Closed "The bible is the word of god because the bible says so." is a form of logical fallacy called circular reasoning.

[c8n_666]

"The bible is the word of god because the bible says so." is a form of logical fallacy called circular reasoning.

 

[Katipunero-]

How to answer this thread:
Step 1: Click You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Done.

 

[c8n_666]

How to answer this thread:
Step 1: Click You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Done.

Did you just read my post?

 

[PHC - JOSHIE]

how can you be sure that bible you knew was never altered?

 

[XxRicardoMilosxX]

rip butthurt mga nagsisimba,puro bibliya dito walang quran konti lang ata muslim dito sa phc eh

 

[CutedoC]

how can you be sure that bible you knew was never altered?

because it is inspired by the Holy Spirit. sa gramar is not perfect. and meron ibang mistakes sa age. pero yung mga mistakes na yun wont affect the gospel of Jesus.

Religion is Character building. lahat ng religion teaches you to become a better person in this Earth. but only one religion has a evidence of a Divine Human being coming back to life to save our sins.

 

[Katipunero-]

Did you just read my post?

Binasa mo ba yung verse? Pano naging circular reasoning?

 

[ken_rebirth]

because it is inspired by the Holy Spirit. sa gramar is not perfect. and meron ibang mistakes sa age. pero yung mga mistakes na yun wont affect the gospel of Jesus.

Religion is Character building. lahat ng religion teaches you to become a better person in this Earth. but only one religion has a evidence of a Divine Human being coming back to life to save our sins.

Sir/Mam maari po bang malaman kung ano yung binabanggit nyong 'Evidence'?

 

[Katipunero-]

Sir/Mam maari po bang malaman kung ano yung binabanggit nyong 'Evidence'?

Jesus itself is an evidence.

 

[c8n_666]

Because you just used a verse from the bible to prove the bible. That's a by the book circular reasoning.

 

[c8n_666]

You're being sarcastic, aren't you?

 

[homer_simpson]

because it is inspired by the Holy Spirit. sa gramar is not perfect. and meron ibang mistakes sa age. pero yung mga mistakes na yun wont affect the gospel of Jesus.

Religion is Character building. lahat ng religion teaches you to become a better person in this Earth. but only one religion has a evidence of a Divine Human being coming back to life to save our sins.

Paano yung translations? Don't you think by translating literature, it's inevitable that meanings can change?

Hindi ka ba pwedeng maging mabuting human being without being associated to any religious denominations?

 

[homer_simpson]

Evidence of what exactly?

 

[XxRicardoMilosxX]

hindi daw sabi ng mga teacher ko dati gr10 hahahha private school pa yon

 

[ken_rebirth]

but only one religion has a evidence of a Divine Human being coming back to life to save our sins.

i asked what is the evidence.

Jesus itself is an evidence.

A Classic Circular reasoning.

 

[ken_rebirth]

[XX='c8n_666, c: 28279, m: 256269'][/XX] sorry mam/sir if your interpretation is sarcasm. but i humbly say i am not. thanks

 

[Arlertz]

I asked what is the evidence.

Yung mga inihula na mangyayari, nangyari. Kasama sa history yan. Proven. Siyempre sasabihin nung mga hindi naniniwala sa bible na yung mga hula na yun ay di naman totoo, or isinulat AFTER mangyari yung "hula". Pero nope. Kung pag-aaralan talaga, natupad yung mga inihula hundred years bago ito nagkatotoo. That's one evidence right there.

Hindi sasabihin na 'salita ng Diyos' ang bible ng walang dahilan. At yang mga hula sa bible na ang effect ng katuparan hanggang ngayon ay nagpapakita na ang bible ay guided talaga ng Diyos noong isinulat ito

Nagkakagulo lang dahil sa dami ng nagke-claim na 'Kristiyano sila' pero kung pag-aaralan talaga yan, ang layo ng ginagawa at itinuturo ng mga religion na yon sa kahulugan ng pagiging 'Kristiyano'.

 

[c8n_666]

Yung mga inihula na mangyayari, nangyari. Kasama sa history yan. Proven. Siyempre sasabihin nung mga hindi naniniwala sa bible na yung mga hula na yun ay di naman totoo, or isinulat AFTER mangyari yung "hula". Pero nope. Kung pag-aaralan talaga, natupad yung mga inihula hundred years bago ito nagkatotoo. That's one evidence right there.

Hindi sasabihin na 'salita ng Diyos' ang bible ng walang dahilan. At yang mga hula sa bible na ang effect ng katuparan hanggang ngayon ay nagpapakita na ang bible ay guided talaga ng Diyos noong isinulat ito

Nagkakagulo lang dahil sa dami ng nagke-claim na 'Kristiyano sila' pero kung pag-aaralan talaga yan, ang layo ng ginagawa at itinuturo ng mga religion na yon sa kahulugan ng pagiging 'Kristiyano'.

Are you familiar with the term self-fulfilling prophecy?

 

[Arlertz]

Paano yung translations? Don't you think by translating literature, it's inevitable that meanings can change?

Hindi ka ba pwedeng maging mabuting human being without being associated to any religious denominations?

Yes, it can be change, lalo kung yung mga paniniwala ng translator ay i-incorporate niya sa ita-translate niyang bible. Example, yung mga naniniwala sa HELL or TRINITY. Dahil yan yung paniniwala nila (clearly hindi supported yan ng bible), ang gagawin nila, ita-translate nila yung bible na magmumukang totoo yung HELL at TRINITY kahit hindi naman. Gagamitin nila yung mga salita na aayon sa paniniwala nung mga translator na yon. Pero kung pag-aaralan talaga kung paano ginamit yung salita sa mga verse sa mga available manuscripts, makikita na MALI yung pagkaka-translate nila sa bible.

Gayunman, kung uunawain lang talaga yung itinuturo ng bible, yung PRIMARY teaching nito ay hindi nagbabago kahit pa anong bible ang gamitin.

Again: Yung mga hindi lang naman naniniwala sa bible ang mag agree jan. Sasabihin nila yung mga contradiction sa ibang verse etc, pero kung pag-aaralan mabuti, hindi naman yun contradict

 

[c8n_666]

[XX='ken_rebirth, c: 31243, m: 816168'][/XX] Not you man. I'm pointing out the dude who said "Jesus itself is an evidence."