's finding, the average chain length was 6.6 hops. In 2016, researchers at Facebook reported that the social networking site had reduced the chain length of its members to three and a half degrees of separation. Dutch mathematician Edsger Dijkstra is credited with developing the algorithm that made it possible for Facebook researchers and others to find the shortest path between two nodes in a graph database.

Source: Margaret Rouse, WhatIs.com
 
Last edited:
Hindi malabo na ang mga PHCorner members ay six degrees separated lamang, 'di ba? How fascinating. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can you give a simpler example of the theory? This article is quite unclear. What was achieved really? What is the significant mechanism?
 
Can you give a simpler example of the theory? This article is quite unclear. What was achieved really? What is the significant mechanism?
'Yung idea na "it's a small world after all" : by means of social linkages (friend of a friend, boss of a friend, friend's boss' daughter's teacher, etc.) one is, at most, separated from any other living person on the planet by six people. Halimbawa, mayroong, at most, six people sa pagitan ninyo ni President Duterte, or other person you can think of. :)
 
parang ito:

First, you think the worst is a broken heart
What's gonna kill you is the second part
And the third is when your world splits down the middle
And fourth, you're gonna think that you fixed yourself
Fifth, you see them out with someone else
And the sixth is when you admit you may have ****ed up a little
 
Nagugulohan ako,pero kahit papaano na explain naman,palagay ko malaki ang tulong nito sa market at economics lalo na sa mga socila media ,kaya pinopondohan nila yung research
 
'Yung idea na "it's a small world after all" : by means of social linkages (friend of a friend, boss of a friend, friend's boss' daughter's teacher, etc.) one is, at most, separated from any other living person on the planet by six people. Halimbawa, mayroong, at most, six people sa pagitan ninyo ni President Duterte, or other person you can think of. :)
That theory is contestable at best. Dapat nagbigay ng formula that we can test sa programming. Walang proof e. Pwedeng magkaruon ng data proving it works ( ciempre kung enclosed system like fb e tayo-tayo magkakasalubungan parang sa phc) and pwede ring may mga data proving ot doesn't work that way (like sa hindi enclosed system, mga hindi internet user hindi mo maestablish connections and relations)
Thinking over it, e fallacious ang theory in practice somehow in fb, kasi dami fake accounts, trolls na wala naman talagan real relationships. Hindi mp pwede sabihin kilala mo si Trump o ang hari ng saudi arabia by six degrees separation theory kung nakilala lang nila ito sa internet (enclosed system) , that logic easily debunks the theory. At lalo namang palpak sa open system ang theory. Ang anomaly ng theory e it wasn't able to test relationships as real, but kung sasabihin mo it doesn't matter kasi after lang sa flimsy database of who you meet names, lol then any variable can work and not work. Lol
 
That theory is contestable at best. Dapat nagbigay ng formula that we can test sa programming. Walang proof e. Pwedeng magkaruon ng data proving it works ( ciempre kung enclosed system like fb e tayo-tayo magkakasalubungan parang sa phc) and pwede ring may mga data proving ot doesn't work that way (like sa hindi enclosed system, mga hindi internet user hindi mo maestablish connections and relations)
Thinking over it, e fallacious ang theory in practice somehow in fb, kasi dami fake accounts, trolls na wala naman talagan real relationships. Hindi mp pwede sabihin kilala mo si Trump o ang hari ng saudi arabia by six degrees separation theory kung nakilala lang nila ito sa internet (enclosed system) , that logic easily debunks the theory. At lalo namang palpak sa open system ang theory. Ang anomaly ng theory e it wasn't able to test relationships as real, but kung sasabihin mo it doesn't matter kasi after lang sa flimsy database of who you meet names, lol then any variable can work and not work. Lol
It is best if it is through literal social connection, I guess. Haha
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Back
Top