What's new

RUSSIAN ARMY CAPTURED MORE WESTERN-MADE WEAPONS FROM KIEV FORCES IN DONBASS (PHOTOS)

1653138807091.png

The Russian military continues to captured recently-supplied, Wester-made weapons from Kiev forces in the Donbass region.

On May 20, Russian sources shared photos showing some advanced Western-made weapons which were captured from Kiev forces during a recent battle on a frontline near the city of Izium.

The captured weapons included:

  • Three US-made FGM-148 Javelin anti-tank guided missile along with a Command Launch Unit (CLU). Kiev forces have so far received more than 5,000 Javelin missiles and at least 377 CLUs for the system from the US, the UK, France and Estonia.
  • Five German-made MATADOR anti-tank weapons. Kiev forces have so far received more than 5,100 MATADOR weapons from Germany.
  • Two Swedish-made AT4 recoilless anti-tank weapons. Kiev forces have so far received more than 10,000 AT4 weapons from Sweden and 6,000 others from the US.
  • A British-made NLAW anti-tank missiles. Kiev forces have so far received at least 4,200 NLAW missiles from the UK and 100 others from Luxembourg.
  • A US-made M72 LAW anti-tank weapon. Kiev forces have so far received 4,500 rounds of the weapons from Canada, 4,000 from Norway and 2,700 others from Denmark.
  • A US-made FIM-92 Stinger man-portable air-defense system (MANPADs). Kiev forces have so far received more than 2,250 Stinger MANPADs from the US, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania and the Netherlands.
1653138866161.png


1653138881044.png


In total, the West delivered 60,000 anti-tank weapons to Kyiv forces over the last few months. The delivers of some of these weapons, like the Javelin, NLAW and Stinger, began even before the start of the Russian special military operation in Ukraine.

The Russian military and the armed forces of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and the Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR) have already captured or destroyed loads of Western-made weapons.

The West hopes that it could prolong the war in Ukraine and weaken Russia by continuing to pump weapons into the hands of Kiev forces.
 

Attachments

I'm neither pro-Russia nor anti-Ukraine with this comment, but ang issue kaya nag-invade itong Russia sa Ukraine ay dahil dito sa Western powers na di nirerespeto yung agreement na nagcause ng dissolution ng USSR. From what I heard, parang ina-undermine itong si Russia ng NATO (for obvious reason). Kaya para hindi maging NATO member itong si Ukraine, in-invade siya ni Russia eventually with the purpose of annexation.

Also, war is a profiteering racket. Pag may giyera, expect niyo na may parties na kumikita dyan, and I am not speaking solely on the side of Russia, but also on the opposition as well.
 
Last edited:
ang tingin ko dto ginagamit talaga ng US ung Ukraine para kalabanin yung Russia eh

buahaha, sino ba nauna mag gyera? sino ba lumabag sa agreement, eh 2014 pa nagsimula invasion nang ukraine at hindi naman tinulungan nang NATO.

Nakakagimbal nung napanood kong video , yong kumpol ng mga ukraine soldiers malapitang pinaputukan ng canyon ng t72 tank ng russia, ang istorya daw doon eh akala ng mga ukraine soldiers ay friendlies yong palapit na tanke sa kanilang posisyon yon pala ay russian tank

buahaha, totoo friendly fire yun. yan lang yung bukang bibig nang Russian propaganda. maliban dyan, ilang daan tanke narin nang russia yung sumakabilang buhay na. salat sa automatic reloader nang tank nang russia, mabilis lang pasabugin ito.
 
I'm neither ρrø-Russia nor anti-Ukraine with this comment, but ang issue kaya nag-invade itong Russia sa Ukraine ay dahil dito sa Western powers na di nirerespeto yung agreement na nagcause ng dissolution ng USSR. From what I heard, parang ina-undermine itong si Russia ng NATO (for obvious reason). Kaya para hindi maging NATO member itong si Ukraine, in-invade siya ni Russia eventually with the purpose of annexation.

Also, war is a profiteering racket. Pag may giyera, expect niyo na may parties na kumikita dyan, and I am not speaking solely on the side of Russia, but also on the opposition as well.
ganyan din ang pagkakaintindi ko sa mga sinabi ni putin na nilalabas ng russian state media, yung internation media kuno, nag iiba na yung balita at hindi sinasabi na may dahilan ang russia.
 
buahaha, sino ba nauna mag gyera? sino ba lumabag sa agreement, eh 2014 pa nagsimula invasion nang ukraine at hindi naman tinulungan nang NATO.



buahaha, totoo friendly fire yun. yan lang yung bukang bibig nang Russian propaganda. maliban dyan, ilang daan tanke narin nang russia yung sumakabilang buhay na. salat sa automatic reloader nang tank nang russia, mabilis lang pasabugin ito.
Hindi naman russian yong pinanood kong video american vlogger yon , ayon sa kanya hindi makikitang friendlyfire ang nangyari
 
Yup. That is why it pays to be non-biased in this kind of issue para nakikita yung full picture mismo, hindi yung isang side lang, dala ng dominating na propaganda.
 
friendly fire yun yung nangyari na pinaputukan nang tanke ang mga naka tayo na mga Ukranian troops. tuwang tuwa nga mga fanboy ni Putin sa internet nun eh.
Panoorin mo ulit ang video paps malabong friendlyfire yon kasi may optics ang tanke at may ribbon na blue sa braso ang army ng ukraine para pagkakakilanlan , kaya malabong magka friendlyfire sa point blank ,o malapitang tira
 
Panoorin mo ulit ang video paps malabong friendlyfire yong kasi may optics ang tanke at may ribbon na blue sa braso ang army ng ukraine kaya malabong magka friendlyfire sa point blank

nasa liko-an kasi yung daan kaya di nakita sa malayo nang tanke. mismo sa ukrainian side nag upload nang video, meaning hindi sila bias sa pag rereport.

Yup. That is why it pays to be non-biased in this kind of issue para nakikita yung full picture mismo, hindi yung isang side lang, dala ng dominating na propaganda.

depende yan, sa panahon ngayun kung ano yung mga search mo online yan rin yung sina-suggest sayo. maliban nalang kung totoong nag research ka talaga sa history mag mula ke Staling at sa kasalukuyan.
 
Last edited:
Kanya nga gawing "non-biased" yung search at di dumepende sa feeds ni Google. From what I am seeing, medyo malakas yung "anti-Russia" stance ng internet.
 
yan lang problema sa ibang tao, my tinatagong "underdog" complex. hindi yun reason na maraming mga pro-ukraine sa news at marami tao nakiki-simpatya sa ukraine para sabihin na baka sinira-an lang si Putin or na setup nang West.
 
Panoorin mo ulit ang video paps malabong friendlyfire yon kasi may optics ang tanke at may ribbon na blue sa braso ang army ng ukraine para pagkakakilanlan , kaya malabong magka friendlyfire sa point blank ,o malapitang tira
friendlyfire yung nangyari nag selfie kasi mga Ukrainian sa sirang tanke ng russia napagkamalan tuloy silang russian
 
Back
Top