Magkalaban ang bibliya at science dahil lahat ng nakasulat sa bibliya matagal nang dinisprove ng science. Wala ng natira kahit isang credible information sa bibliya. Mga scientists na nga ang tumututol na ituro ang bibliya sa schools dahil puro mali at outdated na mga nakasulat jan.
Magkalaban ang bibliya at science dahil lahat ng nakasulat sa bibliya matagal nang dinisprove ng science. Wala ng natira kahit isang credible information sa bibliya. Mga scientists na nga ang tumututol na ituro ang bibliya sa schools dahil puro mali at outdated na mga nakasulat jan.
Yan ang pagkakaiba natin boss!!!pinagkokontra niyo samantalang sa amin hind in harmony sila at nadagdagan pa yang kaisipan niyo kasi ini-intertain nyo yong mga maling interpretation sa biblia tulad nitong pinagbasehan niyo
ohh sabi mo kwento lang ang mga maligno tapos ngayon totoo na ang demonyo sayo ano ba talaga lolobasyang kwento ka nanaman ng kwento puro nalang kathang isip ang alam mo be realistic naman lolo basyang
Yan ang pagkakaiba natin boss!!!pinagkokontra niyo samantalang sa amin hind in harmony sila at nadagdagan pa yang kaisipan niyo kasi ini-intertain nyo yong mga maling interpretation sa biblia tulad nitong pinagbasehan niyo
Para sa inyong mga relihiyoso, hindi para sa science. Hindi relihiyoso ang mga scientist at karamihan ay atheist. Rejected ng mga scientists ang creationism at intelligent design. Evolution ang consensus sa science. Atheistic ang evolution.
ohh sabi mo kwento lang ang mga maligno tapos ngayon totoo na ang demonyo sayo ano ba talaga lolobasyang kwento ka nanaman ng kwento puro nalang kathang isip ang alam mo be realistic naman lolo basyang
Para sa inyong mga relihiyoso, hindi para sa science. Hindi relihiyoso ang mga scientist at karamihan ay atheist. Rejected ng mga scientists ang creationism at intelligent design. Evolution ang consensus sa science. Atheistic ang evolution.
Pinagsasabi mong wala. Hindi ka lang marunong magbasa. Yan gabundok ebidensya ng evolution. Kahit anong source nagdidiscuss ng mga ebidensya ng evolution hindi lang Wikipedia.
Pinagsasabi mong wala. Hindi ka lang marunong magbasa. Yan gabundok ebidensya ng evolution. Kahit anong source nagdidiscuss ng mga ebidensya ng evolution hindi lang Wikipedia.
kasasabi molang na hindi pakaka tiwalaan ang site nayan tapos jan moko pababasahin eh di mag kakapareho na tao ng utak ghonghong nyan. patunayan mo na ang ang chimpanzee at ikaw ay mag kamag anak ipasulat mo ang pangalan mo dali mr. lolo basyang wento walang wenta
kasasabi molang na hindi pakaka tiwalaan ang site nayan tapos jan moko pababasahin eh di mag kakapareho na tao ng utak ghonghong nyan. patunayan mo na ang ang chimpanzee at ikaw ay mag kamag anak ipasulat mo ang pangalan mo dali mr. lolo basyang wento walang wenta
ganun ba sige na lolo basyang sayang ang oras ko wala kang kwenta kausap puro kathang isip ang kwento mo walang patunay patunayan mo na mag ka mag anak kayo ni chimpazee mo
sino panganay sa inyo
speaking of nababait kuno ang mga athiest ito panourin niyo ang kalahi nila nagtatanong daw kunwari pero debate pala hanap ayon lumabas yong pagiging mabait niya.
https://phc.onl/#forbidden#/Kn2s25qnHk4
Makaka-relate kayo bakit ganon sila rito.
Forbidden pala search niyo nalang sa YøùTùbé add vs athiest
RSR's List of Scientists
Doubting Darwin
Feb 15, 2019
* Nobody Doubts Darwin They Say : Nobody qualified,
anyway. Certainly no scientists! This week celebrating
Darwin Day the Pew Research Center claimed that
evolution, "is accepted by virtually all scientists" and a while
back PBS promoted their series, "Evolution" claiming
likewise that, "Virtually every scientist in the world believes
the theory to be true." Taking that even further, theoretical
physicist (emphasis on the theoretical) Lawrence
Krauss told RSR that biological science cannot be practiced
without a belief in Darwinian evolution and so "all scientists
are atheists." And hence, Darwinists. However, he forgot
James Tour . And they're all forgetting Fred Williams and
Bob Enyart's ever-growing meta-list of highly-educated
Darwin doubters including many thousands of Ph.D.s,
scientists, and professors! The guys also have reported on
the hundreds of astronomers, astrophysicists and
cosmologists who doubt the Big Bang. (See below rsr.org/
doubters#bb ). So welcome to Real Science Radio's List of
Scholars Doubting Darwin!
* Except for These Guys :
Those who have gone out
of their way to declare
their doubt about Darwin
include the:
- 100 scientists with
master's degrees or
Ph.D.s listed over at AiG
- 200 Ph.D.s listed at
Australia's creation.com
- 300 medical doctors at
Physicians & Surgeons
for Scientific Integrity
- 500 Ph.D. scientists at
the Korean Association of Creation Research
- 600 advanced degreed scientists at the Creation Research
Society
- 1,000 scientists who signified their opposition at
DissentFromDarwin.org
- 3,000 scientists and professors (most of whom hold a
Ph.D. in some field of science) who reject secular
Darwinism to varying degrees as named online by Dr. Jerry
Bergman
* Another Scholar
Doubting Darwin : A
thousand evolutionists
have incorrectly referenced
Newsweek magazine to
claim that 99.86% of
scientists affirm
Darwinism. (See RSR's
original reporting and
debunking of that
misinformation, below .) In
contrast to false reporting,
consider that the famed atheist professor Thomas Nagel
who wrote Mind and Cosmos: why the materialist neo-
Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false .
* Add to the those 5,000 Scientists, Ph.D.s. and Scholars :
Those who think that almost all educated people affirm
Darwin, are forgetting about those listed above, and then
these folks, all identified by careful research conducted by
pro-Darwin institutions:
- 30,000 U.S. public high school biology teachers do not
endorse Darwinism in class
- 100,000 college professors in the U.S. alone who,
according to Harvard researchers, agree that "intelligent
design IS a serious scientific alternative to the Darwinian
theory of evolution."
- 570,000 medical doctors in the U.S. , specialists in applied
science, say God brought about or directly created humans,
as reported by the prestigious Louis Finkelstein Institute.
The field of medicine is an actual applied science (see
definition and applied science section below ) within biology,
practiced by highly educated professionals. Significantly,
60% of U.S. medical doctors reject the secular Darwinist
explanation for our existence with three of five docs
agreeing that either God initiated and guided the process
that led to human life or that God specially created us
human beings.