What's new

China imposes 4-month fishing ban in South China Sea, including West Philippine Sea

China has imposed a four-month fishing ban in the South China Sea, including parts of the West Philippine Sea where Filipino fishers source their livelihood.

The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) on Monday, May 27, disclosed China's latest fishing moratorium that covers areas of South China Sea 12 degrees of the north latitude. The ban started in May and is expected to end by September 16, according to DFA.

In a statement, the agency said Beijing's move heightens tension between the Philippines and China as it is "unilateral" and "contravenes" the understanding reached by President Marcos and Chinese President Xi Jinping during their bilateral discussion last year.

China's action came at the heels of its continued harassment against Filipino troops and fishers in the West Philippines Sea, which includes conducting dangerous maneuvers, firing multiple times water cannon on resupply and humanitarian missions, among others.

"Through a diplomatic note, the Philippines protested the ban insofar as it includes the Philippines maritime zones over which the Philippines has sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction," DFA said.

As of May 27, 2024, the Philippine government has already filed 25 diplomat protest against China since the start of the year, and a total of 158 under the Marcos administration.

The agency reasserted the Paragraph 716 of the 2016 Arbitral Award on the South China Sea, which already ruled that China's fishing moratorium is against international law.

China, by promulgating its moratorium on fishing in the South China Sea "without exception for areas of the South China Sea falling within the exclusive economic zone of the Philippines and without limiting the moratorium to Chinese flagged vessels, breached Article 56 of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) with respect to the Philippines' sovereign rights over the living resources of its exclusive economic zone," the ruling read.

The Philippines then called on China to cease and desist "from the conduct of îllégâl actions that violates the Philippines' sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction in its maritime zones."

It also urged Beijing to comply with its obligations under international law, particularly the 1982 UNCLOS and the final and binding 2016 Arbitral Award; and, adhere to its commitments under the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea.
 
hinamon kasi sila ng mga fisherman natin, kapag wala silang i-impose sa lugar edi babalik na naman yung rally ng fisherman na yan, previous admin lang ang nakagawa ng matinong agreement kung saan malaya silang makaka pangisda nang di hinuhuli
 
hinamon kasi sila ng mga fisherman natin, kapag wala silang i-impose sa lugar edi babalik na naman yung rally ng fisherman na yan, previous admin lang ang nakagawa ng matinong agreement kung saan malaya silang makaka pangisda nang di hinuhuli
Yet the facts is the previous admin easily give up our chance to extract natural resources inside our EEZ, limit our Freedom of navigation and pull out our Navy and Coastguard to patrol. He also let China destroy the natural resources there and accuse us that we destroy it.
 
Yet the facts is the previous admin easily give up our chance to extract natural resources inside our EEZ,
EEZ does not mean ownership of the resources bossing, it only means na we should be allowed to do economic activities in the area, ang tanong, kaya ba natin mag extract? since wala tayong ginawang extraction edi someone else did it, yun lang yun, no one owns the area bossing
limit our Freedom of navigation and pull out our Navy and Coastguard to patrol.
it is because sending navy means we are not allowing China to do their economic activities in an area that we do not own
He also let China destroy the natural resources there and accuse us that we destroy it.
as i've said, we do not own anything from that area, purely economic rights lang talaga ang EEZ boss, if China destroyed the environment then it is breaking the environmental laws and as an observer we can just file a case internationally
 
haha pabibo kasi masyado current admin ngayon, nagpapauto sila sa US

sabi ko nga MARKADO na lahat ng features dyan sa SCS/WPS, lahat ng islets, atolls, shoals ay may nakasakop na, wala ng maaagaw pa ang PInas, last na yung pag-asa island na nakuha natin mula sa China nuong 1971
 
haha pabibo kasi masyado current admin ngayon, nagpapauto sila sa US

sabi ko nga MARKADO na lahat ng features dyan sa SCS/WPS, lahat ng islets, atolls, shoals ay may nakasakop na, wala ng maaagaw pa ang PInas, last na yung pag-asa island na nakuha natin mula sa China nuong 1971
Do you think they abide and international law on their activities in WPS? Should the other countries fear them for what they did?
 
Do you think they abide and international law on their activities in WPS? Should the other countries fear them for what they did?

what law? the US law? just like their law on Gaza? dont be fooled by their laws paps, uto uto lang magpapabola dyan

sabi ko nga MARKADO na lahat ng features dyan sa SCS/WPS, lahat ng islets, atolls, shoals ay may nakasakop na, wala ng maaagaw pa ang PInas, last na yung pag-asa island na nakuha natin mula sa China nuong 1971

so kung susugod mga banka ng Pinas dun sa mga sakop ng China, expect mo itataboy sila, try din nila ah kasi sa mga isla ng vietnam para maiba naman balita, pero hindi nila gagawin yun dahil ang gagawin lang nila ay yung pang uto uto nila sa mga uto uto
 
what law? the US law?
International law based on UNCLOS, they established a legal framework for EEZs and other maritime activities.

it is because sending navy means we are not allowing China to do their economic activities in an area that we do not own
China are claimants just like us so that means we still have rights to and that area is included in our EEZ.
 
Last edited:
China are claimants just like us so that means we still have rights to and that area is included in our EEZ.
sabi ko nga since wala naman tayong gagawing extraction sa area then someone else already did, there is no point in arguing with China since alam naman natin na wala tayong capacity mag extract diyan, ang kaya lang natin is mangisda in which pinayagan naman, so if kaya nila mag extract bakit pipigilan?
 
International law based on UNCLOS, they established a legal framework for EEZs and other maritime activities.
here is the link for UNCLOS
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

US has not ratified UNCLOS
China has ratified it but rejects some of its provisions, so you cannot enforce it paps, wag papa uto
so what did they violate? have you read the UNCLOS?

China are claimants just like us so that means we still have rights to and that area is included in our EEZ.
what? another propaganda is using the term "claimants", madami talaga nauuto nyan. What is important is who is in control. read again below.

sabi ko nga MARKADO na lahat ng features dyan sa SCS/WPS, lahat ng islets, atolls, shoals ay may nakasakop na(meron ng may CONTROL), wala ng maaagaw pa ang PInas, last na yung pag-asa island na naagaw natin mula sa China nuong 1971 dahil mahina pa sila nuon
 
Last edited:

Users search this thread by keywords

  1. china
Back
Top