If lahat ng bagay may pinagmulan. Then who created the universe?
God po ang nag create ng universe pero tao ang nag create ng God. Ika nga, lahat ng bagay may pinagmulan. Hindi mag-eexist ang God kung hindi sa tao.
Last edited:
If lahat ng bagay may pinagmulan. Then who created the universe?
Let me clarify what you just said. In the beginning God created the universe and when men came to existence, men then created God. Is that what you're saying?God po ang nag create ng universe pero tao ang nag create ng God. Ika nga, lahat ng bagay may pinagmulan. Hindi mag-eexist ang God kung hindi sa tao.
Let me clarify what you just said. In the beginning God created the universe and when men came to existence, men then created God. Is that what you're saying?
ang consciousness ay may pinagmulan (creator) yun ang tao o mga nilalang na may buhayMarami namang immaterial dito sa mundo. Consciousness is the big one. I think is more reasonable to believe so.
wow if only you can give me the endpoint luluhod ako sa iyo, but as far as i know science has not reached any endpoint, iyang sinasabi mong infinite cause para iyan sa mga walang utak, science just said it is not yet known but stu̾pid people fabricated the word infiniteThe problem with continuous process is we will eventually be at the end point, because there is no such thing as infinite cause. There will always be that starting point. Just like what cause the BIG BANG to happen.
you're just shuffling the simple statement, it is clear that there are faiths existed before christian faith was invented, faiths are only invented, it is the reason we give when we don't have a good reasonLet me clarify what you just said. In the beginning God created the universe and when men came to existence, men then created God. Is that what you're saying?
God is self-existence.If everything cannot exist without a creator, who created god then?
How convenient. If everything is bound to have a creator, then god is not excluded to that criterion along with the honda maker.God is self-existence.
He is since He is immaterialHow convenient. If everything is bound to have a creator, then god is not excluded to that criterion along with the honda maker.
He is since He is immaterial
noong mga panahong iyon science is almost silent in all aspects, too many unknowns and every day people are raising questions at natitipon lang wala man lang sagot, kaya for the sake of anwering questions they propose statements and they became the truth and since blanko ang utak ng tao mga walang mga pinag-aralan edi receptive sila masyado until umabot sa god proposals and yeah here comes faith (they hoped that these proposals can come true), faith are just things hoped for, some are too good to be true (the so-called scam of today's language)So for me, I therefore conclude na meron nag create kay God at iyon ay walang iba kungdi tao lang din.
this is definitely what faith is, they are the things in our "what ifs" and religion manages this things as if napatunayan na, things hoped for pa lang, possibilities pa lang but religion has declared them as truth, di maka hintay e because religion needs our monies, they feed us what god did for us and in return they collect what we can do/offer to godnaniniwala din ako sa intelligent design. pero my point din naman mga atheist na yan, "the concept that all matter came from nothing" possible din, for me our comprehension with reality is limited or capped.. what if in the higher plains meron pa mas matindi pa sa "existence" like for example 4th dimension na you exist in all places at once but minus the "existence".. what if existence is just one of the few hierarchies of the whole infinity. beyond the conscious meron pa mas mataas na mga form.
this is definitely what faith is, they are the things in our "what ifs" and religion manages this things as if napatunayan na, things hoped for pa lang, possibilities pa lang but religion has declared them as truth, di maka hintay e because religion needs our monies, they feed us what god did for us and in return they collect what we can do/offer to god
sabi ko rin na ang sinabi mo is possibility lang ("could be"), that is where faith is confined, only for things hoped formalabo yung logic mo, my post is not philosophical. sabi ko nothingness could be a part of higher form of "reality".
sabi ko rin na ang sinabi mo is possibility lang ("could be"), that is where faith is confined, only for things hoped for
ah so need mo pala meron mag second the motion sa point mo hehe anyways, klaro naman point mo, gets ko nga e kaya ginamit ko siya to reinforce my point din hehebut thats not my point though. but its fine.