yeah because science encourages us to always doubt, we must find an errorAgnosticsm is really a deceptive and confused position.
science cannot be performed by one person, community of scientists research on different fields, it doesn't have to be meBe honest. Are you, (or any agnostic) even actively searching for God or find any worth doing so?
in science we start with perception like i think the earth is flat, followed by then let's prove itAnd give me an example of anything (even in science) that is not based on the human perception. Everything is just really something processed by our perception.
Haiiiss.. science is just one way to percieve things.. pero sa pananaw mo yata science is everything.yeah because science encourages us to always doubt, we must find an error
science cannot be performed by one person, community of scientists research on different fields, it doesn't have to be me
in science we start with perception like i think the earth is flat, followed by then let's prove it
saan makikita yung science is perception tool boss?Haiiiss.. science is just one way to percieve things..
science is a tool for discovering everything, science targets ground zero (theory of everything)pero sa pananaw mo yata science is everything.
of course yes because proving something is eliminating any perception, all perception of things (hypothesis) must become description of things through testing the scientist's guess (his own perception)Can you prove anything without perception? Sige nga
saan makikita yung science is perception tool boss?
science is a tool for discovering everything, science targets ground zero (theory of everything)
of course yes because proving something is eliminating any perception, all perception of things (hypothesis) must become description of things through testing the scientist's guess (his own perception)
if i am going to use my perception to describe a rock then i could say a rock is soft, then you would disagree no it's hard then someone else's disagree no it's neither hard nor soft hehe away away lang tayo, but you are right we can actually describe anything with perception (hypothesize) and science is here to unite us to a single description by testing our own descriptionsTalga lang ha. Describe a rock without anything based on your perception.
Ok good you get it.if i am going to use my perception to describe a rock then i could say a rock is soft, then you would disagree no it's hard then someone else's disagree no it's neither hard nor soft hehe away away lang tayo, but you are right we can actually describe anything with perception (hypothesize) and science is here to unite us to a single description by testing our own descriptions
ask a civil engineer and you will get the real worth of a rock hehe for me it's very important when i need something solid/hardOk good you get it.
Next what is the worth of a rock?
Pasensya na nag-iyakan p muna kami nung baby ko hirap padedehen.ask a civil engineer and you will get the real worth of a rock hehe for me it's very important when i need something solid/hard
yung baby ko yesterday muntikan nang ma-confine dahil di na dumede pero pagpasok namin sa ER dumede bigla ay nako kulang na lang sabihan kami it's a prankPasensya na nag-iyakan p muna kami nung baby ko hirap padedehen.
i don't just think that i need something hard (perceived necessity) kundi nasa actual situation na walang something hard (scientifically necessary)You rely on your percieved value based on need.
the civil engineer just don't think he needs rocks hehe they are trained to need it (scientifically worthy)Construction of structures relying on bearing strenght of materials. Kaya may worth yan sa civil engineer.
that what if is another perception to be proven, we use science to prove that perception as wellWhat if construction techniques changes and relies more heavily on tensile strength, because of realization that this is better Practice.
it became worthless (scientifically) after its discovery, kaya nga sabi ko malalaman lang natin ang worth (scientifically) after the discoveryWould a rock still have the same value?
Eto late ko n kasi na add.yung baby ko yesterday muntikan nang ma-confine dahil di na dumede pero pagpasok namin sa ER dumede bigla ay nako kulang na lang sabihan kami it's a prank
i don't just think that i need something hard (perceived necessity) kundi nasa actual situation na walang something hard (scientifically necessary)
the civil engineer just don't think he needs rocks hehe they are trained to need it (scientifically worthy)
that what if is another perception to be proven, we use science to prove that perception as well
it became worthless (scientifically) after its discovery, kaya nga sabi ko malalaman lang natin ang worth (scientifically) after the discovery
Yung baby nmn nmin hindi namin alam p kung bakit lagi nagwawala tuwing dumedede. Kaya parehas kami puyat ni misis. Pumapasok p nmn ako.In this case, do you have to find the hardest substance pertaining to bearing strength before you can say it is not worth looking for?
we can only find the harder and not the hardest, change is constant, it can always come back to bearing strength as the field updates itself surpassing tensile strength once againIn this case, do you have to find the hardest substance pertaining to bearing strength before you can say it is not worth looking for?
Oo nmn, pero the point is you are convinced at one point na hindi mo kailangan bearing strength, without having to hind the best substance.we can only find the harder and not the hardest, change is constant, it can always come back to bearing strength as the field updates itself surpassing tensile strength once again
yes scientifically convinced in this caseOo nmn, pero the point is you are convinced at one point na hindi mo kailangan bearing strength, without having to hind the best substance.
it's because you have perception (hypothesis), a guess in this caseThe same with immortality. You can decide that you dont need immortality without experiencing it.
