Closed MAY NAGDISENYO BA NITO? Ang Pag-dive ng Gannet

[Gentleman007]

Pag-isipan ito: Bago tumama ang gannet sa tubig, iuunat nito sa likuran ang pakpak niya para maging patusok na gaya ng palaso. May tatakip na protective membrane sa mata nito at papalobohin nito ang mga organ sa leeg at ****** para maging gaya ng airbag na sasalo sa impact.

Pagsisid ng gannet sa dagat, ang tuka, ulo, at leeg nito ay nakahugis-apa. Dahil dito, nababawasan ang lakas ng impact kasi hindi lang isang muscle ang sumasalo sa impact kundi lahat ng muscle sa leeg ng gannet. Sa isang iglap, nag-a-adjust ang mga mata ng gannet para makakita sa ilalim ng tubig.

Gaano kalalim ang kayang sisirin ng gannet? Sa bilis ng pag-dive nito, kaya nitong sumisid nang halos 11 metro, at kaya pa nitong sumisid nang mas malalim kung ikakampay niya ang nakatuping pakpak at ipapadyak ang mga paa niya. Ang totoo, may nakita nang mga gannet na nakapag-dive nang mas malalim pa sa 25 metro sa ilalim ng dagat. Pagkatapos sumisid, magpapalutang na lang ang gannet paakyat sa ibabaw ng tubig, at handa na ulit itong lumipad.

Gumawa ang mga mananaliksik ng mga robot na gannet na magagamit para sa mga search-and-rescue operation. Dinisenyo ang mga ito para lumipad, mag-dive sa tubig, at lumipad ulit. Pero nang subukan ito, isang robot ang paulit-ulit na nasira dahil sa lakas ng impact nito sa tubig. Dahil dito, nasabi ng mga mananaliksik na ang ginawa nilang robot ay “hindi kasinggaling ng gannet sa pag-dive.”

Ano sa palagay mo? Ang kakayahan ba ng gannet sa pag-dive ay resulta ng ebolusyon? O may nagdisenyo nito?

 

[KantonerongBanal]

Ebolusyon para saken kase naniniwala talaga ako na kada off spring ng mga nilalang na aadopt nila yung environment para maka survive

 

[Gentleman007]

Ebolusyon para saken kase naniniwala talaga ako na kada off spring ng mga nilalang na aadopt nila yung environment para maka survive

Two reasons to question evolution
Scientists don’t agree on evolution. Despite decades of research, scientists have yet to come up with an explanation for evolution that they all can agree on.

To think about: If scientists can’t agree on evolution—and they’re supposed to be the experts—are you wrong to question the theory?—Psalm 10:4.

It matters what you believe. “If life came about by accident, then our lives—and all the things in our universe—are meaningless,” says a boy named Zachary. He has a point. After all, if evolution were true, life would not seem to have any lasting purpose. (1 Corinthians 15:32) On the other hand, if creation is true, we can find satisfying answers to questions about the purpose of life and what the future holds.—Jeremiah 29:11.

To think about: How would knowing the truth about evolution and creation make a difference in your life?—Hebrews 11:1.

Questions to consider
CLAIM: ‘Everything in the universe came as a result of a random big bang.’

Who or what caused the big bang?

Which makes more sense—that everything came from nothing or that everything came from something or someone?

CLAIM: ‘Humans evolved from animals.’

If humans evolved from animals—from apes, for example—why is there such a huge gap between the intellectual abilities of humans and those of apes? *

Why are even the most “basic” forms of life so incredibly complex? *

CLAIM: ‘Evolution is a proven fact.’

Has the person making this claim investigated the evidence for himself?

How many people believe in evolution simply because they have been told that all intelligent people believe in it?

 

[Eseru]

missing source/ctto: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Gentleman007]

missing source/ctto: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Pwede ka rin mag request dyan ng online bible study o kaya interactive bible study

 

[ChristianNaitsirhc]

Thank you for proving evolution

First of all we should know where's their habitat

See? They live near coast and island. So what's food does gannet need? There's no rat, fruit, nuts near the coast so what food does gannet need?

Yes. The answer is fish. So they evolve (evolution tru natural selection) to become fish eater. Their beak change to adapt to their diet and environment. Their beak will change if they become nut eater. That's how evolution works. It's all about natural selection and adaptation

 

[ChristianNaitsirhc]

//Two reasons to question evolution
Scientists don’t agree on evolution. Despite decades of research, scientists have yet to come up with an explanation for evolution that they all can agree on.//

-That's a lie. Ask every biologist to find out.

//To think about: If scientists can’t agree on evolution—and they’re supposed to be the experts—are you wrong to question the theory?—Psalm 10:4.//

-Scientist agree on evolution (mostly biologist). So i don't know why you're lying.

//It matters what you believe. “If life came about by accident, then our lives—and all the things in our universe—are meaningless,” //

-That's actually true. That's the reality.

//says a boy named Zachary. He has a point. After all, if evolution were true, life would not seem to have any lasting purpose.//

-The hurtful truth.

// (1 Corinthians 15:32) On the other hand, if creation is true, we can find satisfying answers to questions about the purpose of life and what the future holds.—Jeremiah 29:11.//

-The comfortable lie. And also You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
..................

Questions to consider
//CLAIM: ‘Everything in the universe came as a result of a random big bang.’//

-Random bigbang? We can observe the effect of bigbang so what's your point?

//Who or what caused the big bang?//

-Simple answer: We don't know, either you. If you say "then creation is true" then it's You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

//Which makes more sense—that everything came from nothing or that everything came from something or someone?//

-In astrophysics. Universe didn't came from nothing (creatio ex nihilo) but rather it's came from already pre-existing material (means not created or come from nothing) (creatio ex materia)

//CLAIM: ‘Humans evolved from animals.’//

-We are animals, we already have scientific name called homo sapiens (means wise man). There's also other homo species (but they are all extinct. But we have evidence that they exist)

//If humans evolved from animals—from apes, for example—why is there such a huge gap between the intellectual abilities of humans and those of apes? *//

-Evolution. Octopus are also smart, and dolphins.

//Why are even the most “basic” forms of life so incredibly complex? *//

-So does God (even more complex being)

-and also person who have autism.

//CLAIM: ‘Evolution is a proven fact.’//

-Evolution is a scientific fact*

//Has the person making this claim investigated the evidence for himself?//

-What's your point?

//How many people believe in evolution simply because they have been told that all intelligent people believe in it?//

-there's so many overwhelming evidence to believe in evolution.

[/QUOTE]